Intellectual Property Rights and Plant Genetic Resources: Options for a Sui Generis System

This study aims at the development and evaluation of elements for inclusion in an intellectual property rights system sui generis for the protection of plant varieties. Pursuant to the TRIPS Agreement, members shall provide patent protection for any inventions, whether products or processes, in all fields of technology. Members are allowed to exclude from patentability inter alia plants and animals other than microorganisms. However, the TRIPS Agreement explicitly requires members to provide for the protection of plant varieties either "by patents or by an effective sui generis system or by any combination thereof." The report studies the legal obligations posed by the TRIPS agreement in relation to plant genetic resources. It further analyzes the status of plant genetic resources under the existing international regulatory framework, in particular the Convention on Biological Diversity. The study gives an overview of and discusses possible elements, for example recognition of Farmers' Rights, which, if included in a protection system for plant varieties, may contribute to reconciliation of the interests of formal breeders with the rights and interests of informal breeders. The study also examines the options for regulating the interface between a

[1]  S. Jaffee,et al.  THE ROLES OF THE PRIVATE AND PUBLIC SECTORS IN ENHANCING THE PERFORMANCE OF SEED SYSTEMS , 1994 .

[2]  J. Reichman.  The TRIPs Component of the GATT’s Uruguay Round: Competitive Prospects for Intellectual Property Owners in an Integrated World Market , 1993 .

[3]  David M. Ackerman,et al.  Biotechnology, Indigenous Peoples, and Intellectual Property Rights , 1993 .

[4]  S. A. Bent.  Intellectual Property Rights in Biotechnology Worldwide , 1987 .

[5]  N. Carey,et al.  New developments in biotechnology: Patenting life , 1990 .

[6]  The US extension of plant variety protection: a critical evaluation , 1995 .

[7]  M. Bronckers.  The Impact of TRIPS: Intellectual Property Protection in Developing Countries , 1994, Common Market Law Review.

[8]  J. Kloppenburg,et al.  First the Seed: The Political Economy of Plant Biotechnology, 1492-2000 , 1989 .

[9]  E. Frison,et al.  A multilateral system for plant genetic resources: imperatives, achievements and challenges , 1994 .

[10]  F. Capotorti.  Study on the rights of persons belonging to ethnic, religious, and linguistic minorities , 1979 .

[11]  Lyle Glowka,et al.  A guide to the Convention on Biological Diversity , 1994 .

[12]  J. Wijk,et al.  The impact of plant breeders' rights in developing countries: Debate and experience in Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Mexico and Uruguay , 1995 .

[13]  S. Verma.  The Biodiversity Convention and Intellectual Property Rights: A Study in Sustainable Development , 1995 .

[14]  P. Kapoor-Vijay,et al.  Global Biodiversity Strategy. , 1992 .

[15]  M. Swaminathan.  Farmer's rights and plant genetic resources, recognition and reward : a dialogue , 1995 .

[16]  C. Correa.  Sovereign and property rights over plant genetic resources , 1995 .

[17]  J. Barton,et al.  Material transfer agreements in genetic resources exchange - the case of the International Agricultural Research Centres , 1994 .

[18]  D. Janzen,et al.  An intellectual property rights framework for biodiversity prospecting. , 1993 .

[19]  T. Swanson,et al.  The Appropriation of the Benefits of Plant Genetic Resources for Agriculture: an economic analysis o , 1994 .

[20]  Graham Dutfield,et al.  Beyond intellectual property : toward traditional resource rights for indigenous peoples and local communities , 1996 .