Automated carotid IMT measurement and its validation in low contrast ultrasound database of 885 patient Indian population epidemiological study: results of AtheroEdge™ Software.

AIM The aim of this paper was to demonstrate the usage of an automated computer-based IMT measurement system called - CALEX 3.0 (a class of patented AtheroEdge™ software) on a low contrast and low resolution image database acquired during an epidemiological study from India. The image contrast was very low with pixel density of 12.7 pixels/mm. Further, to demonstrate the accuracy and reproducibility of the AtheroEdge™ software system we compared it with the manual tracings of a vascular surgeon--considered as a gold standard. METHODS We automatically measured the IMT value of 885 common carotid arteries in longitudinal B-Mode images. CALEX 3.0 consisted of a stage for the automatic recognition of the carotid artery and an IMT measurement modulus made of a fuzzy K-means classifier. Performance was assessed by measuring the system accuracy and reproducibility against manual tracings by experts. RESULTS CALEX 3.0 processed all the 885 images of the dataset (100% success). The average automated obtained IMT measurement by CALEX 3.0 was 0.407±0.083 mm compared with 0.429 ± 0.052 mm for the manual tracings, which led to an IMT bias of 0.022±0.081mm. The IMT measurement accuracy (0.022 mm) was comparable to that obtained on high-resolution images and the reproducibility (0.081 mm) was very low and suitable to clinical application. The Figure-of-Merit defined as the percent agreement between the computer-estimated IMT and manually measured IMT for CALEX 3.0 was 94.7%. CONCLUSION CALEX 3.0 had a 100% success in processing low contrast/low-resolution images. CALEX 3.0 is the first technique, which has led to high accuracy and reproducibility on low-resolution images acquired during an epidemiological study. We propose CALEX 3.0 as a generalized framework for IMT measurement on large datasets.

[1]  Seymour Glagov,et al.  B-mode ultrasonographic characterization of carotid atherosclerotic plaques in symptomatic and asymptomatic patients. , 2005, Journal of vascular surgery.

[2]  J. Badimón,et al.  Genesis and Dynamics of Atherosclerotic Lesions: Implications for Early Detection , 2009, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[3]  F. Faita,et al.  Real‐time Measurement System for Evaluation of the Carotid Intima‐Media Thickness With a Robust Edge Operator , 2008, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[4]  Wei Chen,et al.  Correlates of vascular structure and function measures in asymptomatic young adults: the Bogalusa Heart Study. , 2006, Atherosclerosis.

[5]  J. Kastelein,et al.  Surrogate markers of atherosclerosis: impact of statins. , 2003, Atherosclerosis. Supplements.

[6]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  AUTOMATIC COMPUTER-BASED TRACINGS (ACT) IN LONGITUDINAL 2-D ULTRASOUND IMAGES USING DIFFERENT SCANNERS , 2009 .

[7]  Michael J Pencina,et al.  Associations of Carotid Artery Intima‐Media Thickness (IMT) With Risk Factors and Prevalent Cardiovascular Disease , 2010, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[8]  V. Hachinski,et al.  The North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial : surgical results in 1415 patients. , 1999, Stroke.

[9]  Jonathan H Gillard,et al.  Carotid-artery imaging in the diagnosis and management of patients at risk of stroke , 2009, The Lancet Neurology.

[10]  A. DeMaria,et al.  Editorials: why, when, and how. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  Michael Walter,et al.  Interrelationships among HDL metabolism, aging, and atherosclerosis. , 2009, Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology.

[12]  M. Bots,et al.  Targeting the vessel wall in cardiovascular prevention , 2008 .

[13]  Christos P. Loizou,et al.  Quality evaluation of ultrasound imaging in the carotid artery based on normalization and speckle reduction filtering , 2006, Proceedings of the 12th IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (IEEE Cat. No.04CH37521).

[14]  J. Slattery,et al.  Prognostic Value and Reproducibility of Measurements of Carotid Stenosis: A Comparison of Three Methods on 1001 Angiograms , 1994, Stroke.

[15]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  A state of the art review on intima-media thickness (IMT) measurement and wall segmentation techniques for carotid ultrasound , 2010, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[16]  E. Vicaut,et al.  Mannheim Carotid Intima-Media Thickness Consensus (2004–2006) , 2006, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[17]  Alejandro Macchia,et al.  CARMELA: assessment of cardiovascular risk in seven Latin American cities. , 2008, The American journal of medicine.

[18]  Stein Harald Johnsen,et al.  Carotid plaque compared with intima-media thickness as a predictor of coronary and cerebrovascular disease , 2009, Current cardiology reports.

[19]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  Inter-Greedy Technique for Fusion of Different Segmentation Strategies Leading to High-Performance Carotid IMT Measurement in Ultrasound Images , 2011, Journal of Medical Systems.

[20]  John W. Norris,et al.  The NASCET-ACAS plaque project , 1993 .

[21]  J. Suri,et al.  An Integrated Approach to Computer‐Based Automated Tracing and Its Validation for 200 Common Carotid Arterial Wall Ultrasound Images , 2010, Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine.

[22]  T. Kilpeläinen,et al.  Reproducibility of phantom-based quality assurance parameters in real-time ultrasound imaging , 2011, Acta radiologica.

[23]  Filippo Molinari,et al.  Comparison between manual and automated analysis for the quantification of carotid wall by using sonography. A validation study with CT. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[24]  Filippo Molinari,et al.  Intima-media thickness: setting a standard for a completely automated method of ultrasound measurement , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[25]  David Lieu,et al.  Ultrasound physics and instrumentation for pathologists. , 2010, Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine.

[26]  T. Naqvi Ultrasound vascular screening for cardiovascular risk assessment. Why, when and how? , 2006, Minerva cardioangiologica.

[27]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  Evaluation of Carotid Wall Thickness by using Computed Tomography and Semiautomated Ultrasonographic Software , 2011 .

[28]  Jasjit S. Suri,et al.  Greedy Technique and Its Validation for Fusion of Two Segmentation Paradigms Leads to an Accurate Intima–Media Thickness Measure in Plaque Carotid Arterial Ultrasound , 2010 .

[29]  A. Hofman,et al.  Predictive Value of Noninvasive Measures of Atherosclerosis for Incident Myocardial Infarction: The Rotterdam Study , 2004, Circulation.

[30]  D. Sackett,et al.  Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[31]  Robert M. Haralick,et al.  Greedy Algorithm for Error Correction in Automatically Produced Boundaries from Low Contrast Ventriculograms , 2000, Pattern Analysis & Applications.

[32]  C. Stefanadis,et al.  Biomarkers of premature atherosclerosis. , 2009, Trends in molecular medicine.

[33]  Liexiang Fan,et al.  A semiautomated ultrasound border detection program that facilitates clinical measurement of ultrasound carotid intima-media thickness. , 2005, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[34]  N. Kohno,et al.  Influence of westernization of lifestyle on the progression of IMT in Japanese. , 2004, Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis.

[35]  M Cosgrove,et al.  The NASCET-ACAS plaque project. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. , 1993, Stroke.

[36]  S. Y. Wang,et al.  The clinical significance of carotid intima-media thickness in cardiovascular diseases: a survey in Beijing , 2008, Journal of Human Hypertension.

[37]  E. Vicaut,et al.  Mannheim Intima-Media Thickness Consensus , 2004, Cerebrovascular Diseases.