Drivers of stability and transience in composition-functioning links during serial propagation of litter-decomposing microbial communities

ABSTRACT Biotic factors that influence the temporal stability of microbial community functioning are an emerging research focus for control of natural and engineered systems. Discovery of common features within community ensembles that differ in functional stability over time is a starting point to explore biotic factors. We serially propagated a suite of soil microbial communities through five generations of 28 d microcosm incubations to examine microbial community compositional and functional stability during plant-litter decomposition. Using DOC abundance as a target function, we hypothesized that microbial diversity, compositional stability, and associated changes in interactions would explain the relative stability of the ecosystem function between generations. Communities with initially high DOC abundance tended to converge towards a “low DOC” phenotype within two generations, but across all microcosms, functional stability between generations was highly variable. By splitting communities into two cohorts based on their relative DOC functional stability, we found that compositional shifts, diversity, and interaction network complexity were associated with the stability of DOC abundance between generations. Further, our results showed that legacy effects were important in determining compositional and functional outcomes, and we identified taxa associated with high DOC abundance. In the context of litter decomposition, achieving functionally stable communities is required to utilize soil microbiomes to increase DOC abundance and long-term terrestrial DOC sequestration as 1 solution to reduce atmospheric carbon dioxide concentrations. Identifying factors that stabilize function for a community of interest may improve the success of microbiome engineering applications. Importance Microbial community functioning can be highly dynamic over time. Identifying and understanding biotic factors that control functional stability is of significant interest for natural and engineered communities alike. Using plant litter decomposing communities as a model system, this study examined the stability of ecosystem function over time following repeated community transfers. By identifying microbial community features that are associated with stable ecosystem functions, microbial communities can be manipulated in ways that promote the consistency and reliability of the desired function, improving outcomes and increasing the utility of microorganisms. Microbial community functioning can be highly dynamic over time. Identifying and understanding biotic factors that control functional stability is of significant interest for natural and engineered communities alike. Using plant litter decomposing communities as a model system, this study examined the stability of ecosystem function over time following repeated community transfers. By identifying microbial community features that are associated with stable ecosystem functions, microbial communities can be manipulated in ways that promote the consistency and reliability of the desired function, improving outcomes and increasing the utility of microorganisms.

[1]  Jonathan Friedman,et al.  Complexity–stability trade-off in empirical microbial ecosystems , 2022, Nature Ecology & Evolution.

[2]  Donovan H. Parks,et al.  Successional dynamics and alternative stable states in a saline activated sludge microbial community over 9 years , 2021, Microbiome.

[3]  Donovan H. Parks,et al.  Successional dynamics and alternative stable states in a saline activated sludge microbial community over 9 years , 2021, Microbiome.

[4]  P. Esker,et al.  Abiotic conditions outweigh microbial origin during bacterial assembly in soils. , 2020, Environmental microbiology.

[5]  Michaeline B. N. Albright,et al.  Soil Bacterial and Fungal Richness Forecast Patterns of Early Pine Litter Decomposition , 2020, Frontiers in Microbiology.

[6]  W. Wieder,et al.  Persistence of soil organic carbon caused by functional complexity , 2020, Nature Geoscience.

[7]  Michaeline B. N. Albright,et al.  Differences in substrate use linked to divergent carbon flow during litter decomposition. , 2020, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[8]  Otto X. Cordero,et al.  Context-dependent dynamics lead to the assembly of functionally distinct microbial communities , 2020, Nature Communications.

[9]  Thomas D. Cuypers,et al.  Trusting the hand that feeds: microbes evolve to anticipate a serial transfer protocol as individuals or collectives , 2019, BMC evolutionary biology.

[10]  B. Singh,et al.  New frontiers in agriculture productivity: Optimised microbial inoculants and in situ microbiome engineering. , 2019, Biotechnology advances.

[11]  M. V. D. van der Heijden,et al.  Fungal-bacterial diversity and microbiome complexity predict ecosystem functioning , 2019, Nature Communications.

[12]  M. Omelka,et al.  Succession of Microbial Decomposers Is Determined by Litter Type, but Site Conditions Drive Decomposition Rates , 2019, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[13]  Ophelia S. Venturelli,et al.  Common principles and best practices for engineering microbiomes , 2019, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[14]  Veronika Dubinkina,et al.  Multistability and regime shifts in microbial communities explained by competition for essential nutrients , 2019, bioRxiv.

[15]  C. Kallenbach,et al.  Managing Agroecosystems for Soil Microbial Carbon Use Efficiency: Ecological Unknowns, Potential Outcomes, and a Path Forward , 2019, Front. Microbiol..

[16]  Brian Munsky,et al.  Machine learning to predict microbial community functions: An analysis of dissolved organic carbon from litter decomposition , 2019, bioRxiv.

[17]  R. Trexler,et al.  The Inherent Conflicts in Developing Soil Microbial Inoculants. , 2019, Trends in biotechnology.

[18]  R. Henrik Nilsson,et al.  The UNITE database for molecular identification of fungi: handling dark taxa and parallel taxonomic classifications , 2018, Nucleic Acids Res..

