Why gold is the noblest of all the metals

THE unique role that gold plays in society is to a large extent related to the fact that it is the most noble of all metals: it is the least reactive metal towards atoms or molecules at the interface with a gas or a liquid. The inertness of gold does not reflect a general inability to form chemical bonds, however—gold forms very stable alloys with many other metals. To understand the nobleness of gold, we have studied a simple surface reaction, the dissociation of H2 on the surface of gold and of three other metals (copper, nickel and platinum) that lie close to it in the periodic table. We present self-consistent density-functional calculations of the activation barriers and chemisorption energies which clearly illustrate that nobleness is related to two factors: the degree of filling of the antibonding states on adsorption, and the degree of orbital overlap with the adsorbate. These two factors, which determine both the strength of the adsorbateá¤-metal interaction and the energy barrier for dissociation, operate together to the maxima] detriment of adsorbate binding and subsequent reactivity on gold.

[1]  Auerbach,et al.  State-specific dynamics of D2 desorption from Cu(111): The role of molecular rotational motion in activated adsorption-desorption dynamics. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[2]  J. Nørskov,et al.  Theoretical description of molecule-metal interaction and surface reactions , 1979 .

[3]  A. Hodgson,et al.  Energy transfer and vibrational effects in the dissociation and scattering of D2 from Cu (111) , 1992, Nature.

[4]  Hayden,et al.  Coupled translational-vibrational activation in dissociative hydrogen adsorption on Cu(110). , 1989, Physical review letters.

[5]  C. Rettner,et al.  Effect of rotation on the translational and vibrational energy dependence of the dissociative adsorption of D2 on Cu(111) , 1993 .

[6]  R. Madix,et al.  The reactivity of sulfur-containing molecules on noble metal surfaces: III. Ethanethiol on Au(110) and Ag(110) , 1994 .

[7]  A. Luntz,et al.  Long‐range poisoning of D2 dissociative chemisorption on Pt(111) by coadsorbed K , 1991 .

[8]  C. Kittel.  Introduction to solid state physics , 1954 .

[9]  Surmounting the barriers , 1994, Nature.

[10]  High-dimensional quantum dynamics of adsorption and desorption of H2 at Cu(111). , 1994, Physical review letters.

[11]  Scheffler,et al.  Multidimensional potential energy surface for H2 dissociation over Cu(111). , 1994, Physical review letters.

[12]  Scheffler,et al.  Local Chemical Reactivity of a Metal Alloy Surface. , 1995, Physical review letters.

[13]  A. Winkler,et al.  A SEARCH FOR VIBRATIONAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO THE ACTIVATED ADSORPTION OF H2 ON COPPER , 1990 .

[14]  G. Ertl,et al.  Dynamics of interaction of H2 and D2 with Ni(110) and Ni(110) surfaces , 1985 .

[15]  T. Arias,et al.  Iterative minimization techniques for ab initio total energy calculations: molecular dynamics and co , 1992 .

[16]  J K Norsko,et al.  Chemisorption on metal surfaces , 1990 .

[17]  Jackson,et al.  Atoms, molecules, solids, and surfaces: Applications of the generalized gradient approximation for exchange and correlation. , 1992, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[18]  Jens Kehlet,et al.  Effective medium potentials for molecule–surface interactions: H2 on Cu and Ni surfaces , 1989 .

[19]  White,et al.  Surface corrugation in the dissociative adsorption of H2 on Cu(100). , 1994, Physical review letters.