Geodetic observations of interseismic strain segmentation at the Sumatra Subduction Zone

Deformation above the Sumatra subduction zone, revealed by Global Positioning System (GPS) geodetic surveys, shows nearly complete coupling of the forearc to the subducting plate south of 0.5°S and half as much to the north. The abrupt change in plate coupling coincides with the boundary between the rupture zones of the 1833 and 1861 (Mw>8) thrust earthquakes. The rupture boundary appears as an abrupt change in strain accumulation well into the interseismic cycle, suggesting that seismic segmentation is controlled by properties of the plate interface that persist through more than one earthquake cycle. Structural evidence indicates that differences in basal shear stress may be related to elevated pore pressure in the north.

[1]  Y. Okada.  Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space , 1985 .

[2]  D. G. Moore,et al.  Structure, Tectonics, and Geological History of the Northeastern Indian Ocean , 1982 .

[3]  C. Scholz,et al.  On the mechanism of seismic decoupling and back arc spreading at subduction zones , 1995 .

[4]  J. M. Dow,et al.  High precision orbits for the international GPS service for geodynamics (IGS) , 1995 .

[5]  J. Wakefield.  Fight to restore DoD support of academic research begins , 1994 .

[6]  Kelin Wang,et al.  Thermal constraints on the zone of major thrust earthquake failure: The Cascadia Subduction Zone , 1993 .

[7]  H. K. Acharya,et al.  Regional variations in the rupture-length magnitude relationships and their dynamical significance , 1979 .

[8]  Ian Parsons,et al.  Surface deformation due to shear and tensile faults in a half-space , 1986 .

[9]  J. Suppe,et al.  Mechanics of fold-and-thrust belts and accretionary wedges , 1983 .

[10]  Raul Madariaga,et al.  Dynamic faulting under rate-dependent friction , 1994 .

[11]  L. Ruff.  Do trench sediments affect great earthquake occurrence in subduction zones? , 1989 .

[12]  R. Mccaffrey.  Slip vectors and stretching of the Sumatran fore arc , 1991 .

[13]  R. Mccaffrey.  On the role of the upper plate in great subduction zone earthquakes , 1993 .

[14]  J. C. Savage,et al.  Absence of strain accumulation in the Shumagin Seismic Gap, Alaska, 1980–1987 , 1988 .

[15]  John B. Rundle,et al.  Derivation of the complete Gutenberg‐Richter magnitude‐frequency relation using the principle of scale invariance , 1989 .

[16]  W. Mccann,et al.  Seismic history and seismotectonics of the Sunda Arc , 1987 .

[17]  D. Sandwell,et al.  Evolution of the eastern Indian Ocean since the Late Cretaceous: Constraints from Geosat altimetry , 1989 .

[18]  J. Curray,et al.  Structural frame work of the fore-arc basin, NW Sumatra , 1980, Journal of the Geological Society.

[19]  Sunaryo,et al.  Lateral variation in slab orientation beneath Toba Caldera, northern Sumatra , 1996 .

[20]  R. Mccaffrey.  Global variability in subduction thrust zone-forearc systems , 1994 .

[21]  Kurt L. Feigl,et al.  Space geodetic measurement of crustal deformation in central and southern California , 1993 .

[22]  J. Kelleher,et al.  Buoyant zones, great earthquakes, and unstable boundaries of subduction , 1976 .

[23]  C. Scholz.  The Mechanics of Earthquakes and Faulting , 1990 .

[24]  M. Cloos.  Thrust-type subduction-zone earthquakes and seamount asperities: A physical model for seismic rupture , 1992 .

[25]  Richard G. Gordon,et al.  Effect of recent revisions to the geomagnetic reversal time scale on estimates of current plate motions , 1994 .

[26]  J. C. Savage.  A dislocation model of strain accumulation and release at a subduction zone , 1983 .

[27]  J. Curray,et al.  Structure of the Sunda Trench lower slope off sumatra from multichannel seismic reflection data , 1980 .