Present‐day springtime high‐latitude surface albedo as a predictor of simulated climate sensitivity

[1] Simulations by the Community Atmosphere Model (CAM) and 15 other climate models suggest that climate sensitivity is linked to continental middle to high latitude present-day springtime albedo. We compare 1 x CO 2 and 2 x CO 2 CAM simulations against similar simulations with snow cover fraction purposely increased. Greater snow cover fraction leads to higher albedo and lower temperatures at 1 x CO 2 but has less influence at 2 x CO 2 when little snow remains due to global warming. This makes the simulation with higher albedo at 1 x CO 2 more sensitive to increased CO 2 , in agreement with past work. We show that the wide variation in simulated snow-albedo feedbacks and climate sensitivities among 15 other models correlates well with variations in the continental middle to high latitude present-day springtime albedo, in agreement with our CAM results. The development of more accurate snow and albedo parameterizations should improve model estimates of climate sensitivity.

[1]  T. Chase,et al.  Representing a new MODIS consistent land surface in the Community Land Model (CLM 3.0) , 2007 .

[2]  G. Meehl,et al.  General circulation model CO2 sensitivity experiments: Snow-sea ice albedo parameterizations and globally averaged surface air temperature , 1986 .

[3]  A. Hall,et al.  Using the current seasonal cycle to constrain snow albedo feedback in future climate change , 2006 .

[4]  Alex Hall,et al.  Assessing Snow Albedo Feedback in Simulated Climate Change , 2022 .

[5]  Andreas Roesch,et al.  Evaluation of surface albedo and snow cover in AR4 coupled climate models , 2005 .

[6]  J. Annan,et al.  Using multiple observationally‐based constraints to estimate climate sensitivity , 2006 .

[7]  R. Dickinson,et al.  The Community Land Model and Its Climate Statistics as a Component of the Community Climate System Model , 2006 .

[8]  Gerald L. Potter,et al.  A methodology for understanding and intercomparing atmospheric climate feedback processes in general circulation models , 1988 .

[9]  A. Hall,et al.  What Controls the Strength of Snow-Albedo Feedback? , 2007 .

[10]  Syukuro Manabe,et al.  The Effects of Changing the Solar Constant on the Climate of a General Circulation Model , 1975 .

[11]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  The Partitioning of Evapotranspiration into Transpiration, Soil Evaporation, and Canopy Evaporation in a GCM: Impacts on Land–Atmosphere Interaction , 2007 .

[12]  M. Winton.  Surface Albedo Feedback Estimates for the AR4 Climate Models , 2006 .

[13]  James J. Hack,et al.  The Climate Sensitivity of the Community Climate System Model Version 3 (CCSM3) , 2006 .

[14]  Zong-Liang Yang,et al.  Validation of the Snow Submodel of the Biosphere-Atmosphere Transfer Scheme with Russian Snow Cover and Meteorological Observational Data , 1997 .

[15]  S. Bony,et al.  How Well Do We Understand and Evaluate Climate Change Feedback Processes , 2006 .

[16]  S. Manabe,et al.  Influence of Oceanic Heat Transport Upon the Sensitivity of a Model Climate , 1984 .

[17]  Philip J. Rasch,et al.  Present-day climate forcing and response from black carbon in snow , 2006 .

[18]  W. Collins,et al.  The Formulation and Atmospheric Simulation of the Community Atmosphere Model Version 3 (CAM3) , 2006 .

[19]  S. Manabe,et al.  Radiative damping of annual variation in global mean surface temperature: comparison between observed and simulated feedback , 2005 .

[20]  A. Hall.  The role of surface albedo feedback in climate , 2004 .

[21]  Peter E. Thornton,et al.  Technical Description of the Community Land Model (CLM) , 2004 .

[22]  W. G. Strand,et al.  Climate Change Projections for the Twenty-First Century and Climate Change Commitment in the CCSM3 , 2006 .