Weighting with Life Cycle Assessment and Cradle to Cradle: A Methodology for Global Sustainability Design

Sustainable product design uses methodologies focused on eco-effectiveness and eco-efficiency for the proposal of innovative technological solutions and for the control of environmental impacts during the product life cycle. One of the main drawbacks of such techniques is their qualitative nature, associated with a decision-making process that is sometimes arbitrary, or with unverifiable data; this means that several complementary tools are currently being used to reduce the error in the results obtained. This situation makes the unification of procedures necessary. In this context, this research develops a methodology for the sustainable design of industrial products that integrates life cycle assessment (in its environmental, economic and social application) and cradle-to-cradle techniques. For this purpose, a new assessment process is proposed, based on damage, developing LCA+C2C endpoint indicators. The methodology is subsequently verified in a case study of products for sustainable mobility (city trike electric). The results show that an integrated LCA+C2C assessment can help to propose more balanced sustainable strategies and would be a suitable method to measure tradeoffs between economic, social and environmental results, for practical purposes and future redesigns. The unified method provides a procedure to design a solution with a trade-off between eco-efficient and eco-effective criteria; it also simplifies the design phases, facilitates the interpretation of the results and provides a quantitative scope to the cradle-to-cradle framework.

[1]  M. Braungart,et al.  Cradle-to-cradle design: creating healthy emissions - a strategy for eco-effective product and system design , 2007 .

[2]  Ramon Farreny,et al.  Are Cradle to Cradle certified products environmentally preferable? Analysis from an LCA approach , 2015 .

[3]  Stig Irving Olsen,et al.  Combining Eco‐Efficiency and Eco‐Effectiveness for Continuous Loop Beverage Packaging Systems: Lessons from the Carlsberg Circular Community , 2017 .

[4]  Giancarlo Barbiroli,et al.  Eco-efficiency or/and eco-effectiveness? Shifting to innovative paradigms for resource productivity , 2006 .

[5]  Y. Charabi,et al.  Ecological and Human Health Risk Assessment , 2018, Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation.

[6]  Nii Ankrah,et al.  Cradle to cradle implementation in business sites and the perspectives of tenant stakeholders , 2015 .

[7]  José Dinis Silvestre,et al.  Environmental, energetic and economic life-cycle assessment from " cradle to cradle " (3E-C2C) of buildings assemblies , 2011 .

[8]  Feliciane Andrade Brehm,et al.  Recycling of contaminated metallic chip based on eco-efficiency and eco-effectiveness approaches , 2017 .

[9]  Enes Ünal,et al.  A taxonomy of circular economy implementation strategies for manufacturing firms: Analysis of 391 cradle-to-cradle products , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[10]  Ken Alston,et al.  Cradle to cradle design initiatives: lessons and opportunities for Prevention through Design (PtD). , 2008, Journal of safety research.

[11]  Antonio Carlos de Francisco,et al.  Past and future of Social Life Cycle Assessment: Historical evolution and research trends , 2020 .

[12]  Sajed M. Abukhader Eco-efficiency in the era of electronic commerce – should ‘Eco-Effectiveness’ approach be adopted? , 2008 .

[13]  Anders Bjørn,et al.  Cradle to Cradle and LCA – is there a Conflict? , 2011 .

[14]  Cheryl K. Contant,et al.  Defining and analyzing cumulative environmental impacts , 1991 .

[15]  S. Ramakrishna,et al.  Biobased Products and Life Cycle Assessment in the Context of Circular Economy and Sustainability , 2020, Materials Circular Economy.

[16]  Gui-Ling Wang,et al.  Integrating eco-efficiency and eco-effectiveness into the design of sustainable industrial systems in China , 2011 .

[17]  M. Hauschild,et al.  Absolute versus Relative Environmental Sustainability , 2013 .

[18]  Andrea Raggi,et al.  Implementing a new model to measure and assess eco-effectiveness as an indicator of sustainability , 2008 .

[19]  M. Finkbeiner,et al.  Characterization of the Cradle to Cradle Certified™ Products Program in the Context of Eco-labels and Environmental Declarations , 2018 .

[20]  Leonardo Rosado,et al.  Circular economy – From review of theories and practices to development of implementation tools , 2017, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[21]  M. Csutora From eco-efficiency to eco-effectiveness? The policy-performance paradox , 2011 .

[22]  Wai K. Chong,et al.  Integrating G2G, C2C and resource flow analysis into life cycle assessment framework: A case of construction steel's resource loop , 2015 .

[23]  Marten E. Toxopeus,et al.  Cradle to Cradle: Effective Vision vs. Efficient Practice?☆ , 2015 .

[24]  Martin Tenpierik,et al.  Continuing the building's cycles: A literature review and analysis of current systems theories in comparison with the theory of Cradle to Cradle , 2014 .

[25]  R. J. Geldermans Design for Change and Circularity – Accommodating Circular Material & Product Flows in Construction , 2016 .

[26]  Michael Z. Hauschild,et al.  Better – But is it Good Enough? On the Need to Consider Both Eco-efficiency and Eco-effectiveness to Gauge Industrial Sustainability , 2015 .

[27]  Joost G. Vogtländer,et al.  The virtual eco-costs ‘99 A single LCA-based indicator for sustainability and the eco-costs-value ratio (EVR) model for economic allocation , 2001 .

[28]  E. Lozza,et al.  New Trends and Patterns in Sustainable Consumption: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda , 2020 .

[29]  T. McAloone,et al.  A Trade-Off Navigation Framework as a Decision Support for Conflicting Sustainability Indicators within Circular Economy Implementation in the Manufacturing Industry , 2020 .

[30]  Sameer Kumar,et al.  Cradle to cradle: Reverse logistics strategies and opportunities across three industry sectors , 2008 .

[31]  S. Hallstedt,et al.  Sustainabilty integration in product portfolio for sustainable development: Findings from the industry , 2020 .

[32]  J. Brito,et al.  Environmental, economic and energy life cycle assessment “from cradle to cradle” (3E-C2C) of flat roofs , 2020 .

[33]  Denis Kurle,et al.  The Positive Impact Factory–Transition from Eco-efficiency to Eco–effectiveness Strategies in Manufacturing☆ , 2015 .

[34]  Michael H. Huesemann,et al.  The failure of eco‐efficiency to guarantee sustainability: Future challenges for industrial ecology , 2004 .

[35]  Bin He,et al.  Product Sustainable Design: A Review From the Environmental, Economic, and Social Aspects , 2020, J. Comput. Inf. Sci. Eng..

[36]  Daniel Jugend,et al.  Framework proposal for ecodesign integration on product portfolio management , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[37]  Chang-Ping Yu,et al.  Using material/substance flow analysis to support sustainable development assessment: A literature review and outlook , 2012 .

[38]  Gilbert Silvius,et al.  Cradle-to-Cradle in Project Management , 2021 .

[39]  Leo Baas,et al.  Cleaner Production and Industrial Ecology: A Dire Need for 21st Century Manufacturing , 2008 .

[40]  Piya Kerdlap,et al.  Life Cycle Costing: Methodology and Applications in a Circular Economy , 2020, An Introduction to Circular Economy.

[41]  B. Czyżewski,et al.  Approaching environmental sustainability of agriculture: environmental burden, eco-efficiency or eco-effectiveness , 2019, Agricultural Economics (Zemědělská ekonomika).

[42]  David Hunkeler,et al.  Environmental life-cycle costing: a code of practice , 2011 .

[43]  Erwin M. Schau,et al.  Towards Life Cycle Sustainability Assessment , 2010 .