The relationship between material properties, device design, and the sensitivity of resonant mechanical sensors

In this work we study three distinct resonant micromechanical sensor geometries and their ability to detect the addition of material at different locations on the devices. Small regions of gold were patterned on the resonators, and changes in frequency due to the presence of gold were measured as a function of position, device geometry, and the resonant mode. We have demonstrated the conditions under which micromechanical resonators are sensitive to the mechanical properties of added material as well as its mass and have quantified how these qualities have competing effects on resonant frequency using finite element analysis and analytical techniques. In cases where this competition significantly reduces frequency shift amplitudes, localized binding of the analyte is required, and we will compare different sensor designs and their frequency responses. When material is uniformly added to resonators, however, device geometry has little to no effect on sensitivity. While cantilevers may be the most commonly ...

[1]  H. Craighead,et al.  Micro- and nanomechanical sensors for environmental, chemical, and biological detection. , 2007, Lab on a chip.

[2]  Javier Tamayo,et al.  Effect of the adsorbate stiffness on the resonance response of microcantilever sensors , 2006 .

[3]  Christiane Ziegler,et al.  Cantilever-based biosensors , 2004, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[4]  Thomas Thundat,et al.  Adsorption-induced surface stress and its effects on resonance frequency of microcantilevers , 1995 .

[5]  Laura M. Lechuga,et al.  Nanomechanical biosensors: a new sensing tool , 2006 .

[6]  M. Ladisch,et al.  Anomalous resonance in a nanomechanical biosensor , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[7]  Jung Ho Park,et al.  In-situ quantitative analysis of a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) using a nanomechanical PZT cantilever. , 2004, Lab on a chip.

[8]  Javier Tamayo,et al.  Origin of the response of nanomechanical resonators to bacteria adsorption , 2006 .

[9]  Tae Song Kim,et al.  Label free novel electrical detection using micromachined PZT monolithic thin film cantilever for the detection of C-reactive protein. , 2004, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[10]  H. Craighead,et al.  Selective vibrational detachment of microspheres using optically excited in-plane motion of nanomechanical beams. , 2007, Nano letters.

[11]  H. Craighead,et al.  Enumeration of DNA molecules bound to a nanomechanical oscillator. , 2005, Nano letters.

[12]  T. Thundat,et al.  Bioassay of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) using microcantilevers , 2001, Nature Biotechnology.

[13]  H. Craighead,et al.  Single cell detection with micromechanical oscillators , 2001 .

[14]  K. Sutoh,et al.  Elasticity of mutant myosin subfragment-1 arranged on a functional silver surface. , 1999, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[15]  P K Hansma,et al.  Measuring the viscoelastic properties of human platelets with the atomic force microscope. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[16]  Xi-Qiao Feng,et al.  Effects of surface elasticity and residual surface tension on the natural frequency of microbeams , 2007 .

[17]  C. Neugebauer.  Tensile Properties of Thin, Evaporated Gold Films , 1960 .

[18]  C. Hierold,et al.  Nonconductive polymer microresonators actuated by the Kelvin polarization force , 2006 .

[19]  Nicolae Lobontiu,et al.  Modeling, design, and characterization of multisegment cantilevers for resonant mass detection , 2008 .

[20]  Jung Ho Park,et al.  Dominant surface stress driven by biomolecular interactions in the dynamical response of nanomechanical microcantilevers , 2006 .

[21]  K. Petersen,et al.  Young’s modulus measurements of thin films using micromechanics , 1979 .

[22]  John E. Sader,et al.  Effect of surface stress on the stiffness of cantilever plates. , 2007 .

[23]  Stephen P. Timoshenko,et al.  Vibration problems in engineering , 1928 .

[24]  Brian H. Houston,et al.  Shell-type micromechanical actuator and resonator , 2003 .

[25]  H. Craighead,et al.  Optical excitation of nanoelectromechanical oscillators , 2005 .

[26]  Anja Boisen,et al.  Effect of gold coating on the Q-factor of a resonant cantilever , 2005 .

[27]  Anja Boisen,et al.  Enhanced functionality of cantilever based mass sensors using higher modes , 2005 .

[28]  Harold G. Craighead,et al.  Fabrication of nanoelectromechanical systems in single crystal silicon using silicon on insulator substrates and electron beam lithography , 1997 .

[29]  Nicolae Lobontiu,et al.  Dynamics of Microelectromechanical Systems , 2007 .

[30]  H. Rothuizen,et al.  Translating biomolecular recognition into nanomechanics. , 2000, Science.

[31]  Heow Pueh Lee,et al.  Surface stress effects on the resonance properties of cantilever sensors , 2005 .

[32]  Shyamsunder Erramilli,et al.  Dynamical response of nanomechanical oscillators in immiscible viscous fluid for in vitro biomolecular recognition. , 2006, Physical review letters.

[33]  Alan R. Burns,et al.  Molecular Level Friction As Revealed with a Novel Scanning Probe , 1999 .

[34]  Robert J. Messinger,et al.  Making it stick: convection, reaction and diffusion in surface-based biosensors , 2008, Nature Biotechnology.

[35]  Amit K. Gupta,et al.  Single virus particle mass detection using microresonators with nanoscale thickness , 2004 .

[36]  Harry C. Gatos,et al.  Surface stress and the normal mode of vibration of thin crystals :GaAs , 1975 .

[37]  Jeevak M. Parpia,et al.  Nanomechanical resonant structures in silicon nitride: fabrication, operation and dissipation issues , 2002 .

[38]  M. Sepaniak,et al.  Cantilever transducers as a platform for chemical and biological sensors , 2004 .

[39]  R. N. Thurston,et al.  Effect of surface stress on the natural frequency of thin crystals , 1976 .