Neuroplasticity as a Double-edged Sword: Deaf Enhancements and Dyslexic Deficits in Motion Processing

We examined the hypothesis that aspects of processing that are most modifiable by experience (i.e., plastic) display the most vulnerability in developmental disorders and the most compensatory enhancement after sensory deprivation. A large literature reports that motion processing and magnocellular visual function is selectively deficient in dyslexia. A smaller literature reports enhancements in such functions in deaf individuals. However, studies with dyslexic and deaf individuals have used different experimental paradigms to assess visual function, and no research has yet examined both sides of modifiability (i.e., enhancements and deficits) using the same experimental paradigm. In the present research, visual function was compared in dyslexic (n = 15), deaf (n = 17), and control adults by using automated peripheral kinetic and foveal static perimetry. In the kinetic perimetry task, the dyslexic group showed deficits ( p < .003), whereas the deaf group showed enhancements ( p < .001) for detecting moving light points in the periphery. In the foveal static perimetry task, neither the dyslexic ( p = .866) nor the deaf ( p = .632) group differed significantly from controls in foveal contrast sensitivity thresholds, and no group or individual approached ceiling performance on this task. Taken together, the present data bridge previous literatures and suggest that motion processing tasks are selectively modifiable, either to decrement or enhancement, whereas foveal contrast sensitivity does not differ in dyslexic or deaf groups.

[1]  Margarete Delazer,et al.  Sex differences in cognitive functions , 2003 .

[2]  G. Alexander,et al.  Sex differences in response to children's toys in nonhuman primates (Cercopithecus aethiops sabaeus) , 2002 .

[3]  Matthew W. G. Dye,et al.  Visual Skills and Cross‐Modal Plasticity in Deaf Readers , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[4]  Matthew W. G. Dye,et al.  Which aspects of visual attention are changed by deafness? The case of the Attentional Network Test , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[5]  WH Merigan,et al.  Chromatic and achromatic vision of macaques: role of the P pathway , 1989, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[6]  Helen J. Neville,et al.  Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: an event-related potential and behavioral study. II. Congenitally deaf adults , 1987, Brain Research.

[7]  D. Hubel,et al.  Segregation of form, color, movement, and depth: anatomy, physiology, and perception. , 1988, Science.

[8]  T. Stuve,et al.  Motion perception and aging. , 1992, Psychology and aging.

[9]  D. Bavelier,et al.  Changes in the Spatial Distribution of Visual Attention after Early Deafness , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[10]  J. Atkinson,et al.  Normal and anomalous development of visual motion processing: motion coherence and ‘dorsal-stream vulnerability’ , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[11]  T. Horvath,et al.  Sexual dimorphism and aromatase in the rat retina. , 2001, Brain research. Developmental brain research.

[12]  F. Martin,et al.  A theoretical and experimental case for a visual deficit in specific reading disability , 1986 .

[13]  D. Millslagle Coincidence Anticipation and Dynamic Visual Acuity in Young Adolescents , 2004, Perceptual and motor skills.

[14]  H N Reynolds Effects of foveal stimulation on peripheral visual processing and laterality in deaf and hearing subjects. , 1993, The American journal of psychology.

[15]  D. Bavelier,et al.  Cross-modal plasticity: where and how? , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[16]  D. V. van Essen,et al.  Antibody labeling of functional subdivisions in visual cortex: Cat-301 immunoreactivity in striate and extrastriate cortex of the macaque monkey , 1990, Visual Neuroscience.

[17]  C. S. Green,et al.  Action video game modifies visual selective attention , 2003, Nature.

[18]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Mechanisms of cognitive development : behavioral and neural perspectives , 2001 .

[19]  Helen J. Neville,et al.  Asynchronies in the Development of Electrophysiological Responses to Motion and Color , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  Marta Kutas,et al.  Altered visual-evoked potentials in congenitally deaf adults , 1983, Brain Research.

[21]  Matthew W. G. Dye,et al.  Do deaf individuals see better? , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  C. S. Green,et al.  Deafness and visual enumeration: Not all aspects of attention are modified by deafness , 2007, Brain Research.

