The role of co-activation in strength and force modulation in the elbow of children with unilateral cerebral palsy.

To study the role of coactivation in strength and force modulation in the elbow joint of children and adolescents with cerebral palsy (CP), we investigated the affected and contralateral arm of 21 persons (age 8-18) with spastic unilateral CP in three tasks: maximal voluntary isokinetic concentric contraction and passive isokinetic movement during elbow flexion and extension, and sub-maximal isometric force tracing during elbow flexion. Elbow flexion-extension torque and surface electromyography (EMG) of the biceps brachii (BB) and triceps brachii (TB) muscles were recorded. During the maximal contractions, the affected arm was weaker, had decreased agonist and similar antagonist EMG amplitudes, and thus increased antagonist co-activation (% of maximal activity as agonist) during both elbow flexion and extension, with higher coactivation levels of the TB than the BB. During passive elbow extension, the BB of the affected arm showed increased resistance torque and indication of reflex, and thus spastic, activity. No difference between the two arms was found in the ability to modulate force, despite increased TB coactivation in the affected arm. The results indicate that coactivation plays a minor role in muscle weakness in CP, and does not limit force modulation. Moreover, spasticity seems particularly to increase coactivation in the muscle antagonistic to the spastic one, possibly in order to increase stability.

[1]  M. Abel,et al.  Spasticity versus strength in cerebral palsy: relationships among involuntary resistance, voluntary torque, and motor function , 2001, European journal of neurology.

[2]  J. Caulton,et al.  Systematic Review of Progressive Strength Training in Children and Adolescents with Cerebral Palsy Who Are Ambulatory , 2008, Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association.

[3]  Kristina Tedroff,et al.  Co‐activity during maximum voluntary contraction: a study of four lower‐extremity muscles in children with and without cerebral palsy , 2008, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[4]  Ruud G. J. Meulenbroek,et al.  Deviations in upper-limb function of the less-affected side in congenital hemiparesis , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  K P Granata,et al.  Muscle force production and functional performance in spastic cerebral palsy: relationship of cocontraction. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[6]  R. Barrett,et al.  Gross muscle morphology and structure in spastic cerebral palsy: a systematic review , 2010, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[7]  J. Duysens,et al.  Muscle force generation and force control of finger movements in children with spastic hemiplegia during isometric tasks. , 2005, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[8]  AD Pandyan,et al.  Spasticity: Clinical perceptions, neurological realities and meaningful measurement , 2005, Disability and rehabilitation.

[9]  Ankle torque steadiness is related to muscle activation variability and coactivation in children with cerebral palsy , 2009, Muscle & nerve.

[10]  Richard L Lieber,et al.  Structural and functional changes in spastic skeletal muscle , 2004, Muscle & nerve.

[11]  Richard L Lieber,et al.  Structural and mechanical alterations in spastic skeletal muscle. , 2005, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[12]  V. Dietz,et al.  Cerebral Palsy and Muscle Transformation , 1995, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[13]  J. Skranes,et al.  Cerebral palsy in Norway: prevalence, subtypes and severity. , 2008, European journal of paediatric neurology : EJPN : official journal of the European Paediatric Neurology Society.

[14]  J. McGuire,et al.  Spastic Hypertonia and Movement Disorders: Pathophysiology, Clinical Presentation, and Quantification , 2009, PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation.

[15]  A. Esquenazi,et al.  Common patterns of clinical motor dysfunction , 1997, Muscle & nerve. Supplement.

[16]  James W. Lance,et al.  The control of muscle tone, reflexes, and movement , 1980, Neurology.

[17]  D. Ostry,et al.  Muscle cocontraction following dynamics learning , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[18]  B. Freriks,et al.  Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. , 2000, Journal of electromyography and kinesiology : official journal of the International Society of Electrophysiological Kinesiology.

[19]  Kevin C McGill,et al.  Neuromuscular activation and motor-unit firing characteristics in cerebral palsy. , 2005, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[20]  G. Hansson,et al.  Influence of the subcutaneous fat layer, as measured by ultrasound, skinfold calipers and BMI, on the EMG amplitude , 2003, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[21]  J. Caulton,et al.  The Pathophysiological Basis of Weakness in Children With Cerebral Palsy , 2010, Pediatric physical therapy : the official publication of the Section on Pediatrics of the American Physical Therapy Association.

[22]  Stuart A Binder-Macleod,et al.  Voluntary muscle activation, contractile properties, and fatigability in children with and without cerebral palsy , 2005, Muscle & nerve.

[23]  D. Damiano,et al.  Lower‐Extremity strength profiles in spastic cerebral palsy , 1998, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[24]  La Koman,et al.  Seminar. Cerebral palsy , 2004 .

[25]  Muscle stiffness and strength and their relation to hand function in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. , 2006, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[26]  Paul L Gribble,et al.  Role of cocontraction in arm movement accuracy. , 2003, Journal of neurophysiology.

[27]  J R Engsberg,et al.  Ankle spasticity and strength in children with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy , 2000, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[28]  P. Grimaud [Cerebral palsy]. , 1972, Pediatrie.

[29]  A. Eliasson,et al.  The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) for children with cerebral palsy: scale development and evidence of validity and reliability. , 2006, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[30]  L. Tippett Statistical Tables: For Biological, Agricultural and Medical Research , 1954 .

[31]  S. Fonseca,et al.  Contributions of Cocontraction and Eccentric Activity to Stiffness Regulation , 2009, Journal of motor behavior.

[32]  Jack R Engsberg,et al.  Relationships between spasticity, strength, gait, and the GMFM-66 in persons with spastic diplegia cerebral palsy. , 2007, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[33]  L. Leahey,et al.  Contributing factors to muscle weakness in children with cerebral palsy , 2003, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[34]  B. Vereijken,et al.  Relationship between neuromuscular body functions and upper extremity activity in children with cerebral palsy , 2010, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[35]  Peter J. Beek,et al.  Can co-activation reduce kinematic variability? A simulation study , 2005, Biological Cybernetics.

[36]  K P Granata,et al.  Quantification of cocontraction in spastic cerebral palsy. , 1998, Electromyography and clinical neurophysiology.