Cross-border knowledge transfer and innovation in the European neighbourhood: Tourism cooperation at the Finnish-Russian border

Abstract Knowledge transfer and innovation cooperation between the EU and its neighbours has remained weakly developed. To promote this cooperation, the EU has set up initiatives for the European neighbourhood. The issue has, however, received very limited scholarly attention in the field of tourism. This research gap is addressed here via interview data collected from participants in tourism related EU-funded projects in the Finnish-Russian cross-border region. These underline the importance of EU-funding in facilitating knowledge transfer and innovation between Finland and Russia. While language issues, and differences in business culture and administrative/legislative systems between the two countries, constitute barriers for practical cross-border cooperation, it is cross-border differences in culture and technological capabilities that drive cross-border knowledge transfer and innovation in the cross-border region. The paper concludes with policy recommendations for promoting future cross-border cooperation in innovation and tourism.

[1]  Michaela Trippl,et al.  Distance, Proximity and Types of Cross-border Innovation Systems: A Conceptual Analysis , 2013 .

[2]  Michaela Trippl.  Developing Cross‐Border Regional Innovation Systems: Key Factors And Challenges , 2010 .

[3]  C. Autant‐Bernard,et al.  European Knowledge Neighbourhood: Knowledge Production in EU Neighbouring Countries and Intensity of the Relationship with EU Countries , 2017 .

[4]  S. Stepanova.  Cross-border tourism in the Russian Northwest: general trends and features of development , 2014 .

[5]  L. O’dowd.  Transnational integration and cross-border regions in the European Union , 2002 .

[6]  Timo Mitze,et al.  Scientific collaboration between ‘old’ and ‘new’ member states: Did joining the European Union make a difference? , 2015, Scientometrics.

[7]  H. Schrader.  Social capital and social transformation in Russia , 2004 .

[8]  Arie Stoffelen,et al.  Tourism and cross-border regional development: insights in European contexts , 2017 .

[9]  F. Zach,et al.  Network, knowledge and relationship impacts on innovation in tourism destinations , 2017 .

[10]  D. Ioannides,et al.  Transboundary Collaboration in Tourism: the Case of the Bothnian Arc , 2006 .

[11]  Allan M. Williams,et al.  Knowledge transfer and innovation among attractions. , 2010 .

[12]  Kathleen M. MacQueen,et al.  Applied Thematic Analysis , 2011 .

[13]  F. Tödtling,et al.  One size fits all?: Towards a differentiated regional innovation policy approach , 2005 .

[14]  C. Sirangelo,et al.  Union , 2018, Oxford Scholarship Online.

[15]  Gareth Shaw,et al.  Knowledge transfer and management in tourism organisations: An emerging research agenda , 2009 .

[16]  R. Lorenz.  What is innovation?: Insights and perspectives on the term 'innovation' , 2010 .

[17]  Nathalie. Tocci,et al.  From Boundary to Borderland: Transforming the Meaning of Borders through the European Neighbourhood Policy , 2007, European Foreign Affairs Review.

[18]  Adi Weidenfeld.  Tourism Diversification and Its Implications for Smart Specialisation , 2018 .

[19]  G. Petrakos,et al.  Economic geography and European integration: the effects on the EU's external border regions , 2008 .

[20]  Anne-Mette Hjalager.  100 Innovations That Transformed Tourism , 2015 .

[21]  Eeva-Kaisa Prokkola.  Resources and barriers in tourism development: cross-border cooperation, regionalization and destination building at the Finnish-Swedish border , 2008 .

[22]  B. Mulloth,et al.  Developing cross-border regional innovation systems with clean technology entrepreneurship: the case of Øresund , 2013 .

[23]  T. Makkonen,et al.  Cross-border regional innovation systems: conceptual backgrounds, empirical evidence and policy implications , 2016 .

[24]  Y. Saveliev.  Regional economic policy and structural changes in the economies of Russian regions , 2013 .

[25]  Jeremy Kendall,et al.  Interpersonal trust and voluntary associations: examining three approaches. , 2002, The British journal of sociology.

[26]  T. Studzieniecki,et al.  The System of Cross-border Tourism in the Polish-Russian Borderland , 2016 .

[27]  Allan M. Williams,et al.  Cognitive and cultural proximity between service managers and customers in cross-border regions: knowledge transfer implications , 2016 .

[28]  Chiara Brambilla.  Exploring the Critical Potential of the Borderscapes Concept , 2015 .

