Minimizing deviations of input and output weights from their means in data envelopment analysis

In this paper, we propose a model that minimizes deviations of input and output weights from their means for efficient decision-making units in data envelopment analysis. The mean of an input or output weight is defined as the average of the maximum and the minimum attainable values of the weight when the efficient decision making unit under evaluation remains efficient. Alternate optimal weights usually exist in the linear programming solutions of efficient decision-making units and the optimal weights obtained from most of the linear programming software are somewhat arbitrary. Our proposed model can yield more rational weights without a priori information about the weights. Input and output weights can be used to compute cross-efficiencies of decision-making units in peer evaluations or group decision-making units, which have similar production processes via cluster analysis. If decision makers want to avoid using weights with extreme or zero values to access performance of decision-making units, then choosing weights that are close to their means, may be a rational choice.

[1]  Gholam R. Amin,et al.  Railway station site selection using analytical hierarchy process and data envelopment analysis , 2010, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[2]  Rodney H. Green,et al.  Efficiency and Cross-efficiency in DEA: Derivations, Meanings and Uses , 1994 .

[3]  Gholam R. Amin,et al.  An Assurance Interval for the Non-Archimedean Epsilon in DEA Models , 2000, Oper. Res..

[4]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Selecting non-zero weights to evaluate effectiveness of basketball players with DEA , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  T. Sexton,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: Critique and Extensions , 1986 .

[6]  Emmanuel Thanassoulis,et al.  Weights restrictions and value judgements in Data Envelopment Analysis: Evolution, development and future directions , 1997, Ann. Oper. Res..

[7]  Rodney H. Green,et al.  Cross-Evaluation in DEA - Improving Discrimiation Among DMUs , 1995 .

[8]  Gary R. Reeves,et al.  A multiple criteria approach to data envelopment analysis , 1999, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Kim Fung Lam,et al.  In the determination of weight sets to compute cross-efficiency ratios in DEA , 2010, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[10]  Cheng-Li Chen,et al.  The worst-practice DEA model with slack-based measurement , 2009, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[11]  William W. Cooper,et al.  Choosing weights from alternative optimal solutions of dual multiplier models in DEA , 2007, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[12]  John E. Beasley,et al.  Restricting Weight Flexibility in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1990 .

[13]  P. Andersen,et al.  A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis , 1993 .

[14]  Hasan Bal,et al.  A new method based on the dispersion of weights in data envelopment analysis , 2008, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[15]  Toshiyuki Sueyoshi,et al.  A unified framework for the selection of a Flexible Manufacturing System , 1995 .

[16]  Liang Liang,et al.  DEA game cross-efficiency approach to Olympic rankings , 2009 .

[17]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[18]  Mehdi Toloo,et al.  A polynomial-time algorithm for finding epsilon in DEA models , 2004, Comput. Oper. Res..

[19]  Chris Tofallis,et al.  Input efficiency profiling: An application to airlines , 1997, Comput. Oper. Res..

[20]  Hossein Azizi,et al.  Measurement of overall performances of decision-making units using ideal and anti-ideal decision-making units , 2010, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[21]  Antreas D. Athanassopoulos,et al.  Assessing the relative efficiency of decision making units using DEA models with weight restrictions , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..