Procid: Bridging Consensus Building Theory with the Practice of Distributed Design Discussions

Consensus is a desired but elusive goal in many distributed discussions. A critical problem is that discussion platforms lack mechanisms for realizing consensus strategies and realizing these strategies without tool support can be hard. This paper introduces Procid, a novel browser plugin that provides interaction and visualization features for bringing consensus strategies to distributed design discussions. Key features include the ability to organize discussions around ideas, to register and visualize support for or against ideas, and to define criteria for evaluating ideas. It also applies interaction constraints fostering best practices of consensus building. Procid extends the discussion platform of one open source software community. Two evaluations were conducted. The first collected perceptions of the tool from members of the community for their own discussions. The second compared how Procid affects a distributed design discussion relative to the current discussion platform in the community. Results of both studies showed that users found the features of our tool beneficial and perceived it as more effective for consensus building than the existing platform.

[1]  C. Anderson,et al.  The positive and negative effects of anger on dispute resolution: evidence from electronically mediated disputes. , 2004, The Journal of applied psychology.

[2]  Brian P. Bailey,et al.  IdeaTracker: An Interactive Visualization Supporting Collaboration and Consensus Building in Online Interface Design Discussions , 2011, INTERACT.

[3]  Alan Borning,et al.  Supporting reflective public thought with considerit , 2012, CSCW.

[4]  Gerardine DeSanctis,et al.  A foundation for the study of group decision support systems , 1987 .

[5]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Do visualizations improve synchronous remote collaboration? , 2008, CHI.

[6]  Maiko Yasuda,et al.  Color and facial expressions , 2010 .

[7]  Paul Johns,et al.  Pathfinder: an online collaboration environment for citizen scientists , 2009, CHI.

[8]  Jonathan Grudin,et al.  Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers , 1994, CACM.

[9]  Parmit K. Chilana,et al.  Design, discussion, and dissent in open bug reports , 2011, iConference '11.

[10]  Robert O. Briggs,et al.  AIS Electronic Library (AISeL) , 2018 .

[11]  Desney S. Tan,et al.  Impromptu: a new interaction framework for supporting collaboration in multiple display environments and its field evaluation for co-located software development , 2008, CHI.

[12]  Omar F. El-Gayar,et al.  A web-based multi-perspective decision support system for information security planning , 2010, Decis. Support Syst..

[13]  Ivan Beschastnikh,et al.  Community, consensus, coercion, control: cs*w or how policy mediates mass participation , 2007, GROUP.

[14]  Tovi Grossman,et al.  An exploratory study of input configuration and group process in a negotiation task using a large display , 2007, CHI.

[15]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  CommentSpace: structured support for collaborative visual analysis , 2011, CHI.

[16]  Michel Avery Building United Judgment: A Handbook for Consensus Decision Making , 1981 .

[17]  F El-GayarOmar,et al.  A web-based multi-perspective decision support system for information security planning , 2010, DSS 2010.

[18]  Kate Ehrlich,et al.  Community insights: helping community leaders enhance the value of enterprise online communities , 2013, CHI.

[19]  Kenneth Y. Goldberg,et al.  Opinion space: a scalable tool for browsing online comments , 2010, CHI.

[20]  Nicholas J. Pioch,et al.  POLESTAR: collaborative knowledge management and sensemaking tools for intelligence analysts , 2006, CIKM '06.

[21]  Andrea Esuli,et al.  SentiWordNet 3.0: An Enhanced Lexical Resource for Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining , 2010, LREC.

[22]  Alice M. Agogino,et al.  Showing is sharing: building shared understanding in human-centered design teams with Dazzle , 2012, DIS '12.

[23]  David P. Tegarden,et al.  Business Information Visualization , 1999, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Alan Borning,et al.  Is this what you meant?: promoting listening on the web with reflect , 2012, CHI.

[25]  Wai-Tat Fu,et al.  Consensus building in open source user interface design discussions , 2012, CHI.

[26]  Enrique Herrera-Viedma,et al.  Using Visualization Tools to Guide Consensus in Group Decision Making , 2007, WILF.

[27]  Preston G. Smith The art of innovation: lessons in creativity from IDEO, America’s leading design firm: Tom Kelley with Jonathan Littman; New York: Doubleday, 2001, 308 + xii pages, $26.00 , 2002 .

[28]  William W. Hambleton,et al.  Consensus Building , 1978 .

[29]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  Socialization tactics in wikipedia and their effects , 2010, CSCW '10.

[30]  Damon Horowitz,et al.  The anatomy of a large-scale social search engine , 2010, WWW '10.

[31]  Maarten Sierhuis,et al.  Hypermedia Support for Argumentation-Based Rationale , 2006 .

[32]  Jay F. Nunamaker,et al.  A group decision support system for idea generation and issue analysis in organization planning , 1986, CSCW '86.