Development of a Frugal, In Situ Sensor Implementing a Ratiometric Method for Continuous Monitoring of Turbidity in Natural Waters

Turbidity is a commonly used indicator of water quality in continental and marine waters and is mostly caused by suspended and colloidal particles such as organic and inorganic particles. Many methods are available for the measurement of turbidity, ranging from the Secchi disk to infrared light-based benchtop or in situ turbidimeters as well as acoustic methods. The operational methodologies of the large majority of turbidity instruments involve the physics of light scattering and absorption by suspended particles when light is passed through a sample. As such, in the case of in situ monitoring in water bodies, the measurement of turbidity is highly influenced by external light and biofouling. Our motivation for this project is to propose an open-source, low-cost in situ turbidity sensor with a suitable sensitivity and operating range to operate in low-to-medium-turbidity natural waters. This prototype device combines two angular photodetectors and two infrared light sources with different positions, resulting in two different types of light detection, namely nephelometric (i.e., scattering) and attenuation light, according to the ISO 7027 method. The mechanical design involves 3D-printed parts by stereolithography, which are compatible with commercially available waterproof enclosures, thus ensuring easy integration for future users. An effort was made to rely on mostly off-the-shelf electronic components to encourage replication of the system, with the use of a highly integrated photometric front-end commonly used in portable photoplethysmography systems. The sensor was tested in laboratory conditions against a commercial benchtop turbidimeter with Formazin standards. The monitoring results were analyzed, obtaining a linear trendline from 0 to 50 Nephelometric Turbidity Unit (NTU) and an accuracy of +/−0.4 NTU in the 0 to 10 NTU range with a response time of less than 100 ms.

[1]  Y. Weinstein,et al.  Observations of turbidity currents in a small, slope-confined submarine canyon in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea , 2023, Earth and Planetary Science Letters.

[2]  T. Stoesser,et al.  A methodology to predict the run-out distance of submarine landslides , 2023, Computers and Geotechnics.

[3]  A. Sattar,et al.  Implementation and Calibration of an IoT Light Attenuation Turbidity Sensor , 2022, Internet Things.

[4]  A. Nattestad,et al.  LED PEDD Discharge Photometry: Effects of Software Driven Measurements for Sensing Applications , 2022, Sensors.

[5]  A. Nattestad,et al.  Advances in Optical Based Turbidity Sensing Using LED Photometry (PEDD) , 2021, Sensors.

[6]  R. Davies‐Colley,et al.  Weak numerical comparability of ISO‐7027‐compliant nephelometers. Ramifications for turbidity measurement applications , 2021, Hydrological Processes.

[7]  Aufried T. M. Lenferink,et al.  PDMS Curing Inhibition on 3D-Printed Molds: Why? Also, How to Avoid It? , 2021, Analytical chemistry.

[8]  Wilfried Uhring,et al.  Comparison of Time Resolved Optical Turbidity Measurements for Water Monitoring to Standard Real-Time Techniques , 2021, Sensors.

[9]  Bryson Goto Hypnos board: A low-cost all-in-one solution for environment sensor power management, data storage, and task scheduling , 2021, HardwareX.

[10]  Qi Liu,et al.  A novel low-cost turbidity sensor for in-situ extraction in TCM using spectral components of transmitted and scattered light , 2020 .

[11]  Jarrod Trevathan,et al.  Towards the Development of an Affordable and Practical Light Attenuation Turbidity Sensor for Remote Near Real-Time Aquatic Monitoring , 2020, Sensors.

[12]  I. Black,et al.  OpenCTD: Construction and Operation , 2020 .

[13]  T Matos,et al.  Development of a Cost-Effective Optical Sensor for Continuous Monitoring of Turbidity and Suspended Particulate Matter in Marine Environment , 2019, Sensors.

[14]  A. Nightingale,et al.  A droplet microfluidic-based sensor for simultaneous in situ monitoring of nitrate and nitrite in natural waters. , 2019, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  David Gillett,et al.  A Low-Cost Continuous Turbidity Monitor , 2019, Sensors.

[16]  Graham K. Hargrave,et al.  A low-cost bench-top research device for turbidity measurement by radially distributed illumination intensity sensing at multiple wavelengths , 2019, HardwareX.

[17]  Jaime Lloret,et al.  Design and development of low cost smart turbidity sensor for water quality monitoring in fish farms , 2018 .

[18]  Michael Metzger,et al.  Low-Cost GRIN-Lens-Based Nephelometric Turbidity Sensing in the Range of 0.1–1000 NTU , 2018, Sensors.

[19]  M. Bruen,et al.  Measurement differences between turbidity instruments, and their implications for suspended sediment concentration and load calculations: A sensor inter-comparison study. , 2017, Journal of environmental management.

[20]  A. Parsons,et al.  A review of the principles of turbidity measurement , 2017 .

[21]  Daniel Kahn,et al.  An Affordable Open-Source Turbidimeter , 2014, Sensors.

[22]  Theofanis P. Lambrou,et al.  A low-cost system for real time monitoring and assessment of potable water quality at consumer sites , 2012, 2012 IEEE Sensors.

[23]  Ahmad Fairuz Omar,et al.  Turbidimeter Design and Analysis: A Review on Optical Fiber Sensors for the Measurement of Water Turbidity , 2009, Sensors.

[24]  E. Rice The preparation of formazin standards for nephelometry , 1976 .

[25]  Michael J. Sadar InstrumentatIon and best practIce technIques are key to effectIvely monItor turbIdIty In natural water bodIes Turbidity Measurement: A Simple, Effective Indicator of Water Quality Change , 2010 .

[26]  C. Anderson Chapter A6. Section 6.7. Turbidity , 2005 .

[27]  James W. O'Dell,et al.  METHOD 180.1 – DETERMINATION OF TURBIDITY BY NEPHELOMETRY , 1996 .