False discovery rate for functional data

Since Benjamini and Hochberg introduced false discovery rate (FDR) in their seminal paper, this has become a very popular approach to the multiple comparisons problem. An increasingly popular topic within functional data analysis is local inference, i.e. the continuous statistical testing of a null hypothesis along the domain. The principal issue in this topic is the infinite amount of tested hypotheses, which can be seen as an extreme case of the multiple comparisons problem. In this paper, we define and discuss the notion of FDR in a very general functional data setting. Moreover, a continuous version of the Benjamini–Hochberg procedure is introduced along with a definition of adjusted p value function. Some general conditions are stated, under which the functional Benjamini–Hochberg procedure provides control of the functional FDR. Two different simulation studies are presented; the first study has a one-dimensional domain and a comparison with another state-of-the-art method, and the second study has a planar two-dimensional domain. Finally, the proposed method is applied to satellite measurements of Earth temperature. In detail, we aim at identifying the regions of the planet where temperature has significantly increased in the last decades. After adjustment, large areas are still significant.

[1]  Piotr Kokoszka,et al.  Inference for Functional Data with Applications , 2012 .

[2]  P. Heesen,et al.  Inequalities for the false discovery rate (FDR) under dependence , 2014, 1410.8290.

[3]  David A. Freedman,et al.  A Nonstochastic Interpretation of Reported Significance Levels , 1983 .

[4]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Multiple Hypotheses Testing with Weights , 1997 .

[5]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing , 1995 .

[6]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  THE CONTROL OF THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE IN MULTIPLE TESTING UNDER DEPENDENCY , 2001 .

[7]  B. Silverman,et al.  Functional Data Analysis , 1997 .

[8]  Alessia Pini,et al.  Nonparametric inference for functional-on-scalar linear models applied to knee kinematic hop data after injury of the anterior cruciate ligament , 2018 .

[9]  John D. Storey The positive false discovery rate: a Bayesian interpretation and the q-value , 2003 .

[10]  John D. Storey,et al.  Empirical Bayes Analysis of a Microarray Experiment , 2001 .

[11]  A. Berlinet,et al.  Reproducing kernel Hilbert spaces in probability and statistics , 2004 .

[12]  Hans-Georg Müller,et al.  Functional Data Analysis , 2016 .

[13]  Wenguang Sun,et al.  False discovery control in large‐scale spatial multiple testing , 2015, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B, Statistical methodology.

[14]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Permutation inference for the general linear model , 2014, NeuroImage.

[15]  Dan Cheng,et al.  MULTIPLE TESTING OF LOCAL MAXIMA FOR DETECTION OF PEAKS IN RANDOM FIELDS. , 2014, Annals of statistics.

[16]  Armin Schwartzman,et al.  MULTIPLE TESTING OF LOCAL MAXIMA FOR DETECTION OF PEAKS IN 1D. , 2011, Annals of statistics.

[17]  Alessia Pini,et al.  Interval-wise testing for functional data , 2017 .

[18]  J D Watson,et al.  Nonparametric Analysis of Statistic Images from Functional Mapping Experiments , 1996, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.