A method for atlas-based volumetric registration with surface constraints for optical bioluminescence tomography in small animal imaging

Atlases are normalized representations of anatomy that can provide a standard coordinate system for in vivo imaging studies. For Optical Bioluminescence Tomography (OBT) in small animals, the animal's surface topography can be reconstructed from structured light measurements, but internal anatomy is unavailable unless additional CT or MR images are acquired. We present a novel method for estimating the internal organ structure of a mouse by warping a labeled 3D volumetric mouse atlas with the constraint that the surfaces of the two should match. Surface-constrained harmonic maps used for this bijective warping are computed by minimizing the covariant harmonic energy. We demonstrate the application of this warping scheme in OBT, where scattering and absorption coefficients of tissue are functions of the internal anatomy and hence, better estimates of the organ structures can lead to a more accurate forward model resulting in improved source localization. We first estimated the subject's internal geometry using the atlas-based warping scheme. Then the mouse was tessellated and optical properties were assigned based on the estimated organ structure. Bioluminescent sources were simulated, an optical forward model was computed using a finite-element solver, and multispectral data were simulated. We evaluate the accuracy of the forward model computed using the warped atlas against that assuming a homogeneous mouse model. This is done by comparing each model against a 'true' optical forward model where the anatomy of the mouse is assumed known. We also evaluate the impact of anatomical alignment on bioluminescence source localization.

[1]  Yalin Wang,et al.  Volumetric Harmonic Map , 2003, Commun. Inf. Syst..

[2]  A. Chatziioannou,et al.  Tomographic bioluminescence imaging by use of a combined optical-PET (OPET) system: a computer simulation feasibility study , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Dinggang Shen,et al.  Deformable registration of cortical structures via hybrid volumetric and surface warping , 2004, NeuroImage.

[4]  R. Leahy,et al.  Hyperspectral and multispectral bioluminescence optical tomography for small animal imaging , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  M. Schweiger,et al.  A finite element approach for modeling photon transport in tissue. , 1993, Medical physics.

[6]  Ge Wang,et al.  Mathematical Study and Numerical Simulation of Multispectral Bioluminescence Tomography , 2006, Int. J. Biomed. Imaging.

[7]  Cristian Lorenz,et al.  Development of a point-based shape representation of arbitrary three-dimensional medical objects suitable for statistical shape modeling , 1999, Medical Imaging.

[8]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Automated image registration: I. General methods and intrasubject, intramodality validation. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[9]  S. Arridge Optical tomography in medical imaging , 1999 .

[10]  C. Pelizzari,et al.  Accurate Three‐Dimensional Registration of CT, PET, and/or MR Images of the Brain , 1989, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[11]  Benoit M. Dawant,et al.  Morphometric analysis of white matter lesions in MR images: method and validation , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[12]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  BrainSuite: An Automated Cortical Surface Identification Tool , 2000, MICCAI.

[13]  Paul M. Thompson,et al.  A Framework for Registration, Statistical Characterization and Classification of Cortically Constrained Functional Imaging Data , 2005, IPMI.

[14]  Shun Xu,et al.  Statistics of populations of images and its embedded objects: driving applications in neuroimaging , 2006, 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Nano to Macro, 2006..

[15]  J C Mazziotta,et al.  Automated image registration: II. Intersubject validation of linear and nonlinear models. , 1998, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[16]  P. Fox,et al.  Surface-based spatial nor-malization using convex hulls , 1999 .

[17]  B. Rice,et al.  In vivo imaging of light-emitting probes. , 2001, Journal of biomedical optics.

[18]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Automated image registration , 1993 .

[19]  Jerry L. Prince,et al.  Image registration based on boundary mapping , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[20]  Jerry L. Prince,et al.  Brain image registration based on curve mapping , 1994, Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Biomedical Image Analysis.

[21]  R. Leahy,et al.  Digimouse: a 3D whole body mouse atlas from CT and cryosection data , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[22]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Diffusion of General Data on Non-Flat Manifolds via Harmonic Maps Theory: The Direction Diffusion Case , 2000, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[23]  E. Hoffman,et al.  In vivo mouse studies with bioluminescence tomography. , 2006, Optics express.

[24]  Colin Studholme,et al.  An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment , 1999, Pattern Recognit..

[25]  西川 青季 Variational problems in geometry , 2002 .

[26]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Landmark matching via large deformation diffeomorphisms , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[27]  Arion F Chatziioannou,et al.  Effect of optical property estimation accuracy on tomographic bioluminescence imaging: simulation of a combined optical–PET (OPET) system , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[28]  Michael I. Miller,et al.  Landmark Matching via Large Deformation Diffeomorphisms on the Sphere , 2004, Journal of Mathematical Imaging and Vision.

[29]  Haiying Liu,et al.  Using Points and Surfaces to Improve Voxel-Based Non-rigid Registration , 2002, MICCAI.

[30]  S. Osher,et al.  Solving variational problems and partial differential equations mapping into general target manifolds , 2004 .