[29]  J. Koistinen,et al.  ‘Rules of the game’ in cross-border cooperation: legal-administrative differences in Finnish–Russian crime prevention , 2018 .

[30]  Edward Brooker,et al.  Developing a Tourism Innovation Typology , 2014 .

[31]  E. Wood,et al.  Innovation in tourism: Re-conceptualising and measuring the absorptive capacity of the hotel sector , 2014 .

[32]  Eeva-Kaisa Prokkola.  Borders in tourism: the transformation of the Swedish–Finnish border landscape , 2010 .

[33]  Arie Stoffelen,et al.  Obstacles to achieving cross-border tourism governance: A multi-scalar approach focusing on the German-Czech borderlands , 2017 .

[34]  E. Wood,et al.  The absorptive capacity of tourism organisations , 2015 .

[35]  Jarno Suni.  International Conference on Rural Tourism and Regional Development Proceedings-Rural Tourism as a Facilitator of Regional Development , 2014 .

[36]  M. Mayer.  INNOVATION AS A SUCCESS FACTOR IN TOURISM: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM WESTERN AUSTRIAN CABLE-CAR COMPANIES , 2009 .

[37]  Allan M. Williams,et al.  INTERNATIONALIZATION AND INNOVATION IN TOURISM , 2011 .

[38]  H. Eskelinen,et al.  A vision of a Twin City: Exploring the only case of adjacent urban settlements at the Finnish‐Russian Border , 2005 .

[39]  Thomas Scherngell,et al.  Towards an integrated European Research Area? Findings from Eigenvector spatially filtered spatial interaction models using European Framework Programme data , 2012 .

[40]  Adi Weidenfeld.  Tourism and cross border regional innovation systems , 2013 .

[41]  Joachim Blatter.  Explaining crossborder cooperation: A border‐focused and border‐external approach , 1997 .

[42]  J. Law,et al.  Boundary Variations: An Introduction , 2005 .

[43]  Robert Knippschild,et al.  The conformance and performance principles in territorial cooperation: a critical reflection on the evaluation of INTERREG projects , 2017 .

[44]  G. Petrakos,et al.  A border regions typology in the enlarged European Union , 2005 .

[45]  Eeva-Kaisa Prokkola.  Regionalization, Tourism Development and Partnership: The European Union's North Calotte Sub-programme of INTERREG III A North , 2011 .

[46]  Jane Bliss-Holtz,et al.  Rules of the game , 1991, On the issues.

[47]  Eeva-Kaisa Prokkola.  Cross‐border Regionalization and Tourism Development at the Swedish‐Finnish Border: “Destination Arctic Circle” , 2007 .

[48]  Jaime E. Souto.  Business model innovation and business concept innovation as the context of incremental innovation and radical innovation. , 2015 .

[49]  V. Hubačíková,et al.  Contemporary development of peripheral parts of the Czech-Polish borderland: Case study of the Javorník area , 2013 .

[50]  C. Edquist,et al.  Broad-Based Innovation Policy , 2009 .

[51]  F. Durand,et al.  Eurometropolis Lille–Kortrijk–Tournai: Cross-border integration with or without the border? , 2018 .

[52]  The EU-Russia Innovation Cooperation: Some Experiences Emerging from Finnish-Russian Innovation Collaboration , 2011 .

[53]  J. Nilsson,et al.  Creating Cross‐Border Destinations: Interreg Programmes and Regionalisation in the Baltic Sea Area , 2010 .

[54]  T. Hokkanen,et al.  ICT Innovation and Local Economy: Mobile Game as a Tourist Attraction , 2013 .

[55]  L. O’dowd.  The Changing Significance of European Borders , 2002 .

[56]  Jaume Guia,et al.  Emergence of governance in cross-border destinations , 2014 .

[57]  G. Yarovoy,et al.  Whose partnership? Regional participatory arrangements in CBC programming on the Finnish–Russian border* , 2015 .

[58]  Rosanna Garcia,et al.  A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review , 2002 .

[59]  Eva Rajčáková,et al.  Cross-Border Cooperation in Slovak-Czech Border Region under EU Programmes , 2013 .

[60]  E. Gualini.  Cross-border Governance: Inventing Regions in a Trans-national Multi-level Polity , 2003 .

[61]  H. Eskelinen,et al.  Influences from and Influences on Europe: the Evolution of Spatial Planning and Territorial Governance in Finland , 2011 .

[62]  Koen Frenken,et al.  Related variety and economic development: a literature review , 2016 .

[63]  M. Paldam.  Social Capital: One or Many? Definition and Measurement , 2000 .