Domesticating design by a disenfranchised community

Many technologies afford functionalities that may be relevant to the daily lives of diverse groups of people but that does not necessarily mean that in all communities that they are mundane. Indeed our construction of domestication may reflect power relations and existing inequalities and its influence in design may exacerbate exclusion. We introduce a process to respond to the needs of Aboriginal women in designing systems to support community connectivitiy and preserve their heritage and some of the challenges it presents. We discuss designing technology probes to help us refine applications that can be subsumed into family and social life. We propose issues relating to rural-urban differences that arise when considering these users that have wider relevance for mundane technologies.

[1]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Yesterday’s tomorrows: notes on ubiquitous computing’s dominant vision , 2007, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[2]  Dianna Hardy,et al.  Searching heterogeneous and distributed maritime databases: A technology prototype , 2006 .

[3]  Allison Druin,et al.  Technology probes: inspiring design for and with families , 2003, CHI '03.

[4]  Daniel Fitton,et al.  Smart mobs and technology probes: evaluating texting at work , 2004 .

[5]  Marcy M. Allen,et al.  The Ever-Shifting Internet Population: A New Look At Internet Access and the Digital Divide, Amanda Lenhart (Ed.). The Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington, DC (2003) , 2005, Gov. Inf. Q..

[6]  Kenton O'Hara,et al.  Social coordination around a situated display appliance , 2003, CHI '03.

[7]  Steve Howard,et al.  Just what do the youth of today want? Technology appropriation by young people , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[8]  Karen L. Martin,et al.  Ways of knowing, being and doing: A theoretical framework and methods for indigenous and indigenist re‐search , 2003 .

[9]  M. Rouncefield,et al.  Whose Probe is it Anyway , 2005 .

[10]  M. Warschauer.  Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide , 2003 .

[11]  Gary Marsden,et al.  Evaluating the relevance of the “Real Access” criteria as a framework for rural HCI research , 2006 .

[12]  Lucy Suchman,et al.  Embodied Practices of Engineering Work , 2000 .

[13]  Geraldine Fitzpatrick,et al.  rk: Exploring founda , 1996 .

[14]  M. Christie,et al.  Computer Databases and Aboriginal Knowledge , 2004 .

[15]  Lucy Suchman.  Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication , 1987 .

[16]  Nicola J. Bidwell,et al.  The landscape's apprentice: lessons for place-centred design from grounding documentary , 2008, DIS '08.

[17]  Christian Beck,et al.  Using activity theory to develop a design framework for rural development , 2007, CHI Extended Abstracts.