Mapping suicide in London: a brief methodological case study on the application of the smoothing technique.

BACKGROUND When one intends to globally smooth unstable rates, e.g., suicide rates in a region, one needs to consider whether it is better to smooth the rates toward the global mean of the country or toward the global mean of the same region. AIMS The present study aims to provide a methodological framework to answer this question by smoothing suicide rates within London boroughs. METHODS Based on the results of the spatial autocorrelation statistics, the noniterative empirical Bayes method of moments was chosen to globally smooth the suicide rate of each borough, first toward the global mean of England and Wales, and second toward the mean of the London region. RESULTS The results revealed that smoothing the suicide rates of the boroughs toward the global mean of England and Wales had a stronger influence in reducing the variability of suicide rates than smoothing toward the global mean of the London region. CONCLUSIONS Smoothing the rates toward the mean of a region within a country acts somewhat between global and local smoothing.

[1]  G. Dunn,et al.  Do hot spots of deprivation predict the rates of suicide within London boroughs? , 2007, Health & place.

[2]  Graham Dunn,et al.  Geographical epidemiology, spatial analysis and geographical information systems: a multidisciplinary glossary , 2007, Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health.

[3]  Graham Dunn,et al.  The production and interpretation of disease maps , 2004, Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology.

[4]  P. Elliott,et al.  Spatial Epidemiology: Current Approaches and Future Challenges , 2004, Environmental health perspectives.

[5]  M. Rytkönen Not all maps are equal: GIS and spatial analysis in epidemiology , 2004, International journal of circumpolar health.

[6]  Gerard Rushton,et al.  Public health, GIS, and spatial analytic tools. , 2003, Annual review of public health.

[7]  R. Burnett,et al.  Spatial Analysis for Environmental Health Research: Concepts, Methods, and Examples , 2003, Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A.

[8]  Andrew B. Lawson,et al.  An Introductory Guide to Disease Mapping , 2001 .

[9]  J. Nicholl,et al.  Why do we continue to use standardized mortality ratios for small area comparisons? , 2001, Journal of public health medicine.

[10]  Andrew B. Lawson,et al.  An Introductory Guide to Disease Mapping: Lawson/Disease , 2001 .

[11]  Tx Station Stata Statistical Software: Release 7. , 2001 .

[12]  L D Broemeling,et al.  A bayesian analysis for spatial processes with application to disease mapping. , 2000, Statistics in medicine.

[13]  E. Lesaffre,et al.  Disease mapping and risk assessment for public health. , 1999 .

[14]  L. Appleby,et al.  National Confidential Inquiry into Suicide and Homicide by People with Mental Illness , 1997, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[15]  P. Elliott,et al.  Cluster analysis and disease mapping—why, when, and how? A step by step guide , 1996, BMJ.

[16]  Trevor C. Bailey,et al.  Interactive Spatial Data Analysis , 1995 .

[17]  L. Pickle,et al.  Effects of the choice of age-adjustment method on maps of death rates. , 1995, Statistics in medicine.

[18]  R. Marshall Mapping disease and mortality rates using empirical Bayes estimators. , 1991, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C, Applied statistics.

[19]  B. Efron,et al.  Stein's Paradox in Statistics , 1977 .

[20]  W. Tobler A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region , 1970 .

[21]  R. Geary,et al.  The Contiguity Ratio and Statistical Mapping , 1954 .

[22]  P. Moran The Interpretation of Statistical Maps , 1948 .