Quantitative assessment of collision risk influence factors in the Tianjin port

Abstract Collision between ships is one of the dominant types of accident in the approaches to Tianjin port, which accounts for 65% of all types of accidents. This paper presents a quantitative maritime risk assessment methodology by using Bayesian rules and least squares estimation method to identify the dominant factors that contribute to collision accidents. The approach relates accident data with traffic data by pairwise comparisons between the collision risks under different navigation conditions and different types of ships. The results indicate that small ships with lengths smaller than 100 m have a collision risk much higher than larger ships. The results also indicate that safety improvement of working ships and oil tankers is one of the most effective ways to reduce the overall collision risk. The collision probability of the ships without a pilot is about 9 times higher than those with a pilot. The analysis also shows that further steps should be undertaken to reduce risk during strong wind conditions to at least the same level of the normal conditions. The results obtained are useful for managers to support their decisions to control collision risk.

[1]  Asim Kumar Sen,et al.  Sustainable Business Model for Shipping Industry , 2015 .

[2]  C. Guedes Soares,et al.  Classification of human errors in grounding and collision accidents using the TRACEr taxonomy , 2016 .

[3]  Shenping Hu,et al.  Formal safety assessment based on relative risks model in ship navigation , 2007, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[4]  Min Xie,et al.  Accident risk assessment in marine transportation via Markov modelling and Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation , 2014 .

[5]  P. Silveira,et al.  Use of AIS Data to Characterise Marine Traffic Patterns and Ship Collision Risk off the Coast of Portugal , 2013, Journal of Navigation.

[6]  Martin Hassel,et al.  Underreporting of maritime accidents to vessel accident databases. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[7]  Jin Wang,et al.  Fuzzy Rule-Based Bayesian Reasoning Approach for Prioritization of Failures in FMEA , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Reliability.

[8]  Qiang Meng,et al.  An Overview of Maritime Waterway Quantitative Risk Assessment Models , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[9]  Xinping Yan,et al.  Effectiveness of maritime safety control in different navigation zones using a spatial sequential DEA model: Yangtze River case. , 2015, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[10]  Jin Wang,et al.  Incorporation of formal safety assessment and Bayesian network in navigational risk estimation of the Yangtze River , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[11]  Joaquim Casal,et al.  Predicting the frequency of accidents in port areas by developing event trees from historical analysis , 2003 .

[12]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  On a systematic perspective on risk for formal safety assessment (FSA) , 2014, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[13]  Manchun Li,et al.  Safety Assessment of Shipping Routes in the South China Sea Based on the Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2014 .

[14]  Xinping Yan,et al.  Safety Management Performance Assessment for Maritime Safety Administration (MSA) by Using Generalized Belief Rule Base Methodology , 2014 .

[15]  Maria Hänninen,et al.  Bayesian networks for maritime traffic accident prevention: benefits and challenges. , 2014, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Paolo Trucco,et al.  A Bayesian Belief Network modelling of organisational factors in risk analysis: A case study in maritime transportation , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[17]  Carlos Guedes Soares,et al.  Causal factors in accidents of high-speed craft and conventional ocean-going vessels , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[18]  Ulf Paulsson,et al.  A grounded theory model for analysis of marine accidents. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[19]  Li Suyi,et al.  Ship collision risk assessment for the Singapore Strait. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  Ian Jenkinson,et al.  An Offshore Risk Analysis Method Using Fuzzy Bayesian Network , 2009 .

[21]  Pedro Antão,et al.  Fault-tree models of accident scenarios of RoPax vessels , 2006, Int. J. Autom. Comput..

[22]  Panagiotis Sotiralis,et al.  Incorporation of human factors into ship collision risk models focusing on human centred design aspects , 2016, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[23]  Rolf Skjong,et al.  Under-reporting of maritime accidents. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[24]  Carlos Guedes Soares,et al.  Risk assessment in maritime transportation , 2001, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[25]  Floris Goerlandt,et al.  On the Reliability and Validity of Ship–Ship Collision Risk Analysis in Light of Different Perspectives on Risk , 2014 .

[26]  Jason R. W. Merrick,et al.  Speaking the Truth in Maritime Risk Assessment , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[27]  Jason R. W. Merrick,et al.  A Bayesian paired comparison approach for relative accident probability assessment with covariate information , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[28]  Metin Celik,et al.  Application of fuzzy extended AHP methodology on shipping registry selection: The case of Turkish maritime industry , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[29]  Marcelo Ramos Martins,et al.  Application of Bayesian Belief networks to the human reliability analysis of an oil tanker operation focusing on collision accidents , 2013, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[30]  Jin Wang,et al.  Bayesian network with quantitative input for maritime risk analysis , 2014 .

[31]  I Jenkinson,et al.  A methodology to model causal relationships on offshore safety assessment focusing on human and organizational factors. , 2008, Journal of safety research.

[32]  Christos A. Kontovas,et al.  Formal safety assessment: A critical review , 2009 .

[33]  Jan Erik Vinnem,et al.  On the use of risk acceptance criteria in the offshore oil and gas industry , 2005, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[34]  Seok Yoon,et al.  A Note on the Marine Policy of the Ferry Sewol-Ho Disaster in Korea , 2015 .

[35]  Thomas V Perneger,et al.  The Swiss cheese model of safety incidents: are there holes in the metaphor? , 2005, BMC health services research.

[36]  S. Geer A New Approach to Least-Squares Estimation, with Applications , 1986 .

[37]  Jakub Montewka,et al.  Probability modelling of vessel collisions , 2010, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[38]  Floris Goerlandt,et al.  Traffic simulation based ship collision probability modeling , 2011, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..