Adaptation to Spatial Offsets

After prolonged viewing of a three-element target in which the middle element is spatially offset, subsequent viewing of the same three elements in alignment results in the middle element appearing to be offset in the opposite direction. This adaptational aftereffect to a spatial offset was investigated with elements which were spatial-frequency narrowband and equidetectable to ascertain (a) the properties of the mechanisms involved and (b) the nature of the underlying computation. Evidence is presented in favour of an orientational-grouping, rather than a purely positional computation, underlying this aftereffect. A dual site of adaptation is proposed: one which receives input from the orientation extracted from the output of linear filters, and another which receives input from the orientation derived from grouping processes working on the contrast-energy representation. These may correspond to the mechanisms which are thought to underlie the processing of real and subjective contours.

[1]  David J. Field,et al.  Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local “association field” , 1993, Vision Research.

[2]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Subjective contours, tilt aftereffects, and visual cortical organization , 1989, Vision Research.

[3]  D. P. Andrews.  Error-correcting Perceptual Mechanisms , 1964 .

[4]  J. Gibson,et al.  Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of tilted lines. I. Quantitative studies , 1937 .

[5]  D. M. Parker.  Contrast and Size Variables and the Tilt After-effect , 1972, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  J. Gibson,et al.  Adaptation, after-effect and contrast in the perception of curved lines. , 1933 .

[7]  M. Georgeson,et al.  Spatial Frequency Selectivity of a Visual Tilt Illusion , 1973, Nature.

[8]  R. von der Heydt,et al.  Illusory contours and cortical neuron responses. , 1984, Science.

[9]  H. Wallach,et al.  Figural aftereffects; an investigation of visual processes. , 1944 .

[10]  ANDREW SMITH,et al.  Tilt aftereffects with subjective contours , 1975, Nature.

[11]  C F Stromeyer,et al.  Form-Colour Aftereffects: Selectivity to Local Luminance Contrast , 1978, Perception.

[12]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  “Weber's law” for position: the role of spatial frequency and contrast , 1992, Vision Research.

[13]  J. Wolfe.  The Vernier Aftereffect , 1987, Perception.

[14]  K. D. De Valois.  Independence of black and white: phase-specific adaptation. , 1977, Vision research.

[15]  Mark W. Greenlee,et al.  Saturation of the tilt aftereffect , 1987, Vision Research.

[16]  J. Fiser,et al.  Classical geometric illusion effects with nonclassical stimuli: Angular induction from decomposing lines into point arrays , 1994, Perception & psychophysics.

[17]  Robert F. Hess,et al.  The coding of spatial position by the human visual system: Effects of spatial scale and retinal eccentricity , 1994, Vision Research.

[18]  Ian E. Holliday,et al.  The coding of spatial position by the human visual system: Effects of spatial scale and contrast , 1992, Vision Research.

[19]  D. Mitchell,et al.  The spatial selectivity of the tilt aftereffect. , 1974, Vision research.

[20]  Hugh R. Wilson,et al.  Responses of spatial mechanisms can explain hyperacuity , 1986, Vision Research.

[21]  Jeremy M. Wolfe,et al.  Short test flashes produce large tilt aftereffects , 1984, Vision Research.

[22]  K. D. Valois.  Independence of black and white: Phase-specific adaptation , 1977, Vision Research.

[23]  R. Watt,et al.  A theory of the primitive spatial code in human vision , 1985, Vision Research.

[24]  R F Hess,et al.  Metric for separation discrimination by the human visual system. , 1995, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[25]  S Magnussen,et al.  A Test for Contrast-Polarity Selectivity in the Tilt Aftereffect , 1979, Perception.