Estimating Legislators' Preferred Points

This paper shows that agnostic spatial models that simultaneously attempt to estimate legislators' preferred points and ideological locations for the proposals on which they vote, such as the well-known NOMINATE model of Poole and Rosenthal, are not identified. The problem arises because the agnostic estimators inherit the granularity of the voting data and, so, cannot recapture the underlying continuous parameter space. I propose an alternative estimator that achieves identification by modeling the agenda.

[1]  Frederic M. Lord,et al.  Unbiased estimators of ability parameters, of their variance, and of their parallel-forms reliability , 1983 .

[2]  K. T. Poole,et al.  Patterns of congressional voting , 1991 .

[3]  Melvin R. Novick,et al.  Some latent train models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability , 1966 .

[4]  K. T. Poole,et al.  Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting , 1997 .

[5]  L. L. Thurstone,et al.  A method of scaling psychological and educational tests. , 1925 .

[6]  F. H. C. Marriott,et al.  BIAS IN THE ESTIMATION OF AUTOCORRELATIONS , 1954 .

[7]  Shelby J. Haberman,et al.  Maximum Likelihood Estimates in Exponential Response Models , 1977 .

[8]  Henry E. Brady Traits versus Issues: Factor versus Ideal-Point Analysis of Candidate Thermometer Ratings , 1990, Political Analysis.

[9]  P. Schmidt,et al.  Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. , 1984 .

[10]  Gerhard H. Fischer,et al.  Derivations of the Rasch Model , 1995 .

[11]  Peter C. Ordeshook,et al.  A STATISTICAL MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING METHOD BASED ON THE SPATIAL THEORY OF VOTING , 1978 .

[12]  G. Rasch On General Laws and the Meaning of Measurement in Psychology , 1961 .

[13]  Krishna K Ladha,et al.  A spatial model of legislative voting with perceptual error , 1991 .

[14]  Hedley Rees,et al.  Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. , 1985 .

[15]  Donald E. Stokes,et al.  Spatial Models of Party Competition , 1963, American Political Science Review.