How open search strategies align with firms’ radical and incremental innovation: evidence from China

The purpose of this paper is to describe the ways in which open search strategies (i.e. open search breadth and open search depth) align with firms’ radical and incremental innovation. By analysing survey data collected from 162 firms in Chinese high-tech markets, we found that a firm pursuing radical innovation benefits more from open search breadth than open search depth to achieve its performance goals; in contrast, a firm processing incremental innovation benefits more from open search depth than open search breadth to improve its performance. Based on these results, managers should pay attention to the fit between open search strategies and radical/incremental innovation. This study not only contributes to the studies of search strategies by identifying the parallel relationship of open search strategies and two types of innovation, but also enriches the theory of open innovation with an empirical analysis.

[1]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  The myopia of learning , 1993 .

[2]  Richard L. Daft,et al.  Organizational information requirements, media richness and structural design , 1986 .

[3]  Sebastian Spaeth,et al.  Extending Private-Collective Innovation: A Case Study , 2009 .

[4]  Robert W. Palmatier.  Interfirm Relational Drivers of Customer Value , 2008 .

[5]  Michael H. Kutner.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1974 .

[6]  J. H. Dyer,et al.  Creating and managing a high‐performance knowledge‐sharing network: the Toyota case , 2000 .

[7]  S. Dopson,et al.  When Does Search Openness Really Matter? A Contingency Study of Health‐Care Innovation Projects , 2013 .

[8]  Mohan Subramaniam,et al.  The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities , 2005 .

[9]  R. Katila.  New Product Search Over Time: Past Ideas in Their Prime? , 2002 .

[10]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. , 2003, The Journal of applied psychology.

[11]  C. Hill,et al.  The Performance of Incumbent firms in the Face of Radical Technological Innovation , 2003 .

[12]  Harbir Singh.  Building firm capabilities through learning: the role of the alliance learning process in alliance capability and firm-level alliance success , 2007 .

[13]  Anupama Phene,et al.  Innovation in multinational subsidiaries: The role of knowledge assimilation and subsidiary capabilities , 2008 .

[14]  U. Lichtenthaler.  Absorptive Capacity, Environmental Turbulence, and the Complementarity of Organizational Learning Processes , 2009 .

[15]  A. Salter,et al.  Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms , 2006 .

[16]  Kevin Zheng Zhou,et al.  How knowledge affects radical innovation: Knowledge base, market knowledge acquisition, and internal knowledge sharing , 2012 .

[17]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[18]  S. Zahra,et al.  Absorptive Capacity: A Review, Reconceptualization, and Extension , 2002 .

[19]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  On the evaluation of structural equation models , 1988 .

[20]  J. Dutton,et al.  The Adoption of Radical and Incremental Innovations: An Empirical Analysis , 1986 .

[21]  B. Kogut,et al.  Capabilities as Real Options , 2001 .

[22]  S. Winter,et al.  An evolutionary theory of economic change , 1983 .

[23]  J. Nunnally.  Psychometric Theory (2nd ed), New York: McGraw-Hill. , 1978 .

[24]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  Thomas Magnusson,et al.  Entering an era of ferment – radical vs incrementalist strategies in automotive power train development , 2011, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[26]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  Towards The Flexible Form: How To Remain Vital in Hypercompetitive Environments , 1996 .

[27]  Constance E. Helfat,et al.  INNOVATION OBJECTIVES, KNOWLEDGE SOURCES, AND THE BENEFITS OF BREADTH , 2010 .

[28]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning , 2007 .

[29]  C. Phelps.  A Longitudinal Study of the Influence of Alliance Network Structure and Composition on Firm Exploratory Innovation , 2009 .

[30]  Giovanni Gavetti,et al.  Capabilities, cognition, and inertia: evidence from digital imaging , 2000 .

[31]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[32]  Wendy K. Smith,et al.  A Structural Approach to Assessing Innovation: Construct Development of Innovation Locus, Type, and Characteristics , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[33]  K. Clark,et al.  Creating project plans to focus product development. , 1992, Harvard business review.

[34]  Morten T. Hansen,et al.  KNOWLEDGE SHARING IN ORGANIZATIONS: MULTIPLE NETWORKS, MULTIPLE PHASES , 2005 .

[35]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[36]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[37]  Martin Gargiulo,et al.  Trapped in Your Own Net? Network Cohesion, Structural Holes, and the Adaptation of Social Capital , 2000 .

[38]  Clayton M. Christensen.  The Ongoing Process of Building a Theory of Disruption , 2006 .

[39]  Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.  Market orientation: Antecedents and consequences , 1993 .

[40]  S. Winter,et al.  An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change.by Richard R. Nelson; Sidney G. Winter , 1987 .

[41]  Marie-Elena Ellis.  Wellspring of knowledge , 2003 .

[42]  Terry S. Overton,et al.  Estimating Nonresponse Bias in Mail Surveys , 1977 .

[43]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[44]  Joseph L. Badaracco,et al.  The knowledge link : how firms compete through strategic alliances / Joseph L. Badaracco, Jr. , 1993 .

[45]  R. Shah,et al.  In union lies strength: Collaborative competence in new product development and its performance effects , 2009 .

[46]  Qing Wang,et al.  Complexity and the functions of the firm : breadth and depth , 2000 .

[47]  V. Barnett,et al.  Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1975 .

[48]  Kuang-Peng Hung,et al.  Exploring Open Search Strategies and Perceived Innovation Performance from the Perspective of Inter-Organizational Knowledge Flows , 2010 .

[49]  R. Katila,et al.  Something Old, Something New: A Longitudinal Study of Search Behavior and New Product Introduction , 2002 .

[50]  S. Morris,et al.  Relational Archetypes, Organizational Learning, and Value Creation: Extending the Human Resource Architecture , 2007 .

[51]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Sources of Innovation , 2016 .

[52]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[53]  K. Atuahene–Gima,et al.  Market Knowledge Dimensions and Cross-Functional Collaboration: Examining the Different Routes to Product Innovation Performance , 2007 .

[54]  P. Bierly,et al.  Generic knowledge strategies in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry , 1996 .

[55]  Beth A. Bechky,et al.  When Collections of Creatives Become Creative Collectives: A Field Study of Problem Solving at Work , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[56]  T. Elfring,et al.  Entrepreneurial Orientation and New Venture Performance: The Moderating Role of Intra- And Extraindustry Social Capital , 2008 .

[57]  Laura B. Cardinal,et al.  The Use of Knowledge for Technological Innovation Within Diversified Firms , 2007 .

[58]  J. Ruiz Moreno.  [Organizational learning]. , 2001, Revista de enfermeria.

[59]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  How firms shape knowledge to explore and exploit: a study of knowledge flows, knowledge stocks and innovative performance across units , 2012, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[60]  Karim R. Lakhani,et al.  Marginality and Problem-Solving Effectiveness in Broadcast Search , 2010, Organ. Sci..

[61]  Sevgin Eroğlu,et al.  Book Review: The Knowledge Link: How Firms Compete through Strategic Alliances , 1993 .

[62]  Donald Tomaskovic-Devey,et al.  Organizational Survey Nonresponse , 1994 .