SummaryThere is an increasing demand from farmers for irrigation scheduling advice. Where rainfall and evapotranspiration vary little from year to year, advice on a fixed irrigation schedule based on mean climatic data can be given. However where significant year to year variability in weather occurs a more flexible approach using actual weather data to predict the current level of soil water and mean climatic data to forecast the future rate of depletion and hence irrigation date may be needed. A technique for deciding the most appropriate scheduling approach was tested by using a simple model of crop growth combined with a soil water balance model to simulate year to year variability in scheduling advice. This technique was applied to irrigated wheat using a set of climatic data from 1968 to 1978 for Griffith in the Murrumbidgee Irrigation Area of New South Wales, Australia. A typical sowing date in early June was used and simulated irrigations were scheduled at an allowable soil water depletion (ASWD) of 62 mm for maximum yield and 93 mm for 80% of maximum. The analysis predicted that weather variability between years would cause the number of irrigations to vary from 2 to 7 for ASWD=62 mm and 1 to 4 for ASWD=93 mm. The interval between irrigations varied from 12 to 30 days, for ASWD=62 mm and from 16 to 28 days, for ASWD=93 mm. The first irrigation occurred between 76 and 131 days from sowing for ASWD=62 mm and from 100 to 140 days from sowing for ASWD=93 mm. The date of the last irrigation was similarly variable. This high degree of variability in the times and frequency of irrigations indicated that in south-eastern Australia accurate irrigation scheduling advice can only be given by using a flexible model using both actual and mean climatic data. A fixed schedule based on mean climatic data would lead to an inefficient use of water caused by the mistiming of irrigations.
[1]
J. Wolfowitz,et al.
An Introduction to the Theory of Statistics
,
1951,
Nature.
[2]
H. L. Penman,et al.
Vegetation and hydrology
,
1963
.
[3]
W. Stern.
Evapotranspiration of Safflower at three densities of sowing
,
1965
.
[4]
Marvin E. Jensen,et al.
Estimating Soil Moisture Depletion from Climate, Crop and Soil Data
,
1971
.
[5]
Joe T. Ritchie,et al.
Model for predicting evaporation from a row crop with incomplete cover
,
1972
.
[6]
C. M. Britton,et al.
Relationships of photosynthetically active radiation and shortwave irradiance
,
1976
.
[7]
P. Biscoe,et al.
Radiation absorption, growth and yield of cereals
,
1978,
The Journal of Agricultural Science.
[8]
S. Idso,et al.
Normalizing the stress-degree-day parameter for environmental variability☆
,
1981
.
[9]
G. Meyer,et al.
Field test of an irrigation scheduling computer model
,
1981
.
[10]
R. G. Smith,et al.
Water balance of three irrigated crops on fine-textured soils of the Riverine Plain
,
1983
.
[11]
E. C. Stegman.
Irrigation Scheduling: Applied Timing Criteria
,
1983
.
[12]
J. Hatfield,et al.
Evapotranspiration Obtained from Remote Sensing Methods
,
1983
.
[13]
Richard C. G. Smith,et al.
Irrigation in Australia: development and prospects
,
1983
.
[14]
R. G. Smith,et al.
Water Use, Foliage Temperature and Yield of Irrigated Wheat in South-eastern Australia
,
1985
.