Comparing the legitimacy and effectiveness of global hard and soft law: An analytical framework

The international norms that are developed as tools of global governance can be placed on a continuum from traditional “hard law” treaties to the vaguest and voluntary “soft law.” In this article we develop an analytical framework for comparing norms on different positions along the continuum, thus for comparing international hard and soft law. We root the framework in both the rationalist and the constructivist paradigms of international relations by focusing on two overarching evaluative criteria: effectiveness and legitimacy. These broad concepts are divided into smaller building blocks encompassing mechanisms through which norms can exert influence; for example, by changing material incentives, identities, and building capacity, and by contributing to building source-based, procedural, and substantive legitimacy. We illustrate the applicability of the framework with three norm processes of varying degrees of “softness” in global climate governance.

[1]  B. Cashore,et al.  Can non-state global governance be legitimate? An analytical framework , 2007 .

[2]  Toope,et al.  Interactional International Law , 2001 .

[3]  Susan Park.  Theorizing Norm Diffusion Within International Organizations , 2006 .

[4]  A. Moravcsik.  Is there a ‘Democratic Deficit’ in World Politics? A Framework for Analysis , 2004, Government and Opposition.

[5]  R. Eckersley.  Ambushed: The Kyoto Protocol, the Bush Administration's Climate Policy and the Erosion of Legitimacy , 2007 .

[6]  R. Howse,et al.  Enhancing WTO Legitimacy: Constitutionalization or Global Subsidiarity? , 2003 .

[7]  J. Rosenau.  Governing the ungovernable: The challenge of a global disaggregation of authority , 2007 .

[8]  Jeremy Wates,et al.  The Aarhus Convention: a Driving Force for Environmental Democracy , 2005 .

[9]  Ronald B. Mitchell,et al.  Sources of Transparency: Information Systems in International Regimes , 1998 .

[10]  F. Scharpf,et al.  Notes toward a theory of multi-level governing in Europe , 2001 .

[11]  N. Matz.  Financial Institutions between Effectiveness and Legitimacy – A Legal Analysis of the World Bank, Global Environment Facility and Prototype Carbon Fund , 2005 .

[12]  Alexander Wendt,et al.  Driving with the Rearview Mirror: On the Rational Science of Institutional Design , 2001, International Organization.

[13]  D. Lehmkuhl,et al.  Law and legalization in transnational relations , 2007 .

[14]  David Held.  Democratic Accountability and Political Effectiveness from a Cosmopolitan Perspective , 2004, Government and Opposition.

[15]  Michael Zürn,et al.  Global Governance and Legitimacy Problems , 2004, Government and Opposition.

[16]  Christine Chinkin,et al.  The Challenge of Soft Law: Development and Change in International Law , 1989, International and Comparative Law Quarterly.

[17]  Heikki Patomäki.  Problems of Democratizing Global Governance: Time, Space and the Emancipatory Process , 2003 .

[18]  J. Scholte,et al.  Civil society and democracy in global governance , 2002 .

[19]  Moshe Hirsch.  The Impact of International Law on International Cooperation: Compliance with international norms in the age of globalization: two theoretical perspectives , 2004 .

[20]  H. Koh.  Why Do Nations Obey International Law , 1997 .

[21]  Julia Black,et al.  Constructing and Contesting Legitimacy and Accountability in Polycentric Regulatory Regimes , 2008 .

[22]  J. Steffek,et al.  Global Governance, Participation and the Public Sphere , 2004, Government and Opposition.

[23]  Kenneth W. Abbott,et al.  Hard and Soft Law in International Governance , 2000, International Organization.

[24]  Stephen J. Toope,et al.  International Law and Constructivism: Elements of an International Theory of International Law , 2009 .

[25]  M. Finnemore,et al.  International Norm Dynamics and Political Change , 1998, International Organization.

[26]  Kenneth W. Abbott,et al.  The Concept of Legalization , 2000, International Organization.

[27]  Stephen J. Toope,et al.  Alternatives to “Legalization”: Richer Views of Law and Politics , 2001, International Organization.