Budgets? We Don’t Need No Stinkin’ Budgets: Ten Things We Think We Think We Know about Budgeting and Performance

Learning is the only sure way to achieve ongoing performance improvement. Budgeting and learning are fundamentally orthogonal processes. Budgeting stabilizes, which is a good thing in itself, and promotes economy, but it discourages understanding of variation. Learning requires perturbation and measurement. Given the processes through which service accomplishment and operational excellence are realized, it is unlikely that budgeting, as generally practiced in government, can promote continuous improvement in enterprise performance.

[1]  F. Thompson Matching Responsibilities with Tactics: Administrative Controls and Modern Government , 1993 .

[2]  Kari Lukka,et al.  Budgetary biasing in organizations: Theoretical framework and empirical evidence , 1988 .

[3]  Joachim Wehner The Case for Congressional Budgeting , 2011 .

[4]  Manmohan S. Kumar,et al.  The Discipline-Enhancing Role of Fiscal Institutions: Theory and Empirical Evidence , 2007, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[5]  F. Thompson,et al.  Budgets? We Don’t Need No Stinkin Budgets: Ten Things We Think We Think We Know about Budgets and Performance , 2010 .

[6]  J. Frankel A Lesson from the South for Fiscal Policy in the US and Other Advanced Countries , 2011 .

[7]  F. Thompson Mission‐Driven, Results‐Oriented Budgeting: Fiscal Administration and the New Public Management , 1994 .

[8]  A. Wildavsky Budgeting : A Comparative Theory of Budgetary Processes , 1975 .

[9]  Jeremy Hope,et al.  Beyond Budgeting: How Managers Can Break Free from the Annual Performance Trap , 2003 .

[10]  Michael U. Dothan,et al.  A Better Budget Rule , 2009 .

[11]  J. Hacker The Great Risk Shift: The New Economic Insecurity and the Decline of the American Dream , 2006 .

[12]  Henrich R. Greve,et al.  Organizational Learning from Performance Feedback: A Behavioral Perspective on Innovation and Change , 2003 .

[13]  Gerald A. Feltham,et al.  Cost Determination: A Conceptual Approach , 1976 .

[14]  Andrew B. Whitford Adapting Agencies: Competition, Imitation, and Punishment in the Design of Bureaucratic Performance , 2005 .

[15]  L. Langbein Economics, Public Service Motivation, and Pay for Performance: Complements or Substitutes? , 2010 .

[16]  G. Hofstede The game of budget control , 1972 .

[17]  K. Merchant Influences on departmental budgeting: an empirical examination of a contingency model , 1984 .

[18]  R. Meyers,et al.  The Executive Budget in the Federal Government: The First Century and Beyond , 2011 .

[19]  H. Johnson,et al.  Profit Beyond Measure: Extraordinary Results Through Attention to Work and People , 2000 .

[20]  Johnathan Roberts,et al.  The Modern Firm: Organizational Design for Performance and Growth , 2004 .

[21]  R. Meyers Path Dependence and the Federal Budget Process: Explanation and Prescription , 2011 .

[22]  F. Thompson The Political Economy of Public Administration , 2008 .

[23]  Andy Neely,et al.  Management Learning Not Management Control: The True Role of Performance Measurement? , 2006 .

[24]  Donald P. Moynihan,et al.  The Dynamics of Performance Management: Constructing Information and Reform , 2008 .

[25]  S. Kerr On the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B. , 1975 .

[26]  Michael Barzelay,et al.  Learning from Second-Hand Experience: Methodology for Extrapolation-Oriented Case Research , 2007 .

[27]  Vincent K. Chong,et al.  Budget Goal Commitment and Informational Effects of Budget Participation on Performance: A Structural Equation Modeling Approach , 2002 .

[28]  D. Moynihan,et al.  Organizational Performance Managing for Results in State Government : Evaluating a Decade of Reform , 2005 .

[29]  R. Behn The Psychological Barriers to Performance Management , 2002 .

[30]  M. Barzelay,et al.  Responsibility Budgeting at the Air Force Materiel Command , 2006 .

[31]  R. Shiller The New Financial Order: Risk in the 21st Century , 2003 .

[32]  Simon Calmar Andersen,et al.  Policy Stability and Organizational Performance: Is There a Relationship? , 2010 .

[33]  Natasa Rupcic,et al.  The fifth discipline-the art and practice of the learning organisation , 2002 .

[34]  G. Eskeland,et al.  Fiscal decentralization and the challenge of hard budget constraints , 2000 .

[35]  J. Dewey,et al.  The Public and its Problems , 1927 .

[36]  Hossein Nouri,et al.  The relationship between budget participation and job performance: The roles of budget adequacy and organizational commitment , 1998 .

[37]  E. Brynjolfsson,et al.  Beyond Computation: Information Technology, Organizational Transformation and Business Performance , 2000 .

[38]  G. Myles,et al.  THE MIRRLEES REVIEW: A PROPOSAL FOR SYSTEMATIC TAX REFORM , 2012, National Tax Journal.

[39]  Nan Chai,et al.  Sustainability Performance Evaluation System in Government: A Balanced Scorecard Approach Towards Sustainable Development , 2009 .

[40]  E. Patashnik The contractual nature of budgeting: A transaction cost perspective on the design of budgeting institutions , 1996, Policy Sciences.

[41]  Geoffrey B. Sprinkle,et al.  Budget‐Based Contracts, Budget Levels, and Group Performance , 2003 .

[42]  Michael D. Shields,et al.  Budgeting Research: Three Theoretical Perspectives and Criteria for Selective Integration , 2003 .

[43]  Robert A. Simons,et al.  Levers of Control: How Managers Use Innovative Control Systems to Drive Strategic Renewal , 1994 .

[44]  W. Buiter Principles of Budgetary and Financial Policy , 1990 .

[45]  Antonio Davila,et al.  How High Is Your Return on Management , 1998 .

[46]  D. Kiefer The Dynamic Behavior of Public Budgets: An Empirical Study of Australian Local Governments , 1981 .

[47]  F. Thompson,et al.  Organizational Process Models of Budgeting , 2002 .