[23]  O. Arisaka,et al.  Sex Differences in Children's Free Drawings: A Study on Girls with Congenital Adrenal Hyperplasia , 2001, Hormones and Behavior.

[24]  Reynolds Hn,et al.  Effects of foveal stimulation on peripheral visual processing and laterality in deaf and hearing subjects. , 1993 .

[25]  J. Mattingley,et al.  Annual meeting of the Cognitive Neuroscience Society , 1997 .

[26]  Helen J. Neville,et al.  Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task: an event-related potential and behavioral study. I. Normal hearing adults , 1987, Brain Research.

[27]  J. Stein,et al.  Visual motion sensitivity in dyslexia: evidence for temporal and energy integration deficits , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  J. Atkinson Early visual development: Differential functioning of parvocellular and magnocellular pathways , 1992, Eye.

[29]  Kevin J. Riggs,et al.  Motion processing in autism: evidence for a dorsal stream deficiency , 2000, Neuroreport.

[30]  H. Renvall,et al.  Left minineglect in dyslexic adults. , 2001, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[31]  M Corbetta,et al.  Attentional modulation of neural processing of shape, color, and velocity in humans. , 1990, Science.

[32]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A direct demonstration of functional specialization in human visual cortex , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[33]  A. Rees,et al.  Sensitivity to dynamic auditory and visual stimuli predicts nonword reading ability in both dyslexic and normal readers , 1998, Current Biology.

[34]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Selective magnocellular deficits in dyslexia: a “phantom contour” study , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  C. Hutton,et al.  Visual Attention to the Periphery Is Enhanced in Congenitally Deaf Individuals , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  John F. Stein,et al.  Impaired neuronal timing in developmental dyslexia—the magnocellular hypothesis , 1999 .

[37]  David J Heeger,et al.  Psychophysical evidence for a magnocellular pathway deficit in dyslexia , 1998, Vision Research.

[38]  M. Molteni,et al.  The gradient of visual attention in developmental dyslexia , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  D. Bavelier,et al.  Effects of auditory and visual deprivation on human brain development , 2001, Clinical Neuroscience Research.

[40]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  Sex differences in human neonatal social perception , 2000 .

[41]  Jan M. Ruijter,et al.  Visual half-field development in children: detection of motion-defined forms , 1998, Vision Research.

[42]  J. Juraska Sex differences in “cognitive” regions of the rat brain , 1991, Psychoneuroendocrinology.

[43]  Paul B Hibbard,et al.  Visual Processing and Dyslexia , 1999, Perception.

[44]  D. Proffitt,et al.  Judgments of natural and anomalous trajectories in the presence and absence of motion. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[45]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[46]  F. Previc Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: Its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications , 1990, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[47]  Ellen Winner,et al.  Dyslexia and Visual-Spatial Talents: Compensation vs Deficit Model , 2001, Brain and Language.

[48]  A. Galaburda,et al.  Evidence for aberrant auditory anatomy in developmental dyslexia. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[49]  G. Mangun,et al.  Developmental dyslexia: Passive visual stimulation provides no evidence for a magnocellular processing defect , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[50]  H. Neville,et al.  Attention to central and peripheral visual space in a movement detection task. III. Separate effects of auditory deprivation and acquisition of a visual language , 1987, Brain Research.

[51]  Craig J. Brozinsky,et al.  Impact of Early Deafness and Early Exposure to Sign Language on the Cerebral Organization for Motion Processing , 2001, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[52]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Functions of the colour-opponent and broad-band channels of the visual system , 1990, Nature.

[53]  Geoffrey W Stuart,et al.  Can contrast sensitivity functions in dyslexia be explained by inattention rather than a magnocellular deficit? , 2001, Vision Research.

[54]  J. Stein,et al.  Contrast sensitivity and coherent motion detection measured at photopic luminance levels in dyslexics and controls , 1995, Vision Research.

[55]  H TSCHABOLD,et al.  [The deaf school child]. , 1952, Pro Infirmis.

[56]  M. Turatto,et al.  Asymmetrical visual fields distribution of attention in dyslexic children: a neuropsychological study , 2000, Neuroscience Letters.

