Synergistic dual positive feedback loops established by molecular sequestration generate robust bimodal response

Feedback loops are ubiquitous features of biological networks and can produce significant phenotypic heterogeneity, including a bimodal distribution of gene expression across an isogenic cell population. In this work, a combination of experiments and computational modeling was used to explore the roles of multiple feedback loops in the bimodal, switch-like response of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae galactose regulatory network. Here, we show that bistability underlies the observed bimodality, as opposed to stochastic effects, and that two unique positive feedback loops established by Gal1p and Gal3p, which both regulate network activity by molecular sequestration of Gal80p, induce this bimodality. Indeed, systematically scanning through different single and multiple feedback loop knockouts, we demonstrate that there is always a concentration regime that preserves the system’s bimodality, except for the double deletion of GAL1 and the GAL3 feedback loop, which exhibits a graded response for all conditions tested. The constitutive production rates of Gal1p and Gal3p operate as bifurcation parameters because variations in these rates can also abolish the system’s bimodal response. Our model indicates that this second loss of bistability ensues from the inactivation of the remaining feedback loop by the overexpressed regulatory component. More broadly, we show that the sequestration binding affinity is a critical parameter that can tune the range of conditions for bistability in a circuit with positive feedback established by molecular sequestration. In this system, two positive feedback loops can significantly enhance the region of bistability and the dynamic response time.

[1]  Nicolas E. Buchler,et al.  Molecular titration and ultrasensitivity in regulatory networks. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[2]  D. Tzamarias,et al.  A Yeast Catabolic Enzyme Controls Transcriptional Memory , 2007, Current Biology.

[3]  James E. Ferrell,et al.  Substrate Competition as a Source of Ultrasensitivity in the Inactivation of Wee1 , 2007, Cell.

[4]  J. Posakony,et al.  The Drosophila extramacrochaetae protein antagonizes sequence-specific DNA binding by daughterless/achaete-scute protein complexes. , 1991, Development.

[5]  P. J. Bhat,et al.  Overproduction of the GAL1 or GAL3 protein causes galactose-independent activation of the GAL4 protein: evidence for a new model of induction for the yeast GAL/MEL regulon , 1992, Molecular and cellular biology.

[6]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Feedback Systems An Introduction for Scientists and Engineers , 2007 .

[7]  Sean B. Carroll,et al.  Gene duplication and the adaptive evolution of a classic genetic switch , 2007, Nature.

[8]  U. Alon,et al.  Negative autoregulation speeds the response times of transcription networks. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[9]  Kristy M. Hawkins,et al.  The Regulatory Roles of the Galactose Permease and Kinase in the Induction Response of the GAL Network in Saccharomyces cerevisiae* , 2006, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  Jayajit Das,et al.  Purely stochastic binary decisions in cell signaling models without underlying deterministic bistabilities , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[11]  R. Schekman,et al.  GAL2 codes for a membrane-bound subunit of the galactose permease in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1986, Journal of bacteriology.

[12]  D. Timson,et al.  Gal3p and Gal1p interact with the transcriptional repressor Gal80p to form a complex of 1:1 stoichiometry. , 2002, The Biochemical journal.

[13]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  Untangling the wires: A strategy to trace functional interactions in signaling and gene networks , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  G. Crabtree,et al.  Cell signaling can direct either binary or graded transcriptional responses , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[15]  Farren J. Isaacs,et al.  Prediction and measurement of an autoregulatory genetic module , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  J. Hopper,et al.  Disruption of regulatory gene GAL80 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: effects on carbon-controlled regulation of the galactose/melibiose pathway genes , 1984, Molecular and cellular biology.

[17]  J. Ferrell Self-perpetuating states in signal transduction: positive feedback, double-negative feedback and bistability. , 2002, Current opinion in cell biology.

[18]  A. Arkin,et al.  Stochastic amplification and signaling in enzymatic futile cycles through noise-induced bistability with oscillations. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  R. C. Dickson,et al.  Genetic and biochemical characterization of the galactose gene cluster in Kluyveromyces lactis , 1984, Journal of bacteriology.

