Open Versus Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Trends of Utilization and Associated Outcomes in England

Objective:To assess the trends in uptake of minimal invasive esophagectomy in England over the last 12 years (1996/1997–2007/2008) and to compare their clinical outcomes with those after open esophagectomy. Summary of Background Data:Around 7400 people are affected each year in the United Kingdom. Prognosis following esophageal resection is, however, poor. Even after “curative” surgery, 5-year survival rates do not exceed 25%. The minimally invasive approach to esophagectomy has attracted attention as a potentially less invasive alternative to conventional surgery. Methods:Data on patients undergoing esophagectomy for esophageal cancer were extracted from a national administrative database. The outcomes of interest were in-hospital mortality, 30-day in-hospital mortality, 30-day total (ie, in and out of hospital) mortality, 365-day total mortality, 28-day emergency readmission rates, and length of hospital stay. Hierarchical logistic regression was used to identify the effect of minimal invasive esophagectomy (MIE) on the outcomes after adjustment for age, gender, socioeconomic deprivation, and comorbidity. Results:A total of 18,673 esophagectomies were performed over the 12-year study period. The use of minimal access surgery increased exponentially over time (from 0.6% in 1996/1997 to 16.0% in 2007/2008). There was a suggestion that patients undergoing MIE had better 1-year survival rates than patients receiving open esophagectomy (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.46–1.01, P = 0.058). Conclusion:The uptake of MIE in England is increasing exponentially. With the possible exception of 1-year survival, patients selected for MIE demonstrated similar mortality and length of stay outcomes when compared with those undergoing conventional surgery. These results need to be confirmed in large-scale randomized controlled trials.

[1]  A. Darzi,et al.  Traditional and Laparoscopic Appendectomy in Adults: Outcomes in English NHS Hospitals Between 1996 and 2006 , 2008, Annals of surgery.

[2]  P. Mcculloch,et al.  Systematic review of minimally invasive resection for gastro‐oesophageal cancer , 2007, The British journal of surgery.

[3]  L. Koniaris,et al.  African American and poor patients have a dramatically worse prognosis for head and neck cancer , 2008, Cancer.

[4]  P. Aylin,et al.  Descriptive study comparing routine hospital administrative data with the Vascular Society of Great Britain and Ireland's National Vascular Database. , 2007, European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery.

[5]  A. Mearns,et al.  Endoscopic oesophagectomy through a right thoracoscopic approach. , 1992, Journal of the Royal College of Surgeons of Edinburgh.

[6]  H. Osugi,et al.  A comparison of video‐assisted thoracoscopic oesophagectomy and radical lymph node dissection for squamous cell cancer of the oesophagus with open operation , 2003, The British journal of surgery.

[7]  I. Braghetto,et al.  Open transthoracic or transhiatal esophagectomy versus minimally invasive esophagectomy in terms of morbidity, mortality and survival , 2006, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[8]  James S. McCaughan,et al.  Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Outcomes in 222 Patients , 2003, Annals of surgery.

[9]  P. Ziprin,et al.  Systematic review of discharge coding accuracy. , 2012, Journal of public health.

[10]  C. Mackenzie,et al.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. , 1987, Journal of chronic diseases.

[11]  L. Neumayer,et al.  Outcomes after esophagectomy: a ten-year prospective cohort. , 2003, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[12]  D. Gotley,et al.  Comparison of the Outcomes Between Open and Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy , 2007, Annals of surgery.

[13]  J. Birkmeyer,et al.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[14]  N. Freemantle,et al.  Variation in activity rates of consultant surgeons and the influence of reward structures in the English NHS , 2004, Journal of health services research & policy.

[15]  S. Law,et al.  Use of minimally invasive oesophagectomy for cancer of the oesophagus. , 2002, The Lancet. Oncology.

[16]  M. Deakin,et al.  Oesophagectomy practice and outcomes in England , 2007, The British journal of surgery.

[17]  J. Tijssen,et al.  Transthoracic Versus Transhiatal Resection for Carcinoma of the Esophagus , 2007 .

[18]  Azeem Majeed,et al.  Use of administrative data or clinical databases as predictors of risk of death in hospital: comparison of models , 2007, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[19]  R. Mannion,et al.  Assessing the performance of NHS hospital trusts: the role of 'hard' and 'soft' information. , 1999, Health policy.

[20]  P. Aylin,et al.  Comparison of administrative data with the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) colorectal cancer database , 2008, International Journal of Colorectal Disease.

[21]  V. Carstairs,et al.  Deprivation: explaining differences in mortality between Scotland and England and Wales. , 1989, BMJ.

[22]  M. Iannettoni,et al.  Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements. , 1999, Annals of surgery.

[23]  C. Buskens,et al.  Hospital volume and hospital mortality for esophagectomy , 2001, Cancer.

[24]  J. Siewert,et al.  Improved Prognosis of Resected Esophageal Cancer , 2004, World Journal of Surgery.

[25]  J. Michaels,et al.  Use of mortality rate after aortic surgery as a performance indicator , 2003, The British journal of surgery.