[57]  Size of the Visual Field in Collegiate Fast-Pitch Softball Players and Nonathletes , 1995, Perceptual and motor skills.

[58]  Karen R. Dobkins,et al.  Visual Field Asymmetries for Motion Processing in Deaf and Hearing Signers , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[59]  J F Stein,et al.  Are dyslexics’ visual deficits limited to measures of dorsal stream function? , 2001, Neuroreport.

[60]  D. C. Van Essen,et al.  Concurrent processing streams in monkey visual cortex , 1988, Trends in Neurosciences.

[61]  Lisa D. Sanders,et al.  Neurophysiological evidence for selective auditory attention deficits in children with specific language impairment , 2006, Brain Research.

[62]  A. B. Hollingshead,et al.  Four factor index of social status , 1975 .

[63]  M Bross,et al.  Residual Sensory Capacities of the Deaf: A Signal Detection Analysis of a Visual Discrimination Task , 1979, Perceptual and motor skills.

[64]  R. Wolfinger,et al.  Comparing the SAS® GLM and MIXED Procedures for Repeated Measures , 1996 .

[65]  G. Alexander An Evolutionary Perspective of Sex-Typed Toy Preferences: Pink, Blue, and the Brain , 2003, Archives of sexual behavior.

[66]  C Gössl,et al.  Frequency dependence and gender effects in visual cortical regions involved in temporal frequency dependent pattern processing , 2001, Human brain mapping.

[67]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Organization of visual inputs to the inferior temporal and posterior parietal cortex in macaques , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[68]  Bogdan Dreher,et al.  High Precision Systems Require High Precision Blueprints: A New View Regarding the Formation of Connections in the Mammalian Visual System , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[69]  E. Callaway,et al.  Functional Streams and Local Connections of Layer 4C Neurons in Primary Visual Cortex of the Macaque Monkey , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[70]  R. Woods,et al.  Abnormal processing of visual motion in dyslexia revealed by functional brain imaging , 1996, Nature.

[71]  Bruce D. McCandliss,et al.  Testing the Efficiency and Independence of Attentional Networks , 2002, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[72]  E. Callaway,et al.  Convergence of magno- and parvocellular pathways in layer 4B of macaque primary visual cortex , 1996, Nature.

[73]  Karen R. Dobkins,et al.  The Effects of Spatial Attention on Motion Processing in Deaf Signers, Hearing Signers, and Hearing Nonsigners , 2002, Brain and Cognition.

[74]  Steven A Hillyard,et al.  Auditory deprivation affects processing of motion, but not color. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[75]  Mairéad MacSweeney,et al.  Predictors of reading delay in deaf adolescents: the relative contributions of rapid automatized naming speed and phonological awareness and decoding. , 2003, Journal of deaf studies and deaf education.

[76]  J. Maunsell,et al.  Macaque vision after magnocellular lateral geniculate lesions , 1990, Visual Neuroscience.

[77]  P. Schiller,et al.  Functional specificity of lateral geniculate nucleus laminae of the rhesus monkey. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[78]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  How parallel are the primate visual pathways? , 1993, Annual review of neuroscience.

[79]  M. Livingstone,et al.  Physiological and anatomical evidence for a magnocellular defect in developmental dyslexia. , 1991, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[80]  John Harris,et al.  Handbook of mathematics and computational science , 1998 .

[81]  Vincent J. Samar,et al.  Non-verbal IQ is correlated with visual field advantages for short duration coherent motion detection in deaf signers with varied ASL exposure and etiologies of deafness , 2007, Brain and Cognition.

[82]  V. Samar,et al.  Cortical locus of coherent motion deficits in deaf poor readers , 2007, Brain and Cognition.

[83]  Donna Coch,et al.  Motion and color processing in school-age children and adults: an ERP study. , 2005, Developmental science.

[84]  Marjorie A.M. Hollants-Gilhuijs,et al.  Visual half-field development in children: Detection of colour-contrast-defined forms , 1998, Vision Research.

[85]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  ‘What’ and ‘where’ in the human brain , 1994, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.