Frequency Estimation of Multifrequency Signals Based on the 3-Point and 4-Point Spectrum Interpolation for Short Measurement Time in PV Systems

Multifrequency signals occur e.g. in photovoltaic systems where the estimation of frequency is very important to drive the inverter. This paper presents an comparison of the estimation method based on the FFT procedure, MSD time windows and the 3-point/4-point spectrum interpolation. Results show that more accurate (up to several times) is the method with three points of the spectrum taken into calculations. Simulations were performed for the tested signal without disturbances, for harmonic components and for AWGN noise for various measurement parameters. The method is very accurate and very fast (even below one cycle of the tested signal). The accuracy for the 3-point interpolation is approximately $2\times 10^{\wedge}-8 Hz/Hz$ for 128 samples in the measurement window and 1.2 cycle of the signal. Obtained results can be very useful because they show the accuracy in various measurement conditions and also show that the method with three points of the signal spectrum is optimal in the tested range up to two measured signal cycles.

[1]  Dariusz Kania,et al.  Interpolated-DFT-Based Fast and Accurate Amplitude and Phase Estimation for the Control of Power , 2016, ArXiv.

[2]  Fernando S. Schlindwein,et al.  Comparison of computation time for estimation of dominant frequency of atrial electrograms: Fast fourier transform, blackman tukey, autoregressive and multiple signal classification , 2010 .

[3]  Dariusz Kania,et al.  Interpolated-DFT-Based Fast and Accurate Frequency Estimation for the Control of Power , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics.

[4]  Janusz Mroczka,et al.  Prony’S Method Used for Testing Harmonics and Interharmonics in Electrical Power Systems , 2012 .

[5]  Dariusz Kania,et al.  Influence of A/D quantization in an interpolated DFT based system of power control with a small delay , 2014 .

[6]  Janusz Mroczka,et al.  Short Time Algorithm of Power Waveforms Fundamental Harmonic Estimation With Use of Prony's Methods , 2011 .

[7]  Erdogan Dilaveroglu,et al.  Nonmatrix Cramer-Rao bound expressions for high-resolution frequency estimators , 1998, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[8]  Jozef Borkowski,et al.  LIDFT method with classic data windows and zero padding in multifrequency signal analysis , 2010 .

[9]  Tadeusz Lobos,et al.  High-resolution spectrum-estimation methods for signal analysis in power systems , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[10]  Cagatay Candan,et al.  Analysis and Further Improvement of Fine Resolution Frequency Estimation Method From Three DFT Samples , 2013, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[11]  Janusz Mroczka,et al.  VARIABLE-FREQUENCY PRONY METHOD IN THE ANALYSIS OF ELECTRICAL POWER QUALITY , 2012 .

[12]  D. Belega,et al.  Influence of the noise on the amplitude estimation of a sine-wave by the three-point Interpolated DFT method , 2010, 2010 4th International Symposium on Communications, Control and Signal Processing (ISCCSP).

[13]  G. G. Stokes "J." , 1890, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[14]  Peter Händel,et al.  Properties of the IEEE-STD-1057 four-parameter sine wave fit algorithm , 2000, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas..

[15]  Yu Wang,et al.  Multipoint interpolated DFT for sine waves in short records with DC components , 2017, Signal Process..