Evaluation of an intervention to help students avoid unintentional plagiarism by improving their authorial identity

Students with poorly developed authorial identity may be at risk of unintentional plagiarism. An instructional intervention designed specifically to improve authorial identity was delivered to 364 psychology students at three post‐1992 universities in London, UK, and evaluated with before‐and‐after measures of beliefs and attitudes about academic authorship, using the Student Authorship Questionnaire. Changes in questionnaire scores showed that the intervention led to significantly increased confidence in writing, understanding of authorship, knowledge to avoid plagiarism, and top‐down approaches to writing, and significantly decreased bottom‐up and pragmatic approaches to writing. For understanding of authorship, knowledge to avoid plagiarism and pragmatic approaches to writing, significant intervention by year of study interaction effects showed that the greatest improvements were among year one undergraduates. Direct evaluative feedback showed that 86% of students believed the intervention helped them avoid plagiarism and 66% believed it helped them write better assignments. Post‐intervention focus groups revealed changed student understandings about authorial identity and academic writing. The results show that interventions can help students avoid unintentional plagiarism by adopting more authorial roles in their academic writing. Further research could explore other influences on authorial identity, and examine the impact of authorial identity interventions on other outcome indicators.

[1]  E. S. Barry.  Can Paraphrasing Practice Help Students Define Plagiarism , 2006 .

[2]  Stephen E. Newstead,et al.  Undergraduate Cheating: Who Does What and Why?. , 1995 .

[3]  Chris J. Park,et al.  In Other (People's) Words: Plagiarism by university students--literature and lessons , 2003 .

[4]  James Warn,et al.  Plagiarism software: no magic bullet! , 2006 .

[5]  J. Lusher,et al.  Student beliefs and attitudes about authorial identity in academic writing , 2009 .

[6]  P. B. Druen,et al.  Methods for Helping Students Avoid Plagiarism , 2002 .

[7]  Ellen Lavelle,et al.  Development and validation of an inventory to assess processes in college composition , 1993 .

[8]  Donald L. Mccabe,et al.  Academic Dishonesty among Males in College: A Thirty Year Perspective. , 1994 .

[9]  Linda Klebe Trevino,et al.  Cheating in Academic Institutions: A Decade of Research , 2001 .

[10]  Miguel Roig,et al.  Can undergraduate students determine whether text has been plagiarized? , 1997 .

[11]  Barbara Graves,et al.  Discourse appropriation, construction of identities, and the complex issue of plagiarism: ESL students writing in graduate school , 2006 .

[12]  Linda Klebe Trevino,et al.  Honesty and Honor Codes. , 2002 .

[13]  Lin Norton,et al.  A qualitative analysis of staff-student differences in understandings of assessment criteria. , 2006 .

[14]  Pamela Schuetze,et al.  Evaluation of a Brief Homework Assignment Designed to Reduce Citation Problems , 2004 .

[15]  Roger Bennett,et al.  Factors associated with student plagiarism in a post‐1992 university , 2005 .

[16]  Miguel Roig,et al.  When College Students' Attempts at Paraphrasing Become Instances of Potential Plagiarism , 1999 .

[17]  Kathryn Valentine,et al.  Plagiarism as Literacy Practice: Recognizing and Rethinking Ethical Binaries , 2006, College Composition & Communication.

[18]  Velda McCune,et al.  Patterns of response to an approaches to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts , 2000 .

[19]  Fintan Culwin,et al.  An active introduction to academic misconduct and the measured demographics of misconduct , 2006 .

[20]  P. Ashworth,et al.  Guilty in whose eyes? University students' perceptions of cheating and plagiarism in academic work and assessment , 1997 .

[21]  E. Robinson,et al.  Individual differences in undergraduate essay-writing strategies: A longitudinal study , 2000 .