Resource Discovery and Universal Access: Understanding Enablers and Barriers from the User Perspective.

Resource discovery tools are the keys to explore, find, and retrieve resources from multitudes of collections hosted by library and information systems. Modern resource discovery tools provide facet-rich interfaces that provide multiple alternatives to expose resources for their potential users and help them navigate to the resources they need. This paper examines one of those tools from the perspective of universal access, utilizing the experience of users with print disability. It aimed at exploring the way print disabled users use library search tools, the barriers they might face in the process, and what needs to be considered in order to implement discovery tools that incorporate the needs of users with print disability. Interviews that involved user testing were made with selected group of users. The data obtained in the process was analyzed and compared against the existing body of knowledge to forward design recommendations for future endeavors.

[1]  David J. Comeaux.  Usability Testing of a Web-Scale Discovery System at an Academic Library , 2012 .

[2]  Frode Eika Sandnes,et al.  Searching databases without query-building aids: implications for dyslexic users , 2015, Inf. Res..

[3]  Simon Wakeling.  The user-centered design of a recommender system for a universal library catalogue , 2012, RecSys '12.

[4]  Ann Chapman.  Resource Discovery: Catalogs, Cataloging, and the User , 2007, Libr. Trends.

[5]  Michael Mönnich,et al.  Adding Value to the Library Catalog by Implementing a Recommendation System , 2008, D Lib Mag..

[6]  Shigeo Sugimoto,et al.  Enabling Resource Selection Based on Written English and Intellectual Competencies , 2007, ICADL.

[7]  Norda Majekodunmi,et al.  Online databases and the research experience for university students with print disabilities , 2011, Libr. Hi Tech.

[8]  Jan Gulliksen,et al.  Universal design, inclusive design, accessible design, design for all: different concepts—one goal? On the concept of accessibility—historical, methodological and philosophical aspects , 2014, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[9]  Graeme Douglas,et al.  Evaluating the use of the ICF as a framework for interviewing people with a visual impairment about their mobility and travel , 2012 .

[10]  Rice Majors,et al.  Comparative User Experiences of Next-Generation Catalogue Interfaces , 2012, Libr. Trends.

[11]  Erin Dorris Cassidy,et al.  Student Searching with EBSCO Discovery: A Usability Study , 2014 .

[12]  Micheline Hancock-Beaulieu,et al.  Evaluating the Impact of an Online Library Catalogue on subject Searching behaviour at the Catalogue and T the shelves , 1991, J. Documentation.

[13]  Tao Zhang,et al.  Study of User Search Activities With Two Discovery Tools at an Academic Library , 2014, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[14]  William H. Walters,et al.  E-books in Academic Libraries: Challenges for Discovery and Access , 2013 .

[15]  Jody Condit Fagan.  Usability studies of faceted browsing: A literature review , 2010 .

[16]  Sofia Stamou,et al.  Interpreting User Inactivity on Search Results , 2010, ECIR.

[17]  Peter Gregor,et al.  User-Sensitive Inclusive Design , 2011, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[18]  Xi Niu,et al.  Faceted Search in Library Catalogs , 2014 .

[19]  Graeme Douglas,et al.  The role of the WHO ICF as a framework to interpret barriers and to inclusion: visually impaired people’s views and experiences of personal computers , 2007 .