Evaluation of the effect of scatter correction on lesion detection in hepatic SPECT imaging

Various methods have been proposed to correct for the problems presented by scatter in images from single-photon computed tomography (SPECT). While improvement in quantitative accuracy has been reported with a variety of measures, the effect on the accuracy of lesion detection requires analysis of observer performance. Experiments were designed to evaluate the class of methods that correct for scatter by subtracting counts. An anthropomorphic phantom was used with Monte Carlo simulation to simulate liver imaging with labeled antibodies. The lesion was a 2.5-cm-diameter, spherical, "cold" tumor in the liver, a large, "warm" background. Ramp-filtered back-projection and non-iterative Chang attenuation compensation were used to approximate clinical practice. Perfect scatter rejection, defined as images containing only primary (non-scattered) photons, was selected as the ideal case. These images were compared with uncorrected images for conditions of both low and high scatter fractions (SF, the scatter-to-primary ratio), typical of Tc-99m and In-111, respectively. In addition, the dual photopeak window (DPW) method was tested in order to evaluate a non-ideal subtraction correction. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) experiments were conducted under signal-known-exactly conditions, with the area under the curve, A/sub z/, used as the index of accuracy. A statistically significant difference in detection was found only in a few cases, when scatter rejection was compared with no correction. Subtraction of a scatter estimate changes both contrast and noise, such that an improvement in quantitative accuracy does not necessarily provide improvement in detection accuracy. Corrections that approach scatter rejection conditions may offer some improvement in detection, particularly for cases of high SFs.

[1]  C E Metz,et al.  Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. , 1989, Investigative radiology.

[2]  J Brismar Understanding receiver-operating-characteristic curves: a graphic approach. , 1991, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  Lee-Tzuu Chang,et al.  A Method for Attenuation Correction in Radionuclide Computed Tomography , 1978, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[4]  Charles R. Harrell,et al.  High resolution anthropomorphic phantom for Monte Carlo analysis of internal radiation sources , 1990, [1990] Proceedings. Third Annual IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical Systems.

[5]  D J Vining,et al.  Receiver operating characteristic curves: a basic understanding. , 1992, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[6]  C. Metz Basic principles of ROC analysis. , 1978, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[7]  P B Hoffer,et al.  Computerized three-dimensional segmented human anatomy. , 1994, Medical physics.

[8]  D. Turner,et al.  An intuitive approach to receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. , 1978, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  M. S. Chesters,et al.  Human visual perception and ROC methodology in medical imaging. , 1992, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  F R Whitehead,et al.  Minimum detectable gray-scale differences in nuclear medicine images. , 1978, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  S Webb,et al.  A comparison of deconvolution and windowed subtraction techniques for scatter compensation in SPECT. , 1988, IEEE transactions on medical imaging.

[12]  Michael A. King,et al.  Window selection for dual photopeak window scatter correction in Tc-99m imaging , 1994 .

[13]  Michael A. King,et al.  Implementation and testing of the dual photopeak window scatter correction method on a multi-headed SPECT system , 1992, IEEE Conference on Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging.

[14]  M. Ljungberg,et al.  A Monte Carlo program for the simulation of scintillation camera characteristics. , 1989, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[15]  B. C. Penney,et al.  A scatter reduction method for In-111 scintigrams using five energy windows , 1991, Conference Record of the 1991 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference.

[16]  James J. Hamill,et al.  Scatter reduction with energy-weighted acquisition , 1989 .

[17]  Ronald J. Jaszczak,et al.  Scatter Compensation Techniques for SPECT , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[18]  A Todd-Pokropek,et al.  Assessment and comparison of three scatter correction techniques in single photon emission computed tomography. , 1988, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[19]  H H Barrett,et al.  Ideal versus human observer for long-tailed point spread functions: does deconvolution help? , 1991, Physics in medicine and biology.

[20]  M. King,et al.  Considerations for Cardiac Imaging with Indium-111-labeled Radiopharmaceuticals , 1989 .

[21]  J. Swets ROC analysis applied to the evaluation of medical imaging techniques. , 1979, Investigative radiology.

[22]  P F Judy,et al.  Evaluation of video gray-scale display. , 1992, Medical physics.

[23]  C E Metz,et al.  Quantification of failure to demonstrate statistical significance. The usefulness of confidence intervals. , 1993, Investigative radiology.

[24]  Activity quantitation in SPECT: a comparison of three attenuation correction methods in combination with pre-reconstruction restoration filtering , 1990 .

[25]  J. Hanley Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) methodology: the state of the art. , 1989, Critical reviews in diagnostic imaging.

[26]  I Buvat,et al.  Comparative assessment of nine scatter correction methods based on spectral analysis using Monte Carlo simulations. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[27]  Matt A. King,et al.  A dual-photopeak window method for scatter correction. , 1992, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[28]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Unified SNR analysis of medical imaging systems , 1985, Physics in medicine and biology.

[29]  P F Sharp,et al.  Assessment of energy-weighted acquisition in SPECT using ROC analysis. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[30]  J. Swets,et al.  Assessment of diagnostic technologies. , 1979, Science.

[31]  Kyle J. Myers,et al.  Model observers for assessment of image quality , 1993 .

[32]  C. Metz,et al.  A New Approach for Testing the Significance of Differences Between ROC Curves Measured from Correlated Data , 1984 .

[33]  G J Hademenos,et al.  Comparison of four scatter correction methods using Monte Carlo simulated source distributions. , 1994, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[34]  C. Metz ROC Methodology in Radiologic Imaging , 1986, Investigative radiology.