[19]  S. Blagodatsky,et al.  Nitrogen availability regulates topsoil carbon dynamics after permafrost thaw by altering microbial metabolic efficiency , 2018, Nature Communications.

[20]  J. O’Dwyer,et al.  Stability criteria for complex microbial communities , 2018, bioRxiv.

[21]  J. Jastrow,et al.  The importance of anabolism in microbial control over soil carbon storage , 2017, Nature Microbiology.

[22]  S. Langenheder,et al.  The legacy of the past : effects of historical processes on microbial metacommunities , 2017 .

[23]  Eoin L. Brodie,et al.  Microbial legacies alter decomposition in response to simulated global change , 2016, The ISME Journal.

[24]  P. Baldrian,et al.  Bacterial succession on decomposing leaf litter exhibits a specific occurrence pattern of cellulolytic taxa and potential decomposers of fungal mycelia. , 2016, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[25]  P. Arruda,et al.  Unlocking the bacterial and fungal communities assemblages of sugarcane microbiome , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[26]  Paul J. McMurdie,et al.  DADA2: High resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data , 2016, Nature Methods.

[27]  J. Raes,et al.  Population-level analysis of gut microbiome variation , 2016, Science.

[28]  Hans C. Bernstein,et al.  Gazing into the crystal ball : predicting the behavior of microbial consortia , 2016 .

[29]  Davey L. Jones,et al.  Microbes as Engines of Ecosystem Function: When Does Community Structure Enhance Predictions of Ecosystem Processes? , 2016, Front. Microbiol..

[30]  K. Foster,et al.  The ecology of the microbiome: Networks, competition, and stability , 2015, Science.

[31]  K. Williams,et al.  Disturbed subsurface microbial communities follow equivalent trajectories despite different structural starting points. , 2015, Environmental microbiology.

[32]  G. Luo,et al.  Reactor performances and microbial communities of biogas reactors: effects of inoculum sources , 2015, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[33]  Pelin Yilmaz,et al.  The SILVA and “All-species Living Tree Project (LTP)” taxonomic frameworks , 2013, Nucleic Acids Res..

[34]  M. Cates,et al.  Community history affects the predictability of microbial ecosystem development , 2013, The ISME Journal.

[35]  Susan Holmes,et al.  phyloseq: An R Package for Reproducible Interactive Analysis and Graphics of Microbiome Census Data , 2013, PloS one.

[36]  Pelin Yilmaz,et al.  The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[37]  Jonathan Friedman,et al.  Inferring Correlation Networks from Genomic Survey Data , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[38]  G. Beslon,et al.  New insights into bacterial adaptation through in vivo and in silico experimental evolution , 2012, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[39]  E. K. Pikitch,et al.  Trophic Downgrading of Planet Earth , 2011, Science.

[40]  P. Bork,et al.  Enterotypes of the human gut microbiome , 2011, Nature.

[41]  Marcel Martin.  Cutadapt removes adapter sequences from high-throughput sequencing reads , 2011 .

[42]  Robert C. Edgar,et al.  Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST , 2010, Bioinform..

[43]  P. Gajer,et al.  Vaginal microbiome of reproductive-age women , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  C. Prescott.  Litter decomposition: what controls it and how can we alter it to sequester more carbon in forest soils? , 2010 .

[45]  J. Carstensen,et al.  Return to Neverland: Shifting Baselines Affect Eutrophication Restoration Targets , 2009 .

[46]  Dominique Schneider,et al.  Death and cannibalism in a seasonal environment facilitate bacterial coexistence. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[47]  K. Kalbitz,et al.  Contribution of dissolved organic matter to carbon storage in forest mineral soils , 2008 .

[48]  J. Martiny,et al.  Testing the functional significance of microbial composition in natural communities. , 2007, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[49]  E. Bååth,et al.  Comparison of factors limiting bacterial growth in different soils , 2007 .

[50]  L. Tranvik,et al.  Structure and Function of Bacterial Communities Emerging from Different Sources under Identical Conditions , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[51]  D. Haydon,et al.  Alternative stable states in ecology , 2003 .

[52]  R. Lenski,et al.  Parallel changes in gene expression after 20,000 generations of evolution in Escherichia coli , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  David Botstein,et al.  Characteristic genome rearrangements in experimental evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[54]  Stephen R Carpenter,et al.  Multiple states in river and lake ecosystems. , 2002, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[55]  G. Quinn,et al.  Experimental Design and Data Analysis for Biologists , 2002 .

[56]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems , 2001, Nature.

[57]  Daniel E Rozen,et al.  Long‐Term Experimental Evolution in Escherichia coli. VIII. Dynamics of a Balanced Polymorphism , 2000, The American Naturalist.

[58]  ROBERT M. MAY,et al.  Will a Large Complex System be Stable? , 1972, Nature.

[59]  R. Lewontin,et al.  The meaning of stability. , 2020, Brookhaven symposia in biology.

[60]  R. Paine.  Food Web Complexity and Species Diversity , 1966, The American Naturalist.