Congruence of Prior Knowledge and Text Information as a Factor in the Reading Comprehension of Middle-Grade Children. Technical Report #16.

Two studies were conducted that investigated congruency of text information with prior knowledge as a factor in the reading comprehension of middle grade children. In both studies children read texts containing both congruent and incongruent information. New information that contradicted common beliefs of children similar to the subjects of the study was labelled incongruent information while new information similar to the prior knowledge of the children was labelled congruent. The purpose of the first study was to develop an instrumont to identify fifth and sixth-grade children who overrely on prior knowledge in their comprehension of text. Large differences between comprehension scores for congruent and incongruent information were considered an indication of the use of a strategy of overreliance on prior knowledge. A group was identified that found congruent information much easier than incongruent Ingormacion. Although many of the differences found could be attributed to chance factors, similarities among the children in the group suggested that part of the variance of the difference score might ba attributable to special difficulty that these children experienced with incongruent information. The purpose of the second study was to investigate how degree of congruency interacts with degree of explicitness and level of staging of information to affect the reading comprehension of fourth and

[1]  M. Frostig,et al.  The Frostig program for the development of visual perception : teacher's guide , 1964 .

[2]  Nila Banton Smith,et al.  Reading Instruction In the Elementary School. , 1970 .

[3]  P. David Pearson The Effect of Background Knowledge on Young Children's Comprehension of Explicit and Implicit Information , 1979 .

[4]  W. Cromer The difference model: a new explanation for some reading difficulties. , 1970, Journal of educational psychology.

[5]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  On putting apples into bottles — A problem of polysemy , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[6]  A. Kaufman Intelligent testing with the WISC-R , 1979 .

[7]  David K. Dickinson,et al.  Story comprehension and recall in dyslexic students , 1979 .

[8]  Rand J. Spiro,et al.  Superficial Processing of Explicit Inferences in Text. Technical Report No. 60. , 1977 .

[9]  Rand J. Spiro,et al.  Etiology of reading comprehension style , 1979 .

[10]  F. Craik,et al.  Levels of Pro-cessing: A Framework for Memory Research , 1975 .

[11]  Helmer R. Myklebust,et al.  Learning Disabilities: Educational Principles and Practices , 1967 .

[12]  Charles A. Perfetti,et al.  Discourse Comprehension and Sources of Individual Differences. , 1977 .

[13]  David R. Olson,et al.  Memory and inference in the comprehension of oral and written discourse , 1978 .

[14]  W. Kintsch,et al.  The representation of meaning in memory , 1974 .

[15]  Robert J. Tierney,et al.  The Discourse Processing Operations of Children. , 1978 .

[16]  Carl H Frederiksen,et al.  Effects of context-induced processing operations on semantic information acquired from discourse , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[17]  Philip B. Gough,et al.  One Second of Reading. , 1972 .

[18]  William D Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  Walter Kintsch,et al.  On modeling comprehension. , 1979 .