Continuous spatial modelling to analyse planning and economic consequences of offshore wind energy

Offshore wind resources appear abundant, but technological, economic and planning issues significantly reduce the theoretical potential. While massive investments are anticipated and planners and developers are scouting for viable locations and consider risk and impact, few studies simultaneously address potentials and costs together with the consequences of proposed planning in an analytical and continuous manner and for larger areas at once. Consequences may be investments short of efficiency and equity, and failed planning routines. A spatial resource economic model for the Danish offshore waters is presented, used to analyse area constraints, technological risks, priorities for development and opportunity costs of maintaining competing area uses. The SCREAM-offshore wind model (Spatially Continuous Resource Economic Analysis Model) uses raster-based geographical information systems (GIS) and considers numerous geographical factors, technology and cost data as well as planning information. Novel elements are weighted visibility analysis and geographically recorded shipping movements as variable constraints. A number of scenarios have been described, which include restrictions of using offshore areas, as well as alternative uses such as conservation and tourism. The results comprise maps, tables and cost-supply curves for further resource economic assessment and policy analysis. A discussion of parameter variations exposes uncertainties of technology development, environmental protection as well as competing area uses and illustrates how such models might assist in ameliorating public planning, while procuring decision bases for the political process. The method can be adapted to different research questions, and is largely applicable in other parts of the world.

[1]  N. Mortensen,et al.  The numerical wind atlas - the KAMM/WAsP method , 2001 .

[2]  Martin Junginger,et al.  Technological learning in offshore wind energy: Different roles of the government , 2007 .

[3]  Tim Cockerill,et al.  Combined technical and economic evaluation of the Northern European offshore wind resource , 2001 .

[4]  P. Morthorst Capacity development and profitability of wind turbines , 1999 .

[5]  Jon Andreu,et al.  Transmission alternatives for offshore electrical power , 2009 .

[6]  Brian Vad Mathiesen,et al.  Energy system analysis of 100% renewable energy systems-The case of Denmark in years 2030 and 2050 , 2009 .

[7]  Frede Hvelplund Renewable energy and the need for local energy markets , 2006 .

[8]  Maarten Wolsink,et al.  Near-shore Wind Power - Protected Seascapes, Environmentalists' Attitudes, and the Technocratic Planning Perspective , 2010 .

[9]  Bernd Möller,et al.  Analysing transport costs of Danish forest wood chip resources by means of continuous cost surfaces , 2007 .

[10]  Wilhelm Windhorst,et al.  Ecosystem based modeling and indication of ecological integrity in the German North Sea—Case study offshore wind parks , 2011 .

[11]  Jørgen Højstrup,et al.  Evaluation of the wind-resource estimation program WAsP for offshore applications , 2001 .

[12]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  Global experience curves for wind farms , 2005 .

[13]  Stan Openshaw,et al.  Modifiable Areal Unit Problem , 2008, Encyclopedia of GIS.

[14]  Kira Gee,et al.  Offshore wind power development as affected by seascape values on the German North Sea coast , 2010 .

[15]  S. Jay Planners to the rescue: spatial planning facilitating the development of offshore wind energy. , 2010, Marine pollution bulletin.

[16]  Geir Moe,et al.  Status, plans and technologies for offshore wind turbines in Europe and North America , 2009 .