Simulating autonomous coupling in discrimination of light frequencies

To study the interfacial complexity between an agent and its environment such as the adaptive selection aspects of sensory inputs, we propose a new coupling mechanism, called autonomous coupling, where an agent can spontaneously switch on or off its interaction with the environment. An oscillatory neural system with autonomous coupling sums the sensory inputs and initiates action selection via a sensorimotor coupling. An example task we designed to show dynamical categorization is the classification of light frequencies. An evolved agent selects specified light frequencies by approaching them and avoiding light of other frequencies. Dynamical categorization and active coupling are the key concepts for the understanding of situated and embodied cognitive functions.

[1]  T. Ikegami,et al.  Self-maintenance and self-reproduction in an abstract cell model. , 2000, Journal of theoretical biology.

[2]  Randall D. Beer,et al.  The Dynamics of Active Categorical Perception in an Evolved Model Agent , 2003, Adapt. Behav..

[3]  Stefano Nolfi,et al.  Evolving robots able to integrate sensory-motor information over time , 2001, Theory in Biosciences.

[4]  Phil Husbands,et al.  Evolution of Plastic Sensory-motor Coupling and Dynamic Categorization , 2004 .

[5]  T. Odlin Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , 1988 .

[6]  A. Noë,et al.  A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[7]  Stefano Nolfi,et al.  Evolving Robots Able To Integrate Sensory-Motor Information Over Time , 2001 .

[8]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , 1988 .

[9]  F. Varela Principles of biological autonomy , 1979 .

[10]  G. Lakoff Women, fire, and dangerous things : what categories reveal about the mind , 1989 .

[11]  Rolf Pfeifer,et al.  Classification as Sensory-Motor Coordination: A Case Study on Autonomous Agents , 1995, ECAL.

[12]  Phil Husbands,et al.  Self-repairing and Mobility of a Simple Cell Model , 2004 .

[13]  V. Braitenberg Vehicles, Experiments in Synthetic Psychology , 1984 .

[14]  W. Walter A Machine that Learns , 1951 .

[15]  Barry McMullin,et al.  Rediscovering Computational Autopoiesis , 1997 .

[16]  Stefano Nolfi,et al.  Power and the limits of reactive agents , 2002, Neurocomputing.

[17]  J. Nagumo,et al.  On a response characteristic of a mathematical neuron model , 1972, Kybernetik.

[18]  Dario Floreano,et al.  Active vision and feature selection in evolutionary behavioral systems , 2002 .

[19]  Stefano Nolfi,et al.  Learning to perceive the world as articulated: an approach for hierarchical learning in sensory-motor systems , 1998, Neural Networks.

[20]  Takashi Ikegami,et al.  Cellular Evolution in a 3D Lattice Artificial Chemistry , 2003, ECAL.

[21]  J. Gibson Observations on active touch. , 1962, Psychological review.

[22]  Hiroyuki Iizuka,et al.  Adaptability and Diversity in Simulated Turn-taking Behavior , 2003, Artificial Life.

[23]  E. A. Dipaolo,et al.  Homeostatic adaptation to inversion of the visual field and other sensorimotor disruptions , 2000 .

[24]  Stefano Nolfi,et al.  Active perception: a sensorimotor account of object categorization , 2002 .

[25]  Tom Ziemke,et al.  Neuromodulation of Reactive Sensorimotor Mappings as a Short-Term Memory Mechanism in Delayed Response Tasks , 2002, Adapt. Behav..

[26]  Nancy Forbes Imitation of Life , 2004 .