This article explores some critical methodological and theoretical issues that emerge from recent research into word association behaviour in second language (L2) learners. The studies that we discuss here all use computer simulations as a tool to investigate L2 lexical networks, and to compare these networks with those of first language (L1) speakers. This article broaches some previously unacknowledged complexities in this kind of research, and draws attention to the importance of which assumptions are built into simulation models. The article queries some of the assumptions of our 2002 article (Wilks and Meara, 2002), and provides a reinterpretation of some of the data that we presented there. The article argues that simulation modelling forces us to make critical analyses of assumptions in a way that is not always necessary in less exacting experimental environments.
[1]
D. Palermo.
Norms of Word Association.
,
1971
.
[2]
P. Meara.
Vocabulary in a second language
,
1983
.
[3]
J. Hulstijn.
Retention of Inferred and Given Word Meanings: Experiments in Incidental Vocabulary Learning
,
1992
.
[4]
James Coady,et al.
INCIDENTAL VOCABULARY ACQUISITION IN A SECOND LANGUAGE
,
1999,
Studies in Second Language Acquisition.
[5]
Paul Meara,et al.
Untangling word webs: graph theory and the notion of density in second language word association networks
,
2002
.
[6]
William E. Nagy,et al.
Vol23#1_Incidental vs. Instructional Approaches to Increasing Reading Vocabulary
,
1985
.
[7]
J. Aitchison.
Words in the mind
,
1994
.