[20]  F. Taddei,et al.  Bet-hedging and epigenetic inheritance in bacterial cell development , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Nicolas E. Buchler,et al.  Protein sequestration generates a flexible ultrasensitive response in a genetic network , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[22]  J. Hopper,et al.  Yeast regulatory gene GAL3: carbon regulation; UASGal elements in common with GAL1, GAL2, GAL7, GAL10, GAL80, and MEL1; encoded protein strikingly similar to yeast and Escherichia coli galactokinases , 1988, Molecular and cellular biology.

[23]  M. Johnston A model fungal gene regulatory mechanism: the GAL genes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1987, Microbiological reviews.

[24]  Takeharu Nagai,et al.  Shift anticipated in DNA microarray market , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[25]  A. Goldbeter,et al.  Bistability without Hysteresis in Chemical Reaction Systems: A Theoretical Analysis of Irreversible Transitions between Multiple Steady States , 1997 .

[26]  H. Bujard,et al.  Independent and tight regulation of transcriptional units in Escherichia coli via the LacR/O, the TetR/O and AraC/I1-I2 regulatory elements. , 1997, Nucleic acids research.

[27]  D. Hawthorne,et al.  ENZYMATIC EXPRESSION AND GENETIC LINKAGE OF GENES CONTROLLING GALACTOSE UTILIZATION IN SACCHAROMYCES. , 1964, Genetics.

[28]  David A. Cox,et al.  Solving Polynomial Equations: Foundations, Algorithms, and Applications (Algorithms and Computation in Mathematics) , 2005 .

[29]  James E. Ferrell,et al.  Feedback regulation of opposing enzymes generates robust, all-or-none bistable responses , 2008, Current Biology.

[30]  A. Bhattacharya,et al.  A Network of Broadly Expressed HLH Genes Regulates Tissue-Specific Cell Fates , 2011, Cell.

[31]  M. Elowitz,et al.  Regulatory activity revealed by dynamic correlations in gene expression noise , 2008, Nature Genetics.

[32]  S. Bonhoeffer,et al.  Evolution of Cross‐Feeding in Microbial Populations , 2004, The American Naturalist.

[33]  Gregory Stephanopoulos,et al.  Engineering of Promoter Replacement Cassettes for Fine-Tuning of Gene Expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2006, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[34]  A. Oudenaarden,et al.  Enhancement of cellular memory by reducing stochastic transitions , 2005, Nature.

[35]  T. Jowitt,et al.  The Effect of Ligand Binding on the Galactokinase Activity of Yeast Gal1p and Its Ability to Activate Transcription* , 2009, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[36]  D. Timson,et al.  Molecular Structure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Gal1p, a Bifunctional Galactokinase and Transcriptional Inducer* , 2005, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[37]  L. Serrano,et al.  Engineering stability in gene networks by autoregulation , 2000, Nature.

[38]  J. Ferrell Tripping the switch fantastic: how a protein kinase cascade can convert graded inputs into switch-like outputs. , 1996, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[39]  M. T. Hasan,et al.  Exploring the sequence space for tetracycline-dependent transcriptional activators: novel mutations yield expanded range and sensitivity. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  Onn Brandman,et al.  Feedback Loops Shape Cellular Signals in Space and Time , 2008, Science.

[41]  Glenn Vinnicombe,et al.  Noise in Gene Regulatory Networks , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[42]  R. J. Reece,et al.  Interplay of a Ligand Sensor and an Enzyme in Controlling Expression of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae GAL Genes , 2011, Eukaryotic Cell.

[43]  J. François,et al.  Validation of reference genes for quantitative expression analysis by real-time RT-PCR in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2009, BMC Molecular Biology.

[44]  J. Hopper,et al.  Genetic and molecular analysis of the GAL3 gene in the expression of the galactose/melibiose regulon of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1986, Genetics.

[45]  Thomas D. Schmittgen,et al.  Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. , 2001, Methods.

[46]  T. Kepler,et al.  Stochasticity in transcriptional regulation: origins, consequences, and mathematical representations. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[47]  M. Alonso,et al.  Regulation of scute function by extramacrochaete in vitro and in vivo. , 1994, Development.

[48]  O. Kuipers,et al.  Bistability, epigenetics, and bet-hedging in bacteria. , 2008, Annual review of microbiology.

[49]  C. Thron,et al.  A model for a bistable biochemical trigger of mitosis. , 1996, Biophysical chemistry.