Optimal Windows for Aggregating Ratings in Electronic Marketplaces

Aseller in an online marketplace with an effective reputation mechanism should expect that dishonest behavior results in higher payments now whereas honest behavior results in a better reputation---and thus higher payments---in the future. We study the Window Aggregation Mechanism, a widely used class of mechanisms that shows the average value of the seller's ratings within some fixed window of past transactions. We suggest approaches for choosing the window size that maximizes the range of parameters for which it is optimal for the seller to be truthful. We show that mechanisms that use information from a larger number of past transactions tend to provide incentives for patient sellers to be more truthful but for higher-quality sellers to be less truthful.

[1]  Paul Chwelos,et al.  Differences in “Truthiness” across Online Reputation Mechanisms , 2007 .

[2]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas,et al.  The Sound of Silence in Online Feedback: Estimating Trading Risks in the Presence of Reporting Bias , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[3]  David H. Reiley,et al.  Pennies from Ebay: The Determinants of Price in Online Auctions , 2000 .

[4]  Arun Sundararajan,et al.  Reputation premiums in electronic peer-to-peer markets: analyzing textual feedback and network structure , 2005, P2PECON '05.

[5]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Monotone Comparative Statics , 1994 .

[6]  D. M. Topkis Supermodularity and Complementarity , 1998 .

[7]  Gary E. Bolton,et al.  Engineering Trust - Reciprocity in the Production of Reputation Information , 2009 .

[8]  Christina Aperjis,et al.  Designing Reputation Mechanisms for Efficient Trade , 2010 .

[9]  Yong Tan,et al.  Evaluation and design of online cooperative feedback mechanisms for reputation management , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[10]  Chrysanthos Dellarocas,et al.  Reputation Mechanism Design in Online Trading Environments with Pure Moral Hazard , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[11]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[12]  Lingfang Li Reputation, Trust, and Rebates: How Online Auction Markets Can Improve Their Feedback Mechanisms , 2009 .

[13]  Paul Resnick,et al.  The value of reputation on eBay: A controlled experiment , 2002 .

[14]  M. Cripps,et al.  Imperfect Monitoring and Impermanent Reputations , 2002 .