The Inter-rater Variability of Clinical Assessment in Post-anoxic Myoclonus

Background Acute post-anoxic myoclonus (PAM) can be divided into an unfavorable (generalized/subcortical) and more favorable ((multi)focal/cortical) outcome group that could support prognostication in post-anoxic encephalopathy; however, the inter-rater variability of clinically assessing these PAM subtypes is unknown. Methods We prospectively examined PAM patients using a standardized video protocol. Videos were rated by three neurologists who classified PAM phenotype (generalized/(multi)focal), stimulus sensitivity, localization (proximal/distal/both), and severity (Clinical Global Impression-Severity Scale (CGI-S) and Unified Myoclonus Rating Scale (UMRS)). Results Poor inter-rater agreement was found for phenotype and stimulus sensitivity (κ=−0.05), moderate agreement for localization (κ=0.46). Substantial agreement was obtained for the CGI-S (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)=0.64) and almost perfect agreement for the UMRS (ICC=0.82). Discussion Clinical assessment of PAM is not reproducible between physicians, and should therefore not be used for prognostication. PAM severity measured by the UMRS appears to be reliable; however, the relation between PAM severity and outcome is unknown.

[1]  J. Caviness,et al.  Post-hypoxic Myoclonus: Current Concepts, Neurophysiology, and Treatment , 2016, Tremor and other hyperkinetic movements.

[2]  A. Rossetti,et al.  Neurological prognostication of outcome in patients in coma after cardiac arrest , 2016, The Lancet Neurology.

[3]  M. Beudel,et al.  Electroencephalographic Findings in Posthypoxic Myoclonus , 2016, Journal of intensive care medicine.

[4]  Barbara T. Unger,et al.  Neurologic Outcomes and Postresuscitation Care of Patients With Myoclonus Following Cardiac Arrest* , 2015, Critical care medicine.

[5]  J. Soar,et al.  Prognostication in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest: An advisory statement from the European Resuscitation Council and the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine , 2014, Intensive Care Medicine.

[6]  M. Kuiper,et al.  Acute posthypoxic myoclonus after cardiopulmonary resuscitation , 2012, BMC Neurology.

[7]  M. Mlynash,et al.  Sedation Confounds Outcome Prediction in Cardiac Arrest Survivors Treated with Hypothermia , 2011, Neurocritical care.

[8]  A. Hrõbjartsson,et al.  Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed. , 2011, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[9]  T. Roth,et al.  Neurophysiology of Sleep and Wakefulness: Basic Science and Clinical Implications , 2008, Current neuropharmacology.

[10]  S. Targum,et al.  The clinical global impressions scale: applying a research tool in clinical practice. , 2007, Psychiatry (Edgmont (Pa. : Township)).

[11]  E. Houdayer,et al.  Neurophysiology of myoclonus , 2006, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  G. B. Young,et al.  Practice Parameter: Prediction of outcome in comatose survivors after cardiopulmonary resuscitation (an evidence-based review) , 2006, Neurology.

[13]  M. Hallett,et al.  The Unified Myoclonus Rating Scale. , 2002, Advances in neurology.

[14]  F. Sharbrough,et al.  Prognostic value of myoclonus status in comatose survivors of cardiac arrest , 1994, Annals of neurology.

[15]  G. B. Young,et al.  The significance of myoclonic status epilepticus in postanoxic coma , 1990, Neurology.

[16]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.