Testimonials Versus Informational Persuasive Messages

This study aims to test the relative effectiveness of testimonials compared to simple informational health messages, presented both through different modalities and to recipients with different levels of involvement. Results of the three independent experiments demonstrate that testimonials are more persuasive when presented through the audio mode rather than when presented through the written mode. Also, the informational messages are more persuasive when perceived by individuals characterized by high rather than low involvement and high rather than low need for cognition. The results are explained in terms of the Elaboration Likelihood Model. The interactive effect of transportation and involvement on persuasion is further examined. The findings help in the development of more efficient message targeting. The highest level of efficiency can be achieved if the appropriate media modality and message format are used for recipients with certain initial involvement or need for cognition.

[1]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Personal involvement as a determinant of argument based persuasion , 1981 .

[2]  Sally Jackson,et al.  GENERALIZING ABOUT MESSAGES: SUGGESTIONS FOR DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF EXPERIMENTS , 1983 .

[3]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Comprehensibility of persuasive arguments as a determinant of opinion change. , 1974 .

[4]  Richard E. Petty,et al.  Multiple Roles for Affect in Persuasion , 1991 .

[5]  Hans-Bernd Brosius,et al.  The Utility of Exemplars in Persuasive Communications , 1994 .

[6]  Reeshad S. Dalal,et al.  Validity of Web-Based Psychological Research , 2000 .

[7]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  Attitudes and cognitive response: An electrophysiological approach. , 1979 .

[8]  Gary L. Kreps,et al.  Communication interventions and cancer control: a review of the National Cancer Institute's health communication intervention research initiative. , 2001, Family & community health.

[9]  Lauren G. Block,et al.  Effects of Self-Efficacy and Vividness on the Persuasiveness of Health Communications , 1997 .

[10]  J. Forgas Handbook of Affect and Social Cognition , 2001 .

[11]  P. K. Murphy,et al.  Persuasion online or on paper: a new take on an old issue , 2003 .

[12]  S. Chaiken Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. , 1980 .

[13]  Joohn C. Reinard The Empirical Study of the Persuasive Effects of Evidence The Status After Fifty Years of Research , 1988 .

[14]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Stalking the elusive "vividness" effect. , 1982 .

[15]  Suzanne M. Miller,et al.  Telephone counseling improves adherence to colposcopy among lower-income minority women. , 1992, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  P. Salovey,et al.  The wisdom in feeling: psychological processes in emotional intelligence , 2002 .

[17]  K. Scherer,et al.  Handbook of affective sciences. , 2003 .

[18]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Effects of need for cognition on message evaluation, recall, and persuasion. , 1983 .

[19]  Matthias Burisch,et al.  Approaches to personality inventory construction: A comparison of merits. , 1984 .

[20]  P. Corso,et al.  The effectiveness of interventions to increase physical activity. A systematic review. , 2002, American journal of preventive medicine.

[21]  C. F. Kao,et al.  Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: An individual difference perspective. , 1986 .

[22]  Russell T. Church,et al.  Values and Policies in Controversy: An Introduction to Argumentation and Debate , 1986 .

[23]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. , 1979 .

[24]  James M. Olson,et al.  Uncertainty orientation and persuasion: Individual differences in the effects of personal relevance on social judgments. , 1988 .

[25]  C. F. Kao,et al.  The efficient assessment of need for cognition. , 1984, Journal of personality assessment.

[26]  Stephen Worchel,et al.  Is the Medium the Message? A Study of the Effects of Media, Communicator, and Message Characteristics on Attitude Change1 , 1975 .

[27]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  The Influence of Motor Processes on Attitudes Toward Novel Versus Familiar Semantic Stimuli , 1996 .

[28]  S. Shea,et al.  Reproducibility of the women's module of the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System questionnaire. , 1996, Annals of epidemiology.

[29]  R. Chris Fraley How to conduct behavioral research over the Internet , 1992 .

[30]  J. R. Knapp,et al.  On Attitude Change: Issue-Involvement and Demand Characteristics , 1984 .

[31]  J. J. Strange,et al.  How Anecdotal Accounts in News and in Fiction Can Influence Judgments of a Social Problem’s Urgency, Causes, and Cures , 1999 .

[32]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Communication modality as a determinant of persuasion: The role of communicator salience. , 1983 .

[33]  Percy H. Tannenbaum,et al.  Effect of Newscast item Leads upon Listener Interpretation , 1954 .

[34]  Jerry L. Grenard,et al.  Translation as a Function of Modality , 2006, Evaluation & the health professions.

[35]  A. Babrow,et al.  Effects of Narrative and Paradigmatic Judgmental Orientations on the Use of Qualitative and Quantitative Evidence in Health-Related Inference , 2005 .

[36]  W. Kroeze,et al.  A systematic review of randomized trials on the effectiveness of computer-tailored education on physical activity and dietary behaviors , 2006, Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine.

[37]  Melanie C. Green,et al.  In the Mind's Eye Transportation-Imagery Model of Narrative Persuasion , 2002 .

[38]  M. Slater,et al.  Value-Affirmative and Value-Protective Processing of Alcohol Education Messages That Include Statistical Evidence or Anecdotes , 1996 .

[39]  Franklin H. Knower,et al.  Experimental Studies of Changes in Attitudes: I. A Study of the Effect of Oral Argument on Changes of Attitude , 1935 .

[40]  Peter R. Dickson,et al.  The Impact of Enriching Case and Statistical Information on Consumer Judgments , 1982 .

[41]  E. McGinnies,et al.  A CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON OF PRINTED COMMUNICATION VERSUS SPOKEN COMMUNICATION IN PERSUASION. , 1965, The Journal of psychology.

[42]  Blair T. Johnson,et al.  Effects of involvement on persuasion: a meta-analysis , 1989 .

[43]  Carol J. Williams,et al.  The Role of Attitude Accessibility in the Attitude-to-Behavior Process , 1989 .

[44]  Curtis P. Haugtvedt,et al.  Need for Cognition and Advertising: Understanding the Role of Personality Variables in Consumer Behavior , 1992 .

[45]  Joseph P. Forgas,et al.  Emotion and Social Judgments , 2020 .

[46]  Matthias Burisch,et al.  Approaches to Personality Inventory Construction , 1984 .

[47]  Dolf Zillmann Exemplification in communication , 2000 .

[48]  Blair T. Johnson Effects of Outcome-Relevant Involvement and Prior Information on Persuasion , 1994 .

[49]  B. Rimer,et al.  Is there a use for tailored print communications in cancer risk communication? , 1999, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[50]  J. Prochaska,et al.  In Search of How People Change: Applications to Addictive Behaviors , 1992, The American psychologist.

[51]  L. Ross,et al.  Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. , 1981 .

[52]  Leandre R. Fabrigar,et al.  Emotional factors in attitudes and persuasion. , 2003 .

[53]  A. Kruglanski,et al.  The illusory second mode or, the cue is the message. , 1999 .

[54]  S. Chaiken The heuristic model of persuasion. , 1987 .

[55]  J. Braverman The Effect of Mood on Detection of Covariation , 2005, Personality & social psychology bulletin.

[56]  Jennifer Edson Escalas Self-Referencing and Persuasion: Narrative Transportation versus Analytical Elaboration , 2007 .

[57]  Michael D. Slater,et al.  Entertainment education and the persuasive impact of narratives. , 2002 .

[58]  J. M. Olson,et al.  Uncertainty orientation and persuasion: Individual differences in the effects of personal relevance on social judgments. , 1988 .

[59]  Marie Wilson,et al.  Information competition and vividness effects in on-line judgments , 1989 .

[60]  Stephen Worchel,et al.  Effects of Media, Communicator,and Message Position onAttitude Change , 1978 .

[61]  John T. Cacioppo,et al.  Effects of Forwarning of Persuasive Intent and Involvement on Cognitive Responses and Persuasion , 1979 .

[62]  H. Erb,et al.  Persuasion According to the Unimodel: Implications for Cancer Communication , 2006 .

[63]  K. Trzesniewski,et al.  Measuring Global Self-Esteem: Construct Validation of a Single-Item Measure and the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale , 2001 .

[64]  E. Vance Wilson,et al.  Persuasive Effects of System Features in Computer-Mediated Communication , 2005, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[65]  T. Brock,et al.  Journal of Personality and Social Psychology the Role of Transportation in the Persuasiveness of Public Narratives Text Quality Individual Differences and Situational Influences Transportation Scale Items Gender Differences Discriminant Validation: Need for Cognition Effect of Text Manipulation Beli , 2022 .

[66]  Geoff F. Kaufman,et al.  Understanding Media Enjoyment: The Role of Transportation Into Narrative Worlds , 2004 .

[67]  B. Rimer,et al.  Advancing Tailored Health Communication: A Persuasion and Message Effects Perspective , 2006 .

[68]  Melanie C. Green,et al.  Narratives and Cancer Communication , 2006 .

[69]  Marilyn J. Chambliss,et al.  Do Adults Change their Minds after Reading Persuasive Text? , 1996 .

[70]  Oscar M. Haugh The Relative Effectiveness of Reading and Listening to Radio Drama as Ways of Imparting Information and Shifting Attitudes , 1952 .

[71]  Steve Booth-Butterfield,et al.  Message modality and source credibility can interact to affect argument processing , 1993 .

[72]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  The Temporal Effects of Story and Statistical Evidence on Belief Change , 1994 .

[73]  Derek D. Rucker,et al.  The Role of Affect in Attitude Change , 2000 .

[74]  Wayne F. Velicer,et al.  Stages of change in psychotherapy: A follow-up report. , 1989 .