Optimum Magnetic Circuit Configurations for Permanent Magnet Aerospace Generators

In the design of high-speed low-power electrical generators for unmanned aircraft and spacecraft, maximization of specific output (power/weight) is of prime importance. Several magnetic circuit configurations (radial-field, axial-field, flux-squeezing, homopolar) have been proposed, and in this paper the relative merits of these configurations are subjected to a quantitative investigation over the speed range 10 000-100 000 rev/min and power range 250 W-10 kW. The advantages of incorporating new high energy-density magnetic materials are described. Part 1 deals with establishing an equivalent circuit for permanent-magnet generators. For each configuration the equivalent circuit parameters are related to the physical dimensions of the generator components and an optimization procedure produces a minimum volume design at discrete output powers and operating speeds. The technique is illustrated by a quantitative comparison of the specific outputs of conventional radial-field generators with samarium cobalt and alnico magnets. In Part II the specific outputs of conventional, flux-squeezing, and claw-rotor magnetic circuit configurations are compared. The flux-squeezing configuration is shown to produce the highest specifilc output for small sizes whereas the conventional configuration is best at large sizes. For all sizes the claw-rotor configuration is significantly inferior. In Part I1l the power densities available from axial-field and flux-switching magnetic circuit configurations are maximized, over the power range 0.25-10 kW and speed range 10 000-100 000 rpm, and compared to the results of Parts I & II. For the axial-field configuration the power density is always less than that of the conventional and flux-squeezing radial-field configurations.

[1]  V. Honsinger The Fields and Parameters of Interior Type AC Permanent Magnet Machines , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[2]  G. Hoffer,et al.  A Family of New Cobalt‐Base Permanent Magnet Materials , 1967 .

[3]  Wai Leung,et al.  A New Design Approach for Axial-Field Electrical Machines , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Power Apparatus and Systems.

[4]  Nabeel A. O. Demerdash,et al.  Permanent magnet modeling for use in vector potential finite element field analysis in electrical machinery , 1981 .

[5]  G. C. Jain Design Aspects of a Homopolar Inductor-Alternator , 1964 .

[6]  P. D. Evans,et al.  Novel disc-motor designs , 1978 .

[7]  E. J. Davies,et al.  Magnetic permeance of identical double slotting , 1972 .

[8]  Nady Boules,et al.  FIELD ANALYSIS FOR A HIGH-POWER, HIGH-SPEED PERMANENT MAGNET SYNCHRONOUS MACHINE OF THE DISC CONSTRUCTION TYPE , 1980 .

[9]  S. Evershed,et al.  Permanent magnets in theory and practice , 1920 .

[10]  D. J. Hanrahan,et al.  Permanent-Magnet Generators , 1963 .

[11]  Gaj Amaratunga Comparison of magnetic circuit configurations for small aerospace generators , 1982 .

[12]  R. M. Saunders,et al.  Design of permanent-magnet alternators , 1951, Electrical Engineering.

[13]  A. L. Jokl,et al.  High-Speed Homopolar Inductor Alternators of Minimum Leakage Reactance , 1970, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[14]  K. J. Binns,et al.  Permanent-magnet a.c. generators , 1979 .

[15]  K. C. Mukherji,et al.  Magnetic permeance of identical double slotting. Deductions from analysis by F.W. Carter , 1971 .

[16]  J. H. Walker High-Frequency alternators , 1946 .