Estimation of parameters in geotechnical backanalysis — I. Maximum likelihood approach

The estimation of soil and rock parameters based on field instrumentation data is a common procedure in geomechanics. The use of system ident$cation and optimization techniques allows the performance of this type of analyses in a more rational and objective manner. In this paper a probabilistic formulation for the backanalysis problem is presented. The procedure described involves the evaluation of the measurement covariance matrices, which are derived for some geotechnical instruments used in jield instrumentation. The algorithm used to solve the mathematical problem of optimization is also presented, as well as its coupling to aJinite element code. The algorithm requires the computation of the sensitivity matrix, which can be evaluated “exactly” in terms of thefinite element method. Finally, a synthetic example, based on the excavation of a tunnel, is presented in which the elastic modulus E and the Ko parameter of the material are identljiedfrom measured displacements. The eflect of the number of measurements and their error structure is also discussed.

[1]  A. Huitson,et al.  Statistical Models in Applied Science. , 1976 .

[2]  Giulio Maier,et al.  Optimization Methods for Parametric Identification of Geotechnical Systems , 1982 .

[3]  Keisuke Kojima,et al.  Estimation of soil parameters based on monitored movement of subsoil under consolidation , 1984 .

[4]  Y. Baram,et al.  An information theoretic approach to dynamical systems modeling and identification , 1977, 1977 IEEE Conference on Decision and Control including the 16th Symposium on Adaptive Processes and A Special Symposium on Fuzzy Set Theory and Applications.

[5]  Charles L. Lawson,et al.  Solving least squares problems , 1976, Classics in applied mathematics.

[6]  H. Akaike.  A new look at the statistical model identification , 1974 .

[7]  L. E. Scales,et al.  Introduction to Non-Linear Optimization , 1985 .

[8]  J. Gillis,et al.  Linear Differential Operators , 1963 .

[9]  K. Terzaghi,et al.  Soil mechanics in engineering practice , 1948 .

[10]  Jesús Carrera,et al.  State of the Art of the Inverse Problem Applied to the Flow and Solute Transport Equations , 1988 .

[11]  D. Marquardt.  An Algorithm for Least-Squares Estimation of Nonlinear Parameters , 1963 .

[12]  Keisuke Kojima,et al.  ESTIMATION OF NONLINEAR CONSTITUTIVE PARAMETERS BASED ON MONITORED MOVEMENT OF SUBSOIL UNDER CONSOLIDATION , 1987 .

[13]  Giancarlo Gioda,et al.  Back analysis procedures for the interpretation of field measurements in geomechanics , 1987 .

[14]  P. Eykhoff.  System Identification Parameter and State Estimation , 1974 .

[15]  Giulio Maier,et al.  Direct search solution of an inverse problem in elastoplasticity: Identification of cohesion, friction angle andin situ stress by pressure tunnel tests , 1980 .

[16]  R. Fletcher.  Practical Methods of Optimization , 1988 .

[17]  Yusuke Honjo,et al.  PREDICTION OF SINGLE PILE SETTLEMENT BASED ON INVERSE ANALYSIS , 1993 .

[18]  Giulio Maier,et al.  Parameter estimation of a static geotechnical model using a Bayes' approach , 1983 .

[19]  R. Kashyap.  A Bayesian comparison of different classes of dynamic models using empirical data , 1977 .

[20]  C. Lawson,et al.  Solving least squares problems , 1976, Classics in applied mathematics.

[21]  Alberto Ledesma Villalba,et al.  Identificación de parámetros en geotecnia aplicación a la excavación de túneles , 1987 .