Modeling the Impact of Lesions in the Human Brain

Lesions of anatomical brain networks result in functional disturbances of brain systems and behavior which depend sensitively, often unpredictably, on the lesion site. The availability of whole-brain maps of structural connections within the human cerebrum and our increased understanding of the physiology and large-scale dynamics of cortical networks allow us to investigate the functional consequences of focal brain lesions in a computational model. We simulate the dynamic effects of lesions placed in different regions of the cerebral cortex by recording changes in the pattern of endogenous (“resting-state”) neural activity. We find that lesions produce specific patterns of altered functional connectivity among distant regions of cortex, often affecting both cortical hemispheres. The magnitude of these dynamic effects depends on the lesion location and is partly predicted by structural network properties of the lesion site. In the model, lesions along the cortical midline and in the vicinity of the temporo-parietal junction result in large and widely distributed changes in functional connectivity, while lesions of primary sensory or motor regions remain more localized. The model suggests that dynamic lesion effects can be predicted on the basis of specific network measures of structural brain networks and that these effects may be related to known behavioral and cognitive consequences of brain lesions.

[1]  Keith A. Johnson,et al.  Cortical Hubs Revealed by Intrinsic Functional Connectivity: Mapping, Assessment of Stability, and Relation to Alzheimer's Disease , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  Peter Andras,et al.  Simulation of robustness against lesions of cortical networks , 2007, The European journal of neuroscience.

[3]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Lethality and centrality in protein networks , 2001, Nature.

[4]  Biyu J. He,et al.  Loss of Resting Interhemispheric Functional Connectivity after Complete Section of the Corpus Callosum , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  M P Young,et al.  On imputing function to structure from the behavioural effects of brain lesions. , 2000, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[6]  O. Sporns,et al.  Identification and Classification of Hubs in Brain Networks , 2007, PloS one.

[7]  C. Monakow,et al.  Die Lokalisation im Grosshirn und der Abbau der Funktion durch kortikale Herde , 1914 .

[8]  S. Ferber,et al.  Spatial awareness is a function of the temporal not the posterior parietal lobe , 2001, Nature.

[9]  Leonard M. Freeman,et al.  A set of measures of centrality based upon betweenness , 1977 .

[10]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  The Human Connectome: A Structural Description of the Human Brain , 2005, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[11]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Measuring brain connectivity: Diffusion tensor imaging validates resting state temporal correlations , 2008, NeuroImage.

[12]  D. Schacter,et al.  The Brain's Default Network , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[13]  D. G. Watts,et al.  Spectral analysis and its applications , 1968 .

[14]  M. Posner,et al.  Cognitive and emotional influences in anterior cingulate cortex , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  E. Bullmore,et al.  A Resilient, Low-Frequency, Small-World Human Brain Functional Network with Highly Connected Association Cortical Hubs , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Mapping anatomical connectivity patterns of human cerebral cortex using in vivo diffusion tensor imaging tractography. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[17]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[18]  Jean-Francois Mangin,et al.  Connectivity-Based Parcellation of the Cortical Mantle Using q-Ball Diffusion Imaging , 2008, Int. J. Biomed. Imaging.

[19]  Jonathan S. Adelstein,et al.  Residual functional connectivity in the split-brain revealed with resting-state functional MRI , 2008, Neuroreport.

[20]  S. Low,et al.  The "robust yet fragile" nature of the Internet. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[21]  Michael Breakspear,et al.  Simulation of neuronal death and network recovery in a computational model of distributed cortical activity. , 2009, The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry.

[22]  O. Sporns,et al.  Mapping the Structural Core of Human Cerebral Cortex , 2008, PLoS biology.

[23]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Modulation of excitatory synaptic coupling facilitates synchronization and complex dynamics in a biophysical model of neuronal dynamics , 2003, Network.

[24]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Network structure of cerebral cortex shapes functional connectivity on multiple time scales , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  P. Basser Diffusion MRI: From Quantitative Measurement to In vivo Neuroanatomy , 2009 .

[26]  D. Neary Lesion Analysis in Neuropsychology , 1990 .

[27]  O Sporns,et al.  Predicting human resting-state functional connectivity from structural connectivity , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[28]  Marcus Kaiser,et al.  Edge vulnerability in neural and metabolic networks , 2004, Biological Cybernetics.

[29]  Patrick C Phillips,et al.  Network thinking in ecology and evolution. , 2005, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[30]  Viktor K. Jirsa,et al.  Noise during Rest Enables the Exploration of the Brain's Dynamic Repertoire , 2008, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[31]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[32]  V Latora,et al.  Efficient behavior of small-world networks. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[33]  C. Stam,et al.  Small‐world properties of nonlinear brain activity in schizophrenia , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[34]  Biyu J. He,et al.  Breakdown of Functional Connectivity in Frontoparietal Networks Underlies Behavioral Deficits in Spatial Neglect , 2007, Neuron.

[35]  A. Damasio The feeling of what happens , 2001 .

[36]  R. J. Sellar Stroke syndromes , 2004, Neuroradiology.

[37]  J. Gabrieli,et al.  Hyperactivity and hyperconnectivity of the default network in schizophrenia and in first-degree relatives of persons with schizophrenia , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[38]  M. Mesulam Principles of Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology , 2000 .

[39]  Lester Melie-García,et al.  Studying the human brain anatomical network via diffusion-weighted MRI and Graph Theory , 2008, NeuroImage.

[40]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[41]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Error and attack tolerance of complex networks , 2000, Nature.

[42]  P. Thiran,et al.  Mapping Human Whole-Brain Structural Networks with Diffusion MRI , 2007, PloS one.

[43]  O. Sporns,et al.  Dynamical consequences of lesions in cortical networks , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[44]  G L Shulman,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:A default mode of brain function , 2001 .

[45]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Nonlinear Responses in fMRI: The Balloon Model, Volterra Kernels, and Other Hemodynamics , 2000, NeuroImage.

[46]  Vinod Menon,et al.  Functional connectivity in the resting brain: A network analysis of the default mode hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  N. Geschwind Disconnexion syndromes in animals and man. I. , 1965, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[48]  C. Stam,et al.  Disturbed functional connectivity in brain tumour patients: Evaluation by graph analysis of synchronization matrices , 2006, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[49]  B. Horwitz,et al.  Functional connectivity of the angular gyrus in normal reading and dyslexia. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.