Investigating the light absorption in a single pass through the photoreceptor layer by means of the lipofuscin fluorescence

Reflection densitometry has been widely used to measure the density difference of the bleachable cone photopigments in human eyes. Most such measurements make a series of assumptions concerning the amount of scattered light to derive an estimate of the true cone photopigment density from the density difference measurements. The current study made three types of measurements of the light returning from the eye before and after bleaching: the amount of light returning in the "directed" reflection, which is a double-pass estimate of the cone photopigment density; the amount of light in undirected or diffuse reflection; and the amount of fluorescence from lipofuscin in the RPE, which provides a single-pass measurement of optical density difference. For a 1 deg foveally fixated field, the density difference estimates for the three measurements were 0.68, 0.21, and 0.22 respectively. The lipofuscin fluorescence was found to be unguided. The background density difference was non-negligible and very close to the single pass estimate from fluorescence. These measurements each involve potentially different pathways of light through the retina, and therefore place different constraints on models of these pathways. A simple model comparing the directional and the fluorescence optical densities produced retinal coverage estimates around 70-75%. Estimates of the shape factor of the single pass optical Stiles-Crawford effect were evaluated from the dark-adapted and bleached fluorescence measurements. The values were closer to those obtained from psychophysical methods than to the double pass optical Stiles-Crawford shape factors obtained directly from retinal reflectometry.

[1]  W. Rushton.  KINETICS OF CONE PIGMENTS MEASURED OBJECTIVELY ON THE LIVING HUMAN FOVEA , 1958, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[2]  C. Riva,et al.  Subfoveal choroidal blood flow in response to light-dark exposure. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  A. Elsner,et al.  Variations in photoreceptor directionally across the central retina. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[4]  J. van de Kraats,et al.  Imaging retinal densitometry with a confocal Scanning Laser Ophthalmoscope. , 1989, Vision research.

[5]  J. Read,et al.  Determination of human cone pigment density difference spectra in spatially resolved regions of the fovea , 1983, Vision Research.

[6]  D. Norren,et al.  The Pathways of Light Measured in Fundus Reflectometry , 1996, Vision Research.

[7]  F. Delori,et al.  A reflectometric technique for assessing photorecelptor alignment , 1995, Vision Research.

[8]  F. Delori.  Spectrophotometer for noninvasive measurement of intrinsic fluorescence and reflectance of the ocular fundus. , 1994, Applied optics.

[9]  W. Stiles,et al.  The Luminous Efficiency of Rays Entering the Eye Pupil at Different Points , 1933 .

[10]  S A Burns,et al.  Reflectometry with a scanning laser ophthalmoscope. , 1992, Applied optics.

[11]  F. Delori,et al.  Spectral reflectance of the human ocular fundus. , 1989, Applied optics.

[12]  C K Dorey,et al.  Age-related accumulation and spatial distribution of lipofuscin in RPE of normal subjects. , 2001, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[13]  G. Blokland,et al.  Directionality and alignment of the foveal receptors, assessed with light scattered from the human fundusin vivo , 1986, Vision Research.

[14]  A. Elsner,et al.  Mapping cone photopigment optical density. , 1993, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[15]  F. Delori,et al.  A model for assessment of cone directionality , 1997 .

[16]  D. Van Norren,et al.  Spectral reflectance of the human eye , 1986, Vision Research.

[17]  Susana Marcos,et al.  Foveal cone spacing and cone photopigment density difference: Objective measurements in the same subjects , 1997, Vision Research.

[18]  Gary D. Bernard,et al.  Averaging over the foveal receptor aperture curtails aliasing , 1983, Vision Research.

[19]  Tos T. J. M Berendschot,et al.  Fundus reflectance—historical and present ideas , 2003, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[20]  T. Berendschot,et al.  Slow optical changes in human photoreceptors induced by light. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[21]  Pablo Artal,et al.  Directional imaging of the retinal cone mosaic. , 2004, Optics letters.

[22]  C K Dorey,et al.  In vivo fluorescence of the ocular fundus exhibits retinal pigment epithelium lipofuscin characteristics. , 1995, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[23]  E Zrenner,et al.  Modifying a Rodenstock scanning laser ophthalmoscope for imaging densitometry. , 1997, Applied optics.

[24]  Light capture by human cones. , 1989, The Journal of physiology.

[25]  D. Norren,et al.  Local photoreceptor alignment measured with a scanning laser ophthalmoscope , 1997, Vision Research.

[26]  S A Burns,et al.  Direct measurement of human-cone-photoreceptor alignment. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[27]  S A Burns,et al.  Cone spacing and waveguide properties from cone directionality measurements. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[28]  G. V. van Blokland,et al.  Directionality and alignment of the foveal receptors, assessed with light scattered from the human fundus in vivo. , 1986, Vision research.

[29]  S A Burns,et al.  Model for cone directionality reflectometric measurements based on scattering. , 1998, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[30]  S A Burns,et al.  Comparison of cone directionality determined by psychophysical and reflectometric techniques. , 1999, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.