Sensitivity analysis based approximation models for day-to-day link flow evolution process

Compared with path-based day-to-day (DTD) traffic evolution models, link-based DTD traffic evolution models are easier to calibrate and validate. However, the inherent network loading sub-problem in link-based DTD models induces high computational burden which precludes their broad practical applicability. To address this challenge, this study proposes three approximation models for the DTD traffic flow evolution process based on the sensitivity analysis of the network loading sub-problem in a link-based DTD model. In particular, a first-order approximation (FOA) model is formulated based on the derivative of link flow solutions with respect to perturbations on network characteristics. To improve the approximation accuracy of the FOA model, a second-order approximation (SOA) model and a variable reduced approximation (VRA) model are developed. The applicability conditions of the proposed approximation models are derived. A small numerical example demonstrates that the FOA model performs well when perturbations are small and the approximation accuracy reduces as the scale of perturbations increases. The SOA and VRA models can improve the approximation accuracy of the FOA model, at the cost of computing the second-order derivative and the reference link flow pattern, respectively.

[1]  L. R. Scott,et al.  Numerical Analysis , 2011 .

[2]  Terry L. Friesz,et al.  A reduction method for local sensitivity analyses of network equilibrium arc flows , 2000 .

[3]  Jiangang Lu,et al.  Steepest Descent Day-to-Day Dynamic Toll , 2007 .

[4]  Martin L. Hazelton,et al.  The Dynamics and Equilibria of Day-to-Day Assignment Models , 2003 .

[5]  Richard Mounce,et al.  A splitting rate model of traffic re-routeing and traffic control , 2011 .

[6]  Terry L. Friesz,et al.  Day-To-Day Dynamic Network Disequilibria and Idealized Traveler Information Systems , 1994, Oper. Res..

[7]  Thomas L. Magnanti,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis for Variational Inequalities Defined on Polyhedral Sets , 1989, Math. Oper. Res..

[8]  D. Watling STABILITY OF THE STOCHASTIC EQUILIBRIUM ASSIGNMENT PROBLEM: A DYNAMICAL SYSTEMS APPROACH , 1999 .

[9]  Giulio Erberto Cantarella,et al.  Dynamic Processes and Equilibrium in Transportation Networks: Towards a Unifying Theory , 1995, Transp. Sci..

[10]  Hai Yang,et al.  A discrete rational adjustment process of link flows in traffic networks , 2013 .

[11]  Anna Nagurney,et al.  Projected Dynamical Systems in the Formulation, Stability Analysis, and Computation of Fixed-Demand Traffic Network Equilibria , 1997, Transp. Sci..

[12]  Henry X. Liu,et al.  Modeling the day-to-day traffic evolution process after an unexpected network disruption , 2012 .

[13]  Michael Patriksson,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Traffic Equilibria , 2004, Transp. Sci..

[14]  Hai Yang,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Network Traffic Equilibrium Revisited: The Corrected Approach , 2007 .

[15]  Xiaolei Guo,et al.  A link-based day-to-day traffic assignment model , 2010 .

[16]  Hong Kam Lo,et al.  Stability and attraction domains of traffic equilibria in a day-to-day dynamical system formulation , 2010 .

[17]  Anna Nagurney,et al.  On the local and global stability of a travel route choice adjustment process , 1996 .

[18]  Satish V. Ukkusuri,et al.  Resilience as an Objective in the Optimal Reconstruction Sequence for Transportation Networks , 2015 .

[19]  Giulio Erberto Cantarella,et al.  Day-to-day Dynamics & Equilibrium Stability in A Two-Mode Transport System with Responsive bus Operator Strategies , 2015 .

[20]  Hai-Jun Huang,et al.  Modeling and solving the dynamic user equilibrium route and departure time choice problem in network with queues , 2002 .

[21]  Terry L. Friesz,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis for Equilibrium Network Flow , 1988, Transp. Sci..

[22]  Giulio Erberto Cantarella,et al.  Model Representation & Decision-Making in an Ever-Changing World: The Role of Stochastic Process Models of Transportation Systems , 2015 .

[23]  Anthony V. Fiacco,et al.  Introduction to Sensitivity and Stability Analysis in Nonlinear Programming , 2012 .

[24]  Hai Yang,et al.  Link-based day-to-day network traffic dynamics and equilibria , 2015 .

[25]  Gary A. Davis,et al.  Large Population Approximations of a General Stochastic Traffic Assignment Model , 1993, Oper. Res..

[26]  M. J. Smith,et al.  A continuous day-to-day traffic assignment model and the existence of a continuous dynamic user equilibrium , 1995, Ann. Oper. Res..

[27]  M. Patriksson,et al.  Sensitivity analysis of separable traffic equilibrium equilibria with application to bilevel optimization in network design , 2007 .

[28]  Michael J. Smith,et al.  The Stability of a Dynamic Model of Traffic Assignment - An Application of a Method of Lyapunov , 1984, Transp. Sci..

[29]  Michael Patriksson,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Aggregated Variational Inequality Problems, with Application to Traffic Equilibria , 2003, Transp. Sci..

[30]  S. Wiggins Introduction to Applied Nonlinear Dynamical Systems and Chaos , 1989 .

[31]  E. Cascetta A stochastic process approach to the analysis of temporal dynamics in transportation networks , 1989 .

[32]  Martin L. Hazelton,et al.  Computation of Equilibrium Distributions of Markov Traffic-Assignment Models , 2004, Transp. Sci..

[33]  Fan Yang,et al.  Day-to-day stationary link flow pattern , 2009 .

[34]  Giulio Erberto Cantarella,et al.  Day-to-day dynamic models for intelligent transportation systems design and appraisal , 2013 .