Are respondents more likely to list alters with certain characteristics?: Implications for name generator data

Abstract Analyses of egocentric networks make the implicit assumption that the list of alters elicited by name generators is a complete list or representative sample of relevant alters. Based on the literature on free recall tasks and the organization of people in memory, I hypothesize that respondents presented with a name generator are more likely to name alters with whom they share stronger ties, alters who are more connected within the network, and alters with whom they interact in more settings. I conduct a survey that presents respondents with the GSS name generator and then prompts them to remember other relevant alters whom they have not yet listed. By comparing the alters elicited before and after prompts I find support for the first two hypotheses. I then go on to compare network-level measures calculated with the alters elicited by the name generator to the same measures calculated with data from all alters. These measures are not well correlated. Furthermore, the degree of underestimation of network size is related to the networks’ mean closeness, density, and mean duration of relationships. Higher values on these variables result in more accurate estimation of network size. This suggests that measures of egocentric network properties based on data collected using a single name generator may have high levels of measurement error, possibly resulting in misestimation of how these network properties relate to other variables.

[1]  B. Wellman The Community Question: The Intimate Networks of East Yorkers , 1979, American Journal of Sociology.

[2]  Devon D. Brewer,et al.  Forgetting of friends and its effects on measuring friendship networks , 2000, Soc. Networks.

[3]  Mark S. Granovetter The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[4]  P. Killworth,et al.  Informant accuracy in social network data III: A comparison of triadic structure in behavioral and cognitive data , 1979 .

[5]  K. Campbell,et al.  Name generators in surveys of personal networks , 1991 .

[6]  P. Killworth,et al.  Informant Accuracy in Social Network Data , 1976 .

[7]  A. Kimball Romney,et al.  Predicting informant accuracy from patterns of recall among individuals , 1984 .

[8]  Constantine Sedikides,et al.  The recapitulation hypothesis in person retrieval , 1988 .

[9]  R. Chambers,et al.  Family and social network , 1964 .

[10]  Ronald S. Burt,et al.  Network items and the general social survey , 1984 .

[11]  P. Killworth,et al.  The Problem of Informant Accuracy: The Validity of Retrospective Data , 1984 .

[12]  L. Freeman,et al.  Cognitive Structure and Informant Accuracy , 1987 .

[13]  Peter V. Marsden,et al.  The reliability of network density and composition measures , 1993 .

[14]  P. Killworth,et al.  INFORMANT ACCURACY IN SOCIAL NETWORK DATA II , 1977 .

[15]  S. Feld The Focused Organization of Social Ties , 1981, American Journal of Sociology.

[16]  Devon D. Brewer,et al.  Patterns in the recall of persons in a student community , 1993 .

[17]  D. Brewer,et al.  Forgetting as a cause of incomplete reporting of sexual and drug injection partners. , 1999, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[18]  M. Hammer,et al.  Explorations into the meaning of social network interview data , 1984 .

[19]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  NETWORK DATA AND MEASUREMENT , 1990 .

[20]  C. Fischer To Dwell Among Friends , 1982 .

[21]  M. Kochen,et al.  Contacts and influence , 1978 .

[22]  Claude S. Fischer,et al.  A Procedure for Surveying Personal Networks , 1978 .

[23]  Devon D. Brewer,et al.  Forgetting in the recall-based elicitation of personal and social networks , 2000, Soc. Networks.

[24]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  Do You Know Whom You Were with a Week Ago Friday? A Re-Analysis of the Bernard, Killworth, and Sailer Studies , 1990 .

[25]  P. Killworth,et al.  Informant accuracy in social network data IV: a comparison of clique-level structure in behavioral and cognitive network data , 1979 .

[26]  E. Laumann Prestige And Association In An Urban Community , 1966 .

[27]  Roel Bosker,et al.  Multilevel analysis : an introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling , 1999 .

[28]  R. Burt,et al.  Applied Network Analysis: A Methodological Introduction , 1983 .

[29]  Peter V. Marsden,et al.  Interpretation and interview context: examining the General Social Survey name generator using cognitive methods , 1999, Soc. Networks.

[30]  P. V. Marsden,et al.  Core Discussion Networks of Americans , 1987 .

[31]  P. Killworth,et al.  Informant accuracy in social-network data V. An experimental attempt to predict actual communication from recall data☆ , 1982 .

[32]  Devon D. Brewer,et al.  Patterns in the recall of persons in a religious community , 1994 .