Selection and stopping in voluntary action: A meta-analysis and combined fMRI study

Voluntary action control requires selection of appropriate responses and stopping of inappropriate responses. Selection and stopping are often investigated separately, but they appear to recruit similar brain regions, including the pre-supplementary motor area (preSMA) and inferior frontal gyrus. We therefore examined the evidence for overlap of selection and stopping using two approaches: a meta-analysis of existing studies of selection and stopping, and a novel within-subject fMRI study in which action selection and a stop signal task were combined factorially. The novel fMRI study also permitted us to investigate hypotheses regarding a common mechanism for selection and stopping. The preSMA was identified by both methods as common to selection and stopping. However, stopping a selected action did not recruit preSMA more than stopping a specified action, nor did stop signal reaction times differ significantly across the two conditions. These findings suggest that the preSMA supports both action selection and stopping, but the two processes may not require access to a common inhibition mechanism. Instead, the preSMA might represent information about potential actions that is used in both action selection and stopping in order to resolve conflict between competing available responses.

[1]  M. Hallett,et al.  Cerebral structures participating in motor preparation in humans: a positron emission tomography study. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[2]  Michael J. Frank,et al.  Hold Your Horses: Impulsivity, Deep Brain Stimulation, and Medication in Parkinsonism , 2007, Science.

[3]  C. Li,et al.  Behavioral/systems/cognitive Functional Connectivity Delineates Distinct Roles of the Inferior Frontal Cortex and Presupplementary Motor Area in Stop Signal Inhibition , 2022 .

[4]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  The Role of the Medial Frontal Cortex in Cognitive Control , 2004, Science.

[5]  G. Logan,et al.  On the ability to inhibit simple and choice reaction time responses: a model and a method. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[6]  T. Goschke,et al.  The dynamics of cognitive control: evidence for within-trial conflict adaptation from frequency-tagged EEG. , 2011, Psychophysiology.

[7]  John Duncan,et al.  The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus: inhibition and attentional control , 2010, NeuroImage.

[8]  Stewart H. Mostofsky,et al.  Response Inhibition and Response Selection: Two Sides of the Same Coin , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[9]  Agnes J. Jasinska,et al.  Automatic inhibition and habitual control: alternative views in neuroscience research on response inhibition and inhibitory control , 2013, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[10]  G. Logan,et al.  Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  R. Elliott,et al.  Serotonin 2A Receptors, Citalopram and Tryptophan-Depletion: a Multimodal Imaging Study of their Interactions During Response Inhibition , 2012, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[12]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Systems Neuroscience , 2022 .

[13]  Timothy Edward John Behrens,et al.  Triangulating a Cognitive Control Network Using Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Functional MRI , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  Maneesh C. Patel,et al.  Distinct frontal systems for response inhibition, attentional capture, and error processing , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  M. Coles,et al.  On the programming and reprogramming of actions. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Willed action and the prefrontal cortex in man: a study with PET , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[17]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Cortical and subcortical interactions during action reprogramming and their related white matter pathways , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  J. Duncan The multiple-demand (MD) system of the primate brain: mental programs for intelligent behaviour , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  H. Pashler Dual-task interference in simple tasks: data and theory. , 1994, Psychological bulletin.

[20]  H. C Lau,et al.  Willed action and attention to the selection of action , 2004, NeuroImage.

[21]  Katrin Amunts,et al.  Architecture and organizational principles of Broca's region , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  J. Kalaska,et al.  Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices. , 2010, Annual review of neuroscience.

[23]  Russell A. Poldrack,et al.  Inhibition-related Activation in the Right Inferior Frontal Gyrus in the Absence of Inhibitory Cues , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[24]  Diane Swick,et al.  Are the neural correlates of stopping and not going identical? Quantitative meta-analysis of two response inhibition tasks , 2011, NeuroImage.

[25]  T. Robbins,et al.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[26]  Roger A. Barker,et al.  Perseveration and Choice in Parkinson's Disease: The Impact of Progressive Frontostriatal Dysfunction on Action Decisions , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  James B. Rowe,et al.  Action selection: A race model for selected and non-selected actions distinguishes the contribution of premotor and prefrontal areas , 2010, NeuroImage.

[28]  Simon B Eickhoff,et al.  Minimizing within‐experiment and within‐group effects in activation likelihood estimation meta‐analyses , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[29]  C. N. Boehler,et al.  The influence of different Stop-signal response time estimation procedures on behavior–behavior and brain–behavior correlations , 2012, Behavioural Brain Research.

[30]  Ewald Moser,et al.  Premovement activity of the pre-supplementary motor area and the readiness for action: studies of time-resolved event-related functional MRI. , 2005, Human movement science.

[31]  K. Zilles,et al.  The "what" and "when" of self-initiated movements. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  James B. Rowe,et al.  Selection and inhibition mechanisms for human voluntary action decisions , 2012, NeuroImage.

[33]  Parashkev Nachev,et al.  Volition and Conflict in Human Medial Frontal Cortex , 2005, Current Biology.

[34]  M. Brass,et al.  The What, When, Whether Model of Intentional Action , 2008, The Neuroscientist : a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry.

[35]  R. Passingham,et al.  The prefrontal cortex: response selection or maintenance within working memory? , 2000, 5th IEEE EMBS International Summer School on Biomedical Imaging, 2002..

[36]  M. Rushworth Intention, Choice, and the Medial Frontal Cortex , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Conflict monitoring and anterior cingulate cortex: an update , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[38]  Hakwan C. Lau,et al.  Dissociating response selection and conflict in the medial frontal surface , 2006, NeuroImage.

[39]  R. Passingham,et al.  Medial frontal cortex: from self-generated action to reflection on one's own performance , 2010, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[40]  P. Haggard,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Intentional Inhibition in Human Action: the Power of 'no' , 2022 .

[41]  Pierre-Louis Bazin,et al.  Cortico-subthalamic white matter tract strength predicts interindividual efficacy in stopping a motor response , 2012, NeuroImage.

[42]  R. Barker,et al.  Parkinson's disease and healthy aging: Independent and interacting effects on action selection , 2010, Human brain mapping.

[43]  Hoi-Chung Leung,et al.  Rule-Guided Executive Control of Response Inhibition: Functional Topography of the Inferior Frontal Cortex , 2011, PloS one.

[44]  Eliza Congdon,et al.  Measurement and Reliability of Response Inhibition , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[45]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  False discovery rate revisited: FDR and topological inference using Gaussian random fields , 2009, NeuroImage.

[46]  A. Schleicher,et al.  Broca's region revisited: Cytoarchitecture and intersubject variability , 1999, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[47]  A. Wagner,et al.  Cognitive control and right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex: reflexive reorienting, motor inhibition, and action updating , 2011, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Julie Duque,et al.  Top–Down Inhibitory Control Exerted by the Medial Frontal Cortex during Action Selection under Conflict , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[49]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Behavioral/systems/cognitive Effective Connectivity Reveals Important Roles for Both the Hyperdirect (fronto-subthalamic) and the Indirect (fronto-striatal-pallidal) Fronto-basal Ganglia Pathways during Response Inhibition , 2022 .

[50]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  Activation likelihood estimation meta-analysis revisited , 2012, NeuroImage.

[51]  M. Jahanshahi,et al.  Willed action and its impairments. , 1998, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[52]  S. Bestmann,et al.  Time-Dependent Changes in Human Corticospinal Excitability Reveal Value-Based Competition for Action during Decision Processing , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[53]  Martina Rieger,et al.  Inhibitory after‐effects in the stop signal paradigm , 1999 .

[54]  H. Leung,et al.  Cortical activity during manual response inhibition guided by color and orientation cues , 2009, Brain Research.

[55]  A. Anwander,et al.  Connectivity-Based Parcellation of Broca's Area. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[56]  M. Walton,et al.  Action sets and decisions in the medial frontal cortex , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[57]  C. Kennard,et al.  The role of the pre-supplementary motor area in the control of action , 2007, NeuroImage.

[58]  Willem A. Nolen,et al.  Inhibit yourself and understand the other: Neural basis of distinct processes underlying Theory of Mind , 2011, NeuroImage.

[59]  A. Aron,et al.  Theta burst stimulation dissociates attention and action updating in human inferior frontal cortex , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[60]  S. Swinnen,et al.  Aging and Inhibitory Control of Action: Cortico-Subthalamic Connection Strength Predicts Stopping Performance , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[61]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Preparation to Inhibit a Response Complements Response Inhibition during Performance of a Stop-Signal Task , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[62]  Shaun R. Patel,et al.  Human Dorsal Anterior Cingulate Cortex Neurons Mediate Ongoing Behavioral Adaptation , 2012, Nature.

[63]  Simon B. Eickhoff,et al.  A new SPM toolbox for combining probabilistic cytoarchitectonic maps and functional imaging data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[64]  P. Morosan,et al.  Broca's Region: Novel Organizational Principles and Multiple Receptor Mapping , 2010, PLoS biology.

[65]  Patrick G. Bissett,et al.  Stopping while going! Response inhibition does not suffer dual-task interference. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[66]  R. Poldrack,et al.  Cortical and Subcortical Contributions to Stop Signal Response Inhibition: Role of the Subthalamic Nucleus , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[67]  René S. Kahn,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Functional MRI Reveal Cortical and Subcortical Interactions during Stop-signal Response Inhibition , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[68]  Frederick Verbruggen,et al.  Short-term aftereffects of response inhibition: repetition priming or between-trial control adjustments? , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.