Accommodation response and visual discomfort

Although visual discomfort symptoms associated with near work have been correlated with clinical measures of accommodation, studies using objective recordings have not found corresponding deficits in accommodative function. One problem with previous studies is that accommodation measures have been too brief to assess accommodative fatigue. This study examined steady state accommodative responses among a college population with visual discomfort, over a 90‐s time period. Thirty‐one participants were grouped into high (n = 15) or low visual discomfort groups (n = 16) based on their scores on the Conlon Visual Discomfort Survey. Using the WAM‐5500 autorefractor, accommodation responses were recorded at 5 Hz for two consecutive minutes at five viewing distances. The results showed a significant interaction between the high and low discomfort groups over time in accommodation response. The high discomfort group showed an increase in accommodative lag, whereas the low discomfort group had a stable response. Our study suggests that the high visual discomfort group is characterized by accommodative fatigue, with a higher lag of accommodation developing at a near viewing distance over time.

[1]  M. Rouse,et al.  Prospective comparison of convergence insufficiency and normal binocular children on CIRS symptom surveys. Convergence Insufficiency and Reading Study (CIRS) group. , 1999, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[2]  Kristofer Kinsey,et al.  Can the magnocellular pathway read? Evidence from studies of color , 2003, Vision Research.

[3]  G. Törnqvist.  The relative importance of the parasympathetic and sympathetic nervous systems for accommodation in monkeys. , 1967, Investigative ophthalmology.

[4]  George K. Hung,et al.  Effect of cumulative nearwork on accommodative facility and asthenopia , 2004, International Ophthalmology.

[5]  Chris Chase,et al.  Visual Discomfort and Objective Measures of Static Accommodation , 2009, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[6]  J. Stein,et al.  L/M Speed-Matching Ratio Predicts Reading in Children , 2007, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[7]  A. Wilkins.  What is visual discomfort? , 1986, Trends in Neurosciences.

[8]  Philip B. Kruger,et al.  Small foveal targets for studies of accommodation and the Stiles–Crawford effect , 2004, Vision Research.

[9]  A J Wilkins,et al.  ON THE REDUCTION OF EYE‐STRAIN WHEN READING , 1984, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[10]  A. Wilkins,et al.  Increasing Reading Speed by Using Colours: Issues concerning Reliability and Specificity, and Their Theoretical and Practical Implications , 2005, Perception.

[11]  Rent M. Daum,et al.  CLINICAL MANAGEMENT OF BINOCULAR VISION: HETEROPHORIC, ACCOMMODATIVE AND EYE MOVEMENT DISORDERS , 1994 .

[12]  Jane Gwiazda,et al.  Comparison of Spherical Equivalent Refraction and Astigmatism Measured with Three Different Models of Autorefractors , 2002, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[13]  R Lunn,et al.  Visual Fatigue and Spatial Frequency Adaptation to Video Displays of Text , 1986, Human factors.

[14]  W. Ridder,et al.  Measuring Visual Discomfort in College Students , 2007, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[15]  Optometric correlates of Meares-Irlen syndrome: a matched group study. , 1995, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[16]  J. Wolffsohn,et al.  Clinical Evaluation of the Shin-Nippon NVision-K 5001/Grand Seiko WR-5100K Autorefractor , 2003, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[17]  A. Wilkins,et al.  A review of the management of 323 consecutive patients seen in a specific learning difficulties clinic , 1999, Ophthalmic & physiological optics.

[18]  Philip B. Kruger,et al.  Accommodation with and without short-wavelength-sensitive cones and chromatic aberration , 2005, Vision Research.

[19]  G K Hung,et al.  Proximal contribution to a linear static model of accommodation and vergence. , 1996, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[20]  Philippa Pattison,et al.  Measuring Visual Discomfort , 1999 .

[21]  Philip B. Kruger,et al.  Cone contributions to signals for accommodation and the relationship to refractive error , 2006, Vision Research.

[22]  M. Bullimore,et al.  Pharmacological effects on accommodative adaptation. , 1992, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[23]  J. Sheedy,et al.  Is all Asthenopia the Same? , 2003, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[24]  M. Rouse,et al.  Association of symptoms and convergence and accommodative insufficiency in school-age children. , 2003, Optometry.

[25]  I. Knez,et al.  Superior short‐wavelength contrast sensitivity in asthenopics during reflexive readjustments of ocular accommodation , 2007, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[26]  A. Wilkins,et al.  Coloured overlays in schools: orthoptic and optometric findings , 2002, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[27]  R. Suzuki,et al.  Neuronal influence on the mechanical activity of the ciliary muscle , 1983, British journal of pharmacology.

[28]  Arnold Wilkins,et al.  Coloured overlays and their effects on reading speed: a review , 2002, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[29]  A J Wilkins,et al.  Double‐masked placebo‐controlled trial of precision spectral filters in children who use coloured overlays , 1994, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[30]  K. Ciuffreda.  Chapter 4 – Accommodation, the Pupil, and Presbyopia , 2006 .

[31]  Loraine T Sinnott,et al.  Accommodative Fluctuations, Lens Tension, and Ciliary Body Thickness in Children , 2009, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[32]  Bin Wang,et al.  Depth-of-focus of the human eye in the near retinal periphery , 2003, Vision Research.

[33]  B. Gilmartin,et al.  Sympathetic inhibition of accommodation after sustained nearwork in subjects with myopia and emmetropia. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[34]  Adrian Glasser,et al.  Objective Accommodation Measurement with the Grand Seiko and Hartinger Coincidence Refractometer , 2007, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[35]  J S Wolffsohn,et al.  Simultaneous continuous recording of accommodation and pupil size using the modified Shin‐Nippon SRW‐5000 autorefractor , 2004, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[36]  Arnold J. Wilkins,et al.  The influence of tinted lenses upon ocular accommodation , 2001, Vision Research.