Effect of time and space uncertainty on a vigilance task

Two groups, each of 12 Ss, were instructed to detect increments in light level from displays of one or five lights. Signals appeared in regular and in irregular intervals. The display was flashed on simultaneously for 0.8 sec every 3.2 sec. Signal detection was superior with a display of one light than with a display of five lights. For two extreme response criteria, there was a decrement of false alarms and an increment of beta during a run. These changes were not dependent upon time and spatial uncertainty. There were no systematic changes in correct detections and d’ during a run. No difference was found between central and peripheral light positions. Correlation of measures was also examined.

[1]  Michel Loeb,et al.  Variation in performance on auditory and visual monitoring tasks as a function of signal and stimulus frequencies , 1968 .

[2]  W J Gunn,et al.  Correlation of performance in detecting visual and auditory signals. , 1967, The American journal of psychology.

[3]  M Gregory,et al.  Effects of Noise and of Signal Rate upon Vigilance Analysed by Means of Decision Theory , 1965, Human factors.

[4]  G. R. J. Hockey.  Signal Probability and Spatial Location as Possible Bases for Increased Selectivity in Noise , 1970 .

[5]  D. R. Davies,et al.  Human vigilance performance , 1969 .

[6]  D. Broadbent.  Perception and communication , 1958 .

[7]  James P. Egan,et al.  Operating Characteristics, Signal Detectability, and the Method of Free Response , 1961 .

[8]  Earl L. Wiener.  MULTIPLE CHANNEL MONITORING , 1964 .

[9]  J. Deese.  Some problems in the theory of vigilance. , 1955, Psychological review.

[10]  Colquhoun Wp.  The effect of 'unwanted' signals on performance in a vigilance task: a reply to Jerison , 1966 .

[11]  W. C. Howell,et al.  Complex vigilance: relevant and irrelevant signals. , 1969, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  C. H. Baker.  Attention to visual displays during a vigilance task. I. Biasing attention. , 1958, British journal of psychology.

[13]  D. Broadbent,et al.  VIGILANCE CONSIDERED AS A STATISTICAL DECISION. , 1963, British journal of psychology.

[14]  J. A. Adams,et al.  SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL UNCERTAINTY AS DETERMINANTS OF VIGILANCE BEHAVIOR. , 1964, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  W. V. Colquhoun.  THE EFFECT OF ‘UNWANTED’ SIGNALS ON PERFORMANCE IN A VIGILANCE TASK , 1961 .

[16]  J. F. Mackworth,et al.  Vigilance and attention: A signal detection approach , 1970 .

[17]  J. Swets,et al.  A decision-making theory of visual detection. , 1954, Psychological review.

[18]  H J Jerison,et al.  The Elicited Observing Rate and Decision Processes in Vigilance1 , 1965, Human factors.

[19]  J. F. Mackworth.  Vigilance, arousal, and habituation. , 1968, Psychological review.

[20]  W. C. Howell,et al.  Human vigilance as a function of signal frequency and stimulus density. , 1966, Journal of experimental psychology.

[21]  J. L. Hatfield,et al.  Sense mode and coupling in a vigilance task , 1968 .