The Validity of the Panoramic Radiography in Evaluating the Topographic Relationship between Mandibular Canal and Impacted Third Molars in Comparison with Cone Beam CT-scan

Article history: Received: 17 Oct 2010 Accepted: 16 Nov 2010 Available online: 17 Apr 2011 ZJRMS 2013; 15(1): 28-33 Background: The purpose of this study is to compare the validity of panoramic radiography with CBCT (Cone Beam Computed Tomography) in the assessment of the relationship between the mandibular third molar and the mandibular canal. Materials and Methods: In this descriptive-analytical study, 80 mandibular third molars were extracted from 48 patients. On the panoramic radiography (PR) there was a close relationship between the root tooth and mandibular canal in all the teeth. The teeth were classified on the basis of six radiographic markers in panoramic radiographs (superimposition, root opacity/darkening of the roots, root deflection, diversion of the canal, interruption of the cortical border of the canal and narrowing of the canal). Then, the relationship between the markers and presence or absence of contact is CBCT was investigated. Results: The superimposition marker in the interrupted group and group with intact border was significantly higher than the group with no cortical border. The interruption of the cortical border of the canal and increased radiolucency marker were significantly higher in no-cortical border group than the other two groups. As to the other three markers (diversion of the canal, narrowing of the canal and root diversion) due to the low frequency in the 80 teeth, the findings were presented in a descriptive manner. Conclusion: Presence or absence of a radiological sign in panoramic radiography will not properly predict the existence of a close relationship with third molar and it is suggested that in case of tooth-canal overlapping either as a superimposition or as other aforesaid markers, the patient should be referred for CBCT assessment regarding the additional and useful information provided by CBCT. Copyright © 2013 Zahedan University of Medical Sciences. All rights reserved.

[1]  S. Bergé,et al.  Position of the impacted third molar in relation to the mandibular canal. Diagnostic accuracy of cone beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiography. , 2009, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[2]  T. Kurabayashi,et al.  Correlation of darkening of impacted mandibular third molar root on digital panoramic images with cone beam computed tomography findings. , 2009, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[3]  L. Flygare,et al.  Preoperative imaging procedures for lower wisdom teeth removal , 2008, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[4]  Kaoru Kobayashi,et al.  Third molar position: reliability of panoramic radiography. , 2007, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[5]  T. Kurabayashi,et al.  A comparative study of cone-beam computed tomography and conventional panoramic radiography in assessing the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. , 2007, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[6]  L. Flygare,et al.  Pre-operative radiographic evaluation of lower third molars with computed tomography. , 2006 .

[7]  N. Savage,et al.  Narrowing of the inferior dental canal in relation to the lower third molars , 2005 .

[8]  M. August,et al.  Panoramic radiographic findings as predictors of inferior alveolar nerve exposure following third molar extraction. , 2005, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[9]  M. R. Gatto,et al.  Reliability of panoramic radiography in evaluating the topographic relationship between the mandibular canal and impacted third molars. , 2004, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[10]  G. Bell.  Use of dental panoramic tomographs to predict the relation between mandibular third molar teeth and the inferior alveolar nerve. Radiological and surgical findings, and clinical outcome. , 2004, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[11]  Toshiyuki Ogasawara,et al.  Preoperative assessment of the relationship between the mandibular third molar and the mandibular canal by axial computed tomography with coronal and sagittal reconstruction. , 2003, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[12]  M Cohnen,et al.  A comparison of conventional panoramic radiographs with volumetric computed tomography images in the preoperative assessment of impacted mandibular third molars. , 2002, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[13]  Y. Nakagawa,et al.  Preoperative application of limited cone beam computerized tomography as an assessment tool before minor oral surgery. , 2002, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[14]  R. D. Morant,et al.  Array-projection geometry and depth discrimination with Tuned-Aperture Computed Tomography for assessing the relationship between tooth roots and the inferior alveolar canal. , 2001, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[15]  G. Kaeppler.  Conventional cross-sectional tomographic evaluation of mandibular third molars. , 2000, Quintessence international.

[16]  E. Tammisalo,et al.  Stereographic assessment of mandibular canal in relation to the roots of impacted lower third molar using multiprojection narrow beam radiography. , 1992, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[17]  R. Langlais,et al.  Cross-sectional tomography. A diagnostic technique for determining the buccolingual relationship of impacted mandibular third molars and the inferior alveolar neurovascular bundle. , 1990, Oral surgery, oral medicine, and oral pathology.

[18]  J P Rood,et al.  The radiological prediction of inferior alveolar nerve injury during third molar surgery. , 1990, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[19]  C. Lindh,et al.  Radiologic examination for location of the mandibular canal: a comparison between panoramic radiography and conventional tomography. , 1989, The International journal of oral & maxillofacial implants.