Experiments comparing face-to-face with virtual collaborative learning

We report on set of studies conducted over two years involving over 1000 students at two universities. The main study compares three conditions: conventional classroom lecture, a face-to-face collaborative learning technique called Tutored Video Instruction (TVI), and the virtual-world counterpart of TVI, Distributed Tutored Video Instruction (DTVI). The main study involved over 700 students in 6 courses. When using final course grade as an outcome measure, it has been previously established that TVI students outperform lecture students. Therefore the comparison of interest for us is between DTVI and TVI: would the audio and video technology used to support a distributed group enable DTVI students to achieve the higher grades attainable in TVI? We found no statistical difference between the grades of the DTVI and TVI students, and both groups outperformed the lecture students.We also summarize extensive interaction process data and survey data, then report on some more informal studies assessing the usability and effectiveness of an "Enhanced DTVI" system, in which distributed students can not only see and talk over digital networked media, but can take notes together in real time.

[1]  Herbert L. Colston,et al.  Looking and lingering as conversational cues in video-mediated communication , 1995, CHI 95 Conference Companion.

[2]  Randall B. Smith,et al.  From Kansas to Oz: collaborative debugging when a shared world breaks , 1997, CACM.

[3]  Deborah Monique,et al.  Authors' addresses , 2004 .

[4]  J F Gibbons,et al.  Tutored videotape instruction: a new use of electronics media in education. , 1977, Science.

[5]  Elena Rocco,et al.  Trust breaks down in electronic contexts but can be repaired by some initial face-to-face contact , 1998, CHI.

[6]  Ronald E. Rice,et al.  Evaluating video as a technology for informal communication , 1992, CHI.

[7]  Bernard Horan,et al.  Supporting flexible roles in a shared space , 1998, CSCW '98.

[8]  Steve Whittaker,et al.  Conversations Over Video Conferences: An Evaluation of the Spoken Aspects of Video-Mediated Communication , 1993, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[9]  John C. Tang,et al.  What video can and cannot do for collaboration: A case study , 1993, MULTIMEDIA '93.

[10]  Robert,et al.  The VideoWindow System in Informal Communications , 1990 .

[11]  Andrew F. Monk,et al.  A poor quality video link affects speech but not gaze , 1995, CHI 95 Conference Companion.

[12]  Abigail Sellen,et al.  Speech patterns in video-mediated conversations , 1992, CHI.

[13]  Randall B. Smith,et al.  Virtual Collaborative Learning: A Comparison between Face-to-Face Tutored Video Instruction (TVI) and Distributed Tutored Video Instruction (DTVI) , 1999 .

[14]  Randall B. Smith,et al.  Directness and liveness in the morphic user interface construction environment , 1995, UIST '95.

[15]  Caroline Gale The effects of gaze awareness on dialogue in a video-based collaborative manipulative task , 1998, CHI Conference Summary.

[16]  Robert E. Kraut,et al.  The VideoWindow system in informal communication , 1990, CSCW '90.

[17]  Lee Sproull,et al.  Through a Glass Darkly What Do People Learn in Videoconferences , 1995 .

[18]  E. Cohen Restructuring the Classroom: Conditions for Productive Small Groups , 1994 .