Evaluating nonpoint source critical source area contributions at the watershed scale.

Areas with disproportionately high pollutant losses (i.e., critical source areas [CSAs]) have been widely recognized as priority areas for the control of nonpoint-source pollution. The identification and evaluation of CSAs at the watershed scale allows state and federal programs to implement soil and water conservation measures where they are needed most. Despite many potential advantages, many state and federal conservation programs do not actively target CSAs. There is a lack of research identifying the total CSA pollutant contribution at the watershed scale, and there is no quantitative assessment of program effectiveness if CSAs are actively targeted. The purpose of this research was to identify and quantify sediment and total phosphorus loads originating from CSAs at the watershed scale using the Soil and Water Assessment Tool. This research is a synthesis of CSA targeting studies performed in six Oklahoma priority watersheds from 2001 to 2007 to aid the Oklahoma Conservation Commission in the prioritized placement of subsidized conservation measures. Within these six watersheds, 5% of the land area yielded 50% of sediment and 34% of the phosphorus load. In watersheds dominated by agriculture, the worst 5% of agricultural land contributed, on average, 22% of the total agricultural pollutant load. Pollutant loads from these agricultural CSAs were more than four times greater than the average load from agricultural areas within the watershed. Conservation practices implemented in these areas can be more effective because they have the opportunity to treat more pollutant. The evaluation of CSAs and prioritized implementation of conservation measures at the watershed scale has the potential to significantly improve the effectiveness of state and federally sponsored water quality programs.

[1]  A. Weersink,et al.  Cost-effective Targeting of Riparian Buffers , 2004 .

[2]  Kenneth H. Reckhow,et al.  COMPILATION OF MEASURED NUTRIENT LOAD DATA FOR AGRICULTURAL LAND USES IN THE UNITED STATES 1 , 2006 .

[3]  John R. Williams,et al.  LARGE AREA HYDROLOGIC MODELING AND ASSESSMENT PART I: MODEL DEVELOPMENT 1 , 1998 .

[4]  M. S. Srinivasan,et al.  Variable-source-area controls on phosphorus transport: Bridging the gap between research and design , 2002 .

[5]  Lars Prange,et al.  Non-point source critical area analysis in the Gisselö watershed using GIS , 2003, Environ. Model. Softw..

[6]  I. D. Moore,et al.  Modelling Erosion and Deposition: Topographic Effects , 1986 .

[7]  M. P. Tripathi,et al.  Identification and Prioritisation of Critical Sub-watersheds for Soil Conservation Management using the SWAT Model , 2003 .

[8]  F. Wilcoxon,et al.  Probability tables for individual comparisons by ranking methods. , 1947, Biometrics.

[9]  R. G. Gilbert,et al.  The Concept and Need for a Phosphorus Assessment Tool , 1993 .

[10]  W. J. Gburek,et al.  FARM-LEVEL OPTIMIZATION OF BMP PLACEMENT FOR COST-EFFECTIVE POLLUTION REDUCTION , 2004 .

[11]  Jennifer L. Weld,et al.  Development of phosphorus indices for nutrient management planning strategies in the United States , 2003 .

[12]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Directions , 2007 .

[13]  P. Nowak,et al.  Landscape Planning for Agricultural Nonpoint Source Pollution Reduction I: A Geographical Allocation Framework , 2008, Environmental management.

[14]  Andrew N. Sharpley,et al.  Critical source area controls on water quality in an agricultural watershed located in the Chesapeake basin. , 2000 .

[15]  H. B. Mann,et al.  On a Test of Whether one of Two Random Variables is Stochastically Larger than the Other , 1947 .

[16]  Åke Sivertun,et al.  A GIS method to aid in non-point source critical area analysis , 1988, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[17]  Tammo S. Steenhuis,et al.  SMoRMod – A GIS-integrated Rainfall-runoff Model , 1996 .

[18]  David C. Garen,et al.  CURVE NUMBER HYDROLOGY IN WATER QUALITY MODELING: USES, ABUSES, AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS 1 , 2005 .

[19]  Tammo S. Steenhuis,et al.  WATERSHED SCALE MODELING OF CRITICAL SOURCE AREAS OF RUNOFF GENERATION AND PHOSPHORUS TRANSPORT 1 , 2005 .

[20]  D. Helsel,et al.  Statistical methods in water resources , 2020, Techniques and Methods.

[21]  D. Mulla,et al.  Evaluation of the phosphorus index in watersheds at the regional scale. , 2001, Journal of environmental quality.

[22]  John R. Williams,et al.  The erosion-productivity impact calculator (EPIC) model: a case history , 1990 .

[23]  A. Sharpley Agricultural phosphorus, water quality, and poultry production: are they compatible? , 1999, Poultry science.

[24]  Raghavan Srinivasan,et al.  A GIS‐Coupled Hydrological Model System for the Watershed Assessment of Agricultural Nonpoint and Point Sources of Pollution , 2004, Trans